Posted By Joshua Keating Share

While, for now unsubstantiated, coup rumors sweep China, a very real coup is underway in Mali. Renegade troups have appeared on state television to announce that they have taken power away from President Amadou Toumani Toure, who they say inadequately supported them in the fight against an ongoing insurgency by Tuareg rebels in the country's north. The army has apparently shut the borders and the whereabouts of Toure, who has been in power since 2002, are unknown. Soldiers are reportedly looting the presidential palace

Twitter's probably the best way to stay on top of the fast-moving story at the moment. Alex Thurston's Sahel Blog has some good suggestions of feeds to follow as well as some valuable quick analysis.

Given that it was only two years ago that the government of neighboring Niger was overthrown in a military coup, and just weeks since President Mohamed Nasheed of the Maldives was forced from office -- he claims -- at gunpoint, it's tempting to wonder whether military coups, which are often seen as a relic of Cold War ideological struggles, are returning to the world stage. (The SCAF's seizure of power in Egypt certainly exhibits some classic coup characteristics as well.)

So are we returning to a Cold War era level of coup occurence? Not really. Political scientists Nikolay Marinov and Hein Goemans plotted out this chart for their research on coup frequency in 2009:

 

As you can see, the two successful coups we've had this year were essentially the baseline throughout the 60s and 70s. Moreover, the coups that do happen today are more likely to end in at least semi-democratic elections. As Thurston writes of Niger:

Soldiers in Niger intervened to “reset” the civilian democracy after President Mamadou Tandja manipulated the constitution to stay in power. There was no war in Niger at the time. But in light of the coup in Niger, it is not surprising that the coup leaders in Mali have taken on the rhetoric of democracy, naming themselves the National Committee for the Restoration of Democracy and State (CNRDR) and saying, “We promise to hand power back to a democratically elected president as soon as the country is reunified and its integrity is no longer threatened.”

They may well make good on this promise. If the coup succeeds, there will be massive pressure – in a sense there already is - for Mali to hold elections. In Niger, although again, the situation was different, soldiers were in power for slightly longer than a year before organizing new elections.

Similarly, the Hondruan military leaders that overthrew the government of Manuel Zelaya in 2009 organized elections later that year. There are still a handful of governments run by leaders who took power in recent coups -- Fiji, Mauritania, and Madagascar, for instance -- but it's pretty rare. (The political future of the Maldives is still very much unsettled.) 

The reason is that in contrast to the Cold War era, there's generally considerable international pressure brought to bear against new military juntas, rather than incentives from ideologically-driven superpowers for them to remain in power. We're already seeing that pressure brought to bear in Mali:

The African Union said the "act of rebellion" was a "significant setback for Mali".

Kenya's Foreign Minister Moses Wetangula and his delegation are stranded in the country, as Bamako's airport is closed, after attending an AU meeting on peace and security.

The West African regional body Ecowas said the mutinous soldiers' behaviour was "reprehensible" and "misguided".

Additionally, the U.S. has pledged its support to Mali's previous government, and former colonial power France has suspended security cooperation since the coup.

All this means that if Mali's new military rulers are successful in their putsch, there will likely be enormous pressure to go ahead with the presidential election that was already scheduled for next month, and indeed they have already pledged to do so. Of course, with Tuareg rebels making major gains in the north of the country, a return to stability may be too much to hope for.

ISSOUF SANOGO/AFP/Getty Images

EXPLORE:THUMBS
 

AARONJA

2:18 PM ET

March 22, 2012

Their motives seem to be

Their motives seem to be purely opportunistic, a raw grab for power using the Tuareg conflict as a pretext. The current Malian president was due to stand-down anyway following next month's elections as he was not eligible for another term.

Hopefully the international community will bring these criminals to justice. A coup is a criminal act and they should be treated as such.

 

FUNKEDUP143

3:22 PM ET

March 22, 2012

How about a US Coup?

I'd pay to see that.

 

MAIGARI

4:59 PM ET

March 22, 2012

The Politicians Courted Disaster

Much as a democratic government is preferable to a military dictatorship, one has to look again at the way politicians run democracies in many an African nation. There is just so much opaqueness in the entire system and the elections are usually rigged to the point of impunity. In the specific instance of Mali, the West is partly to blame because the Tuareg rebellion has been a long festering conflict that got heavt armaments and probably cash infusions from the Libyan crisis. Unfortunately, not much atttention was paid to the consequences of rebels returning home after the fall of Ghaddafi and this is probably the beginning.

 

THUSALWAYSTOGENIUS

8:31 PM ET

March 22, 2012

De un: the CIA never left De

De un: the CIA never left
De deux: when your stomach is full, you tend to look mind your business

 

MATEO

9:56 PM ET

March 22, 2012

Don’t call it a comeback

they been here for years.

 

MUSICMASTER

11:43 AM ET

March 23, 2012

Democracy as a form is overrated

The goal of democracy should be to have real influence for the population. Many "democracies" hardly provide that. The Honduran election is a good example of that: many consider it a sham to prolong the junta rule. Elsewhere in the world it is not much different. Countries have learned that it is financially advantageous to have elections. But they also have learned the trick to make sure those elections don't provide unwanted outcomes.

One could even argue that the US - with its money-ruled politics - is now less democratic than it was a few decades ago.

 

Passport, FP’s flagship blog, brings you news and hidden angles on the biggest stories of the day, as well as insights and under-the-radar gems from around the world.

Read More