Apple has promised that the much-derided mapping software on its new iOS6 mobile operating system will improve soon, the BBC reports:
The BBC received a lot of complaints about Apple's maps, with users
saying that some towns, such as Stratford Upon Avon, were missing and
others were in the wrong place.
In addition some places, including a train station, were shown to be in the ocean and many others were wrongly labelled.
Before the release of the iOS6, Apple's updated mobile
operating system, many developers had warned about the poor quality of
the mapping app. It was particularly poor, they said, at finding local
businesses via search.
The most geopolitically significant of the map's glitches may be its depiction of the Senkaku/Diaoyu/Diaoyutai islands, which have been in the news a bit over the past two weeks. As the China Digital Times' Samuel Wade noticed, the maps very diplomatically created twice as many of the disputed rocks:
Problem solved. As Oprah would say, "You get an island! You get an island!"
See here for a collection of more particularly noteworthy mapping fails.
Don't let the numbers fool you. Barack Obama may be leading Mitt Romney by a two-to-one ratio in polls of Latino voters, and 58 percent of those voters may approve of the job the president is doing on immigration. But Obama's record on immigration isn't unassailable -- as the president's appearance at an Univision forum in Florida on Thursday, following Romney's participation in the same program yesterday, made clear.
Early on in the interview, for example, Univision host Jorge Ramos asked the president why he hadn't kept his pledge to Ramos in 2008 that "we will have in the first
year an immigration bill that I strongly support." Obama responded that unforeseen crises and partisanship -- and the limits of presidential power -- had torpedoed comprehensive immigration reform and specifically the DREAM Act, which stalled in the Senate in 2010 and would have offered legal status to undocumented immigrants who were brought to the United States as children and enrolled in college or joined the military.
"When we talked about immigration reform in the first year, that's before the economy was on the verge of collapse," Obama noted. "What I confess I did not expect," he added, "and so I'm happy to take responsibility for being naive here, is that Republicans who had previously supported comprehensive immigration reform ... suddenly would walk away." He later said his "biggest failure" was not passing immigration reform. Here's a clip from the interview:
Obama also had to address the fact that his administration has pursued a far more aggressive deportation policy than his predecessors, removing nearly 1.5 million illegal immigrants from the country since 2009 (according to PolitiFact, Obama has deported an average of 32,886 people per month, compared with 20,964 under Bush and 9,059 under Clinton). In his Univision interview, Obama argued that immigration authorities have focused on threats to the United States -- criminals, people apprehended at the border -- rather than illegal immigrants with clean records and deep roots in the country. According to government figures, roughly 50 percent of those deported in fiscal year 2012 were convicted criminals, and roughly 40 percent of the non-criminals were removed at or near the border (the group Obama didn't mention: the 50 percent of non-criminals who had repeatedly violated immigration law).
Additionally, Obama had to fend off the criticism that he had politics in mind when he issued an executive order in June halting the deportation of some young undocumented immigrants and allowing them to apply for work permits. The president told Univision's anchors that the executive order was a response to the stories he heard from young people across the country, and that he was winning the Latino vote long before he took the action.
Indeed, Obama's consistent advantage among Latinos may be the most interesting story here. The evidence suggests that Obama's record on immigration is a political liability. An AP-Univision poll in 2010 found that 56 percent of Hispanics felt Congress not passing a comprehensive immigration bill was a bad thing for the country, and a Pew Hispanic poll in 2011 reported that 59 percent of Latinos disapproved of Obama's deportation policy. By early 2012, a Univision News/ABC/Latino Decision poll found that 53 percent of Latinos were less excited about the president than when he took office (Obama regained some of that enthusiasm and widened his lead against Romney among Latinos after announcing his executive order in June).
During the Univision forum on Wednesday, Romney tried to exploit these very vulnerabilities. He criticized Obama for not fixing the immigration system in his first year as promised, and pledged to do so through measures such as increased border security, temporary work visas, and an employment verification system (something the president also supports). "We're not going to round up people around the country and deport them," he added. But Romney's softening immigration stance has yet to move the dial on Hispanic support. Conservative attacks on Obama from the left -- such as an ad in August condemning the administration's aggressive deportation policy -- haven't made a dent either.
Romney's positions on immigration may not be the only issue at play here. Polls consistently find that Latino voters care more about pocketbook such as jobs and the economy than they do about immigration. And, if the polling is any indication, Obama appears to be winning the economic argument among Latino voters -- whether or not he's fulfilled his promises on immigration.