One towering American historical figure played a key role in Mitt Romney's foreign-policy address at the Virginia Military Institute (VMI) on Monday: VMI graduate George Marshall. The Republican candidate noted that as Army chief of staff during World War II and later as secretary of state and secretary of defense, Marshall had helped "vanquish fascism and then
planned Europe's rescue from despair." He wove Marshall's contributions into his narrative about the "struggle between liberty and tyranny" taking place in the Middle East and the need for American leadership in the region:
We have seen this struggle
before. It would be familiar to George Marshall. In his time, in
the ashes of world war, another critical part of the world was torn between
democracy and despotism. Fortunately, we had leaders of courage and
vision, both Republicans and Democrats, who knew that America had to support
friends who shared our values, and prevent today's crises from becoming
Statesmen like Marshall rallied our
nation to rise to its responsibilities as the leader of the free world. We helped our friends to build and sustain free societies and free
markets. We defended our friends, and ourselves, from our common
enemies. We led. And though the path was long and uncertain, the
thought of war in Europe is as inconceivable today as it seemed inevitable in
the last century....
Sir Winston Churchill once said of
George Marshall: "He ... always fought victoriously against defeatism,
discouragement, and disillusion." That is the role our friends want
America to play again. And it is the role we must play.
Most of us have heard about the general's Marshall Plan for war-torn Europe. But what's less known -- and perhaps of interest to Romney, who's employed aggressive rhetoric against China -- is that, during the same period, Marshall faced withering criticism from figures such as Republican Senator Joseph McCarthy and U.S. General Douglas MacArthur for the 1945-1947 Marshall Mission, a failed effort to mediate China's civil war between the Nationalists and Communists, which Mao Zedong's forces ultimately won. In the early 1950s, as Republicans blamed Democrats for "losing China" to communism, McCarthy and MacArthur pointed fingers at Marshall and the Truman administration.
"It was one of the greatest blunders in American diplomatic history for which the free world is now paying in blood and disaster and will in all probability continue to do so indefinitely," MacArthur wrote in 1951, in reference to the Marshall Mission. He accused Marshall, who, as secretary of state, had opposed U.S. military intervention in the Chinese Civil War, of weakening the Nationalists by using "the potential of American assistance as a weapon" in trying to force the two sides to form a coalition government.
McCarthy was even harsher during a Senate speech several days later. Warning of "a conspiracy on a scale so immense as to dwarf any previous
such venture in the history of man," he turned to Marshall:
It was Marshall, with [Dean] Acheson
and [John Carter] Vincent eagerly assisting, who created the China policy which,
destroying China, robbed us of a great and friendly ally, a buffer against the
Soviet imperialism with which we are now at war.
It was Marshall who, after long
conferences with Acheson and Vincent, went to China to execute the criminal
folly of the disastrous Marshall mission....
It was Marshall who, disregarding [General
Albert Coady] Wedemeyer's advices on the urgent need for military supplies, the
likelihood of China's defeat without ammunition and equipment, and our "moral
obligation" to furnish them, proposed instead a relief bill bare of military
McCarthyism, of course, was later discredited, but not before McCarthy's positions forced Dwight Eisenhower to remove a tribute to Marshall, his mentor, during a 1952 campaign speech in Wisconsin.
All this isn't to say that Romney shouldn't have made Marshall's work an organizing theme in his address. But it does speak to the ironies of the GOP candidate invoking the statesman's legacy. Romney, for instance, demanded that the United States confront China's "assertiveness" (Republicans accused Marshall of appeasing Beijing), pledged to arm the Syrian rebels (the GOP slammed Marshall for not assisting the Chinese Nationalists militarily), promised to "reaffirm our historic ties to Israel" (Marshall urged Truman not to support a Jewish state), and called for conditioning U.S. aid to Egypt on the country's government embracing democracy and maintaining its peace treaty with Israel (in announcing the Marshall Plan, which did call for economic reforms in exchange for U.S. aid, Marshall declared that "our policy is directed not against any country or doctrine
but against hunger, poverty, desperation, and chaos").
As former Clinton administration speechwriter Heather Hurlburt put it today, Marshall's career was characterized by a "nuanced blend of diplomacy and strength." Some might argue that those nuances didn't make it into Romney's speech.