How Lebanon dodged the Arab Spring

The Middle East, you may have noticed, has been an inhospitable place over the past several years for family dynasties. Egyptians revolted when it became increasingly obvious that Hosni Mubarak would attempt to pass the presidency off to his son, Gamal. Syrians are fighting a bloody war to rid themselves of Bashar al-Assad, another second-generation ruler. The wealth and power of Zine el-Abidine Ben Ali's family was a rallying cry for the revolution in Tunisia, and Yemenis are still focused on wresting away important military positions from the sons of deposed President Ali Abdullah Saleh.

But there is one nominally democratic Arab country where the tradition of politics as a family business is alive and well: Lebanon. And with Tammam Salam, the son of former Prime Minister Saeb Salam, expected to be nominated for the premiership as a consensus candidate, Beirut will welcome another dynasty into the fold.

Lebanon's powerful families have somehow survived a civil war, foreign interventions, and the ballot box: There's former Prime Minister Saad Hariri, son of billionaire premier Rafiq Hariri; Druze leader Walid Jumblatt, son of Kamal Jumblatt; MP Sami Gemayel, son of former President Amin Gemayel and grandson of MP Pierre Gemayel; MP Nayla Tueini, daughter of journalist and MP Gebran Tueini and granddaughter of journalist and MP Ghassan Tueini; MP Suleiman Franjieh, son of assassinated civil war-era leader Antoine Franjieh and grandson of former President Suleiman Franjieh; and Youth Minister Faisal Karame, son of former Prime Minister Omar Karame. The list goes on, but you get the idea.

It's a great irony: In the one Arab country where citizens could legally and peacefully rid themselves of second- and third-generation leaders who rose on little but their last name, they choose not to do so. There are a lot of reasons for that, related to Lebanon's peculiar political system and its precarious domestic peace -- but one key reason is the families themselves have proven incredibly politically flexible.

Take Lebanon's newest scion, Tammam Salam. His father Saeb was a Sunni leader in Beirut during the 1950s, and something of a radical -- he was enamored of Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser's vision of pan-Arab unity, a staunch opponent of U.S. and British influence in the Middle East, and a critic of the Christian community's domination of Lebanese politics. He joined an armed rebellion against the government in 1958, and established control over the Beirut neighborhood of Basta. He was "smooth as oiled silk," according to a U.S. State Department cable from the time, and showed off his arsenal of machine guns to the U.S ambassador when he came visiting, boasting "the Basta has the best."

The United States, it goes without saying, hated Saeb Salam. The U.S. embassy in Beirut was quick to squash a suggestion that a covert deal could be reached with him. "No touch with that morally slimy rug merchant could ever be discreet enough," reads a cable from May 1958.

Today, the Salam political dynasty lives -- even as the political beliefs it upholds bear no resemblance to those it held in the previous era. Tammam Salam is the very image of moderation, winning the support of anti-Assad and pro-Assad Lebanese parties alike. It's a neat trick: The times may change in Lebanon, but the faces remain the same. 




Obama may be taking a pay cut, but he's no president of Uruguay

A day after President Obama announced that he will give back five percent of his salary this year in solidarity with federal workers facing furloughs, skimming $20,000 from his $400,000 annual wage, other U.S. political figures are following suit. On Thursday, Secretary of State John Kerry pledged to donate five percent of his salary to charity. Attorney General Eric Holder, meanwhile, was a bit more tepid, offering to give back a portion of his salary if the Department of Justice faces furloughs.

While Obama -- who himself was following in the footsteps of Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel -- may be at the forefront of the current trend in the United States, he's hardly the first world leader to stomach a self-imposed pay reduction during tough economic times, and his voluntary cutback is certainly not the most dramatic.

In 2010, for instance, British Prime Minister David Cameron agreed to trim his earnings by £7,500 (roughly $11,400) when his coalition took over. While this also amounted to about five percent of his salary -- that salary was significantly lower than Obama's at £150,000 (around $230,000). And rather than a one-off pay cut, Cameron's belt-tightening was part of a long-term, government-wide move toward austerity.

Two years later, Lee Hsien Loong, the prime minister of Singapore, accepted a 36-percent cut in annual income, which seems pretty drastic until you consider that the reduction still left him earning a comfortable $1.7 million a year. While the Singaporean government has long held the belief that inflated salaries curb corruption and draw talented people to public service, they ultimately caved to pressure from voters and adjusted wages for all of the country's top leaders. Even with the pay cut, however, the prime minister remains the highest-paid elected head of state.

Still, there's no more radical example of personal sacrifice among world leaders than José Mujica, the notoriously low-maintenance president of Uruguay, who donates 90 percent of the roughly $144,000 he earns a year to charity. Mujica shuns the typical presidential perks, living on a farm with his wife and tending the land themselves. Barack and Michelle might not be up for that lifestyle. But as far as symbolic gestures go, it definitely makes the president's five-percent cut look a bit paltry.

Alex Wong/Getty Images