Thursday, March 15, 2012 - 3:10 PM

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov has an interesting definition of the word "provocative." After meeting with Secretary of State Hilary Clinton at the U.N. this week, Lavrov commented on March 14 that the recent resumption of U.S.-Georgia military exercises "seems somewhat provocative."
This might make sense if only Russia wasn't organizing military exercises of its own in the Caucasus. In December 2011, Russia announced a new strategic command-and-staff exercise, "Caucasus 2012," to take place in September 2012. The purpose is to prepare for a possible Israeli attack on Iran (and the potential repercussions in the Caucasus region). The exercises are to involve all areas of the armed forces, and will take place not only in the Russian territories of the North Caucasus, but also in neighboring Armenia, as well as the Georgian breakaway regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia (over which the 2008 war was fought).
It also conveniently occurs right before the scheduled parliamentary elections in Georgia for October 2012. The Georgian Foreign Ministry is obviously skeptical of these "military exercises" on its borders, claiming Russia is "seeking to instigate a permanent state of tension" in the region.
Then again, Russian foreign affairs rhetoric isn't exactly known for its consistency. Last year, during the NATO decision-making to provide the Libyan rebels with military assistance against Qadaffi, Russia's NATO ambassador Dimitri Rogozin commented that creating a no-fly zone over Libyan air space was "a serious interference into the domestic affairs of another country." Similar words came from Putin himself, who described the NATO mission as a "medieval call for a crusade ... [that] allows intervention in a sovereign state."
Ah, Putin condemning foreign military intervention
in a sovereign state. How quickly he forgot his intentions
in 2008.
KIRILL KUDRYAVTSEV/AFP/Getty Images
EXPLORE:CAUCASUS, EASTERN EUROPE, NORTH AFRICA, DEMOCRACY, GEORGIA, INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS, MILITARY, RUSSIA
I don't know that our foreign policy would change in large measure. I imagine we would be brought back to the superpower status we have enjoyed and taken for granted forever.Our bark would be more menacing than it is currently, eliminating the need to bite if necessary. Imposed sanctions would have more of an effect, and taking the lead to scale down our nuclear programs might be met with more enthusiasm. Intermediary positions during negotiations between other countries like Palestine and Israel and human rights issues in third world countries could be met with less contention, coming from a country that not only says it, but lives it. Until we get our own affairs in order, it's condescending and hypocritical for use to preach that which we don't do..
"Is rio orange war always forfait mobile inevitable ?"
MaximB
I think this, along with the fact that she's not taking question or doing interviews shows that she is not ready to be vice president and this was a hasty choice. They don't trust her enough to answer questions without possibly embarrassing or damaging the campaign......
"Is rio orange war always forfait sosh inevitable ?"
MaximB
Passport, FP’s flagship blog, brings you news and hidden angles on the biggest stories of the day, as well as insights and under-the-radar gems from around the world.
Read More
(2)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE