Esquire stands by its Osama bin Laden story amid storm of criticism

Esquire's bombshell cover story about the "the man who killed Osama bin Laden" is being pulled apart at the seams, but in a statement to Foreign Policy, the magazine says "We stand by our story."

On Tuesday, CNN's national security analyst Peter Bergen reported an account from a SEAL Team 6 member who said the Esquire story is "complete B-S." The dispute centers on allegations that the Esquire subject exaggerated his role in the raid and fabricated key elements of the story.

In the magazine's account, the anonymous SEAL, identified only as "The Shooter," says he took the critical shot that fell bin Laden after a direct confrontation with the al Qaeda leader. But the CNN account says another SEAL had already "gravely" wounded bin Laden with a shot in the head: By the time "the Shooter" found bin Laden, the terrorist leader was already on the ground (practically dead).

This may sound like a lot of he-said, she-said, but it's a huge deal in the Special Forces community where operators were already angry that the "Shooter" blabbed to the press. The fact that he allegedly told the wrong story compelled other operators to speak out, they say.

Though the CNN story doesn't mention it, the veracity of the Esquire story already came under criticism this week by Brandon Webb, a former Navy SEAL and editor of The Special Operations Forces Situation Report (SOFREP), a well-regarded blog that has close access to Navy SEALs. Just like CNN, Webb's report claims the "Shooter" wasn't the one who pulled the key shot."Sorry to rain on your parade," he writes. "But your guy is not the actual shooter."

It's worth mentioning that the CNN and SOFREP claims about who really took down bin Laden are also corroborated by the bestselling book No Easy Day by outed SEAL Team 6 member Matt Bissonnette. "Present and former members of SEAL Team 6 say they regard Bissonnette as more credible than the Shooter," says Bergen 

Interestingly, all of this controversy neglects the original reason the Esquire story came under criticism: It was discovered that the article's author, Phil Bronstein, failed to mention the medical benefits the "Shooter" was entitled to by the Department of Veterans Affairs. (The gist of the story was how the government abandoned the former Navy SEAL who became financially unstable after he left the service. Megan McCloskey at Stars and Stripes fact-checked the piece.) In Esquire's current issue, which just arrived on doorsteps, that mistake garnered a correction.

Regardless, in a statement from an Esquire spokeswoman, the magazine stands by its story:

The Esquire article, The Shooter: The Man Who Killed Osama Bin Laden, in the March 2013 issue, is based on information  from numerous sources, including members of Seal Team 6 and the Shooter himself, as well as detailed descriptions of mission debriefs.  We stand by our story.  

This morning Esquire editor-in-chief David Granger reiterated the magazine's position in a blog post on its website. 


What happened to the Jews of Egypt?

You wouldn't know it from walking around Cairo today, but there used to be a vibrant Jewish population in Egypt. Throughout the first half of the 20th century, this 80,000-strong community was a pillar of the country's political, economic, and cultural life -- and then it died out, collateral damage to the political and religious hatreds of the past six decades.

Today, a film opens in Cairo that aims to explain what happened. "Jews of Egypt" is the product of five years of work by director Amir Ramses, who self-funded the project with his producer, Haitham al-Khamissi. I sat down with Ramses in a Cairo cafe, and he explained to me that his documentary not only aims to explore the history of the country's Jewish community, but also to present a cautionary tale as Egypt goes through yet another period of upheaval.

"There's an attempt to narrow how you identify the word Egyptian: You have to be a certain religion, and a certain sect in that religion. But then also you have to have a certain political point of view, and an ethical point of view that matches what the majority thinks," Ramses said. "The film states clearly we were Jews, Christians, Muslims...That's how open-minded we were, that's how tolerant we were. I made the film as a warning sign to not lose that."

Ramses experienced firsthand how these ideas can still provoke government suspicion. Egypt's Culture Ministry stalled in issuing him a permit to screen "Jews of Egypt" commercially -- and finally, one day before the scheduled opening, he was informed that there would be a delay because the national security agencies had asked to review the film.

"Let's be honest, national security in Egypt has a paranoia...they themselves have this notion that I'm trying to fight in the movie, where every Jew is an Israeli Zionist spy who's working against the government," Ramses said. "They've been raised into this paranoia. Cheap adventure novels, comic books, even history books in school orient you to this."

Ramses credits the subsequent public outcry for his success in eventually gaining the government's approval to screen the film. But he still castigated the national security apparatus and the Culture Ministry for what he said was an illegal attempt to censor his film. "You just can't be a police agency and break the law," he said.

Even after clearing the government hurdles, Ramses still faces an uphill battle in healing the wounds of the past. The beginning of the end for Egypt's Jewish population came in 1948, when Egypt's declaration of war against Israel coincided with a series of bombings in Jewish neighborhoods and against Jewish-owned businesses -- spearheaded, according to historian Joel Beinin's The Dispersion of Egyptian Jewry, by the Muslim Brotherhood. In 1954, the disastrous Lavon Affair -- where Israeli intelligence agents recruited Egyptian Jews to bomb Western sites in Egypt in an effort to convince Britain to maintain control of the Suez Canal -- further heightened religious tensions.

The position of Egyptian Jews became completely untenable during the 1956 Suez War, where Israel, France, and Britain joined together in an attack on Egypt: In response, President Gamal Abdel Nasser's government promulgated emergency decrees that provided a pretext for the arrest of Jews without charge and the seizure of their priority. Many more Jews were expelled or fled -- in both cases, they were issued documents that explicitly stated they would not be allowed to return.

"The rule is that if you left after ‘56, and signed [a document saying] you will not come back to Egypt, if they forced you to do are still banned up until today," Ramses said. "Which is stupid -- we are at a point in history where we have a peace treaty with Israel, where Israelis who are not Egyptians can come to Egypt with just a stamp on their passport, while Egyptians who have never set foot in Israel...are still banned."

Absurd government restrictions, struggles over the place of minorities in society -- it all sounds familiar. The past is never dead. It's not even past.