The political news cycle on Wednesday was dominated by fiery exchanges between the Romney and Obama campaigns over the attacks on U.S. missions in Egypt and Libya, with Mitt Romney denouncing Obama's Middle East policy, the president calling his challenger trigger-happy, and the candidates' surrogates duking it out on cable television.
But both sides toned down the rhetoric substantially today. Obama vowed to bring those responsible for the attacks to justice but then reverted to his stump speech, while Romney noted the deaths of Americans before issuing a broad critique of the president's foreign policy (admittedly with an oblique reference to it seeming as if "we're at the mercy of events, instead of shaping events"). The Romney campaign didn't even pounce when the Obama administration walked back the president's statement last night that Egypt was not a U.S. ally.
Instead, the partisan bickering today took the form of media scorekeeping -- with debate coalescing around whether Romney's controversial critique marked a turning point in his campaign and whether the press treated the Republicancandidateunfairly.
Why the change? Perhaps both sides felt they'd had their say, or realized they wouldn't stand to benefit from saying more. Either way, I wonder if the silence will last with new protests in the Middle East planned for Friday.
A day after denouncing President Obama for his handling of attacks on U.S. missions in Egypt and Libya, Mitt Romney appears to be changing the subject. During a campaign stop in Virginia on Thursday, the Republican candidate veered away from the controversial critique, focusing on foreign-policy issues such as China instead.
Accusing Beijing of decimating American manufacturing by undervaluing its currency, Romney declared that he'll "call [the Chinese] on the carpet" if they continue to "cheat." Obama "had the
chance year after year to label China a currency manipulator, but he hasn't
done so," Romney added. "And I will label China the currency manipulator they are on the first
The Romney campaign complemented the speech with a new ad accusing Obama of "failing to stop cheating" by ceding manufacturing ground to China (the Obama campaign quickly shot off a press release pointing to manufacturing job growth since 2010 and the administration's seven trade complaints against China). At one point in the spot, Romney passionately tells a small audience on a factory floor that "it's time to stand up to the cheaters."
All of this makes me wonder: How are the Chinese, who are gearing up for their own leadership transition this fall, responding to all this cheating talk?
It turns out they don't care very much. And when they do, they don't see as much of a difference between the two candidates as you might think. After all, as a candidate in 2008 Obama bashed Beijing for manipulating its currency and accused George W. Bush of being a "patsy" in his trade negotiations with China. As Bloomberg's Adam Minter recently put it in an entertaining look at Chinese impressions of the U.S. election, Romney is "boiled cabbage next to Obama's boiled chicken."
China-bashing, many Chinese news outlets argue, has simply become par for the course in U.S. elections. Romney may be trying to "curry favor with hard right-wing elements in
the Republican Party" with his proposals on China, a recent op-ed in the state-run China Daily noted, but the Chinese people, "have become inured to such campaign talk from American politicians. Since the
end of the Cold War, both Democratic and Republican politicians have cited
former US policies toward China in attempts to rake up unsavory parts of each
other's pasts." The campaign rhetoric is "just meant to win votes and would prove disastrous if pursued," the writer adds.
An editorial late last month in the state-run Global Times -- entitled, "U.S. election pick barely matters for China" -- is even more dismissive and aggressive:
attracted less attention from the Chinese public than previous candidates. In
the recent few days, Chinese media has focused on a fleeing official and the inappropriate
behavior of a security supervisor at the site of a traffic accident.
China, the US matters less than before. Even though the majority of Chinese
think the US intends to contain China and are worried about potential
confrontation between the two sides, but the worry hasn't generated much
increasingly believe the biggest challenge for the country comes from within.
Washington cannot easily threaten us. Any move of the US against China will be
responded to accordingly.
So far, I'm not seeing much coverage of Romney's new ad in the Chinese press. Then again, I suppose that's not surprising.