Monday, March 12, 2012 - 5:00 PM

Almost exactly a year ago, Saif al-Qaddafi made this puzzling accusation about French President Nicolas Sarkozy:
“Sarkozy must first give back the money he took from Libya to finance his electoral campaign. We funded it and we have all the details and are ready to reveal everything. The first thing we want this clown to do is to give the money back to the Libyan people. He was given assistance so that he could help them. But he’s disappointed us: give us back our money. We have all the bank details and documents for the transfer operations and we will make everything public soon.”
The allegation wasn't taken too seriously at the time, given the source. But it has resurfaced this week thanks to a report by the investigative website Mediapart, which includes a leaked document that it says proves that the Qaddafis financed Sarkozy's campaign to the tune of €50 million. The document had been part of the evidence in an investigation of the ties between Sarkozy's circle and a Middle Eastern arms dealer.
Huffington Post UK summarizes:
The documents make specific reference to Ziad Takieddine, a middle man in huge arms and petrol contracts between France and various Middle Eastern countries.
It is claimed Takieddine went to Tripoli 11 times to supervise the transaction in 2005, “the year where a payment of €50m (£42m) would have been concluded between the Libyans and Sarkozy camp.”
It also claims Brice Hortefeux, Sarkozy’s long time friend, advisor, and later interior minister, “intervened personally” in the financial operations. According to Mediapart, Hortefeux has denied any involvement in the events.
Mediapart said the document was “drafted and handed over to investigators by a witness to the dossier, Jean-Charles Brisard, ex member of (former prime minister) Eduard Balladur’s campaign team in 1995, now director of a private intelligence company.”
The cryptic three-line note published by MediaPart doesn't really seem like smoking gun, but the story's been picked up by other major media outlets in France. This isn't exactly welcome news for Sarkozy's struggling reelection campaign, particularly at a time when he's trying to outflank the far-right on culture war issues and Islam.
Sarkozy described the allegation as "grotesque" adding, "If [Qaddafi] did finance my campaign, I wasn't very grateful." It is true, as Issandr al-Amrani notes, that if Qaddafi did make an investment in Sarkozy, he didn't really get his money's worth from the president who spearheaded last year's bombing campaign.
I don't know that our foreign policy would change in large measure. I imagine we would be brought back to the superpower status we have enjoyed and taken for granted forever.Our bark would be more menacing than it is currently, eliminating the need to bite if necessary. Imposed sanctions would have more of an effect, and taking the lead to scale down our nuclear programs might be met with more enthusiasm. Intermediary positions during negotiations between other countries like Palestine and Israel and human rights issues in third world countries could be met with less contention, coming from a country that not only says it, but lives it. Until we get our own affairs in order, it's condescending and hypocritical for use to preach that which we don't do..
"Is rio orange war always forfait mobile inevitable ?"
MaximB
To not only survive as a nation, with as much power as could be wrested from the USSR, but also to stick their noses in to the business of the world and keep all other nations from becoming communist, since people who aren't only looking out for their own make Americans nervous..
"Is rio orange war always comparateur forfait inevitable ?"
MaximB
Your kidding right? You realize that Rahm Emmanuel's father was an Israeli commando and that he still heavily favors Israel. Never gonna happen..
"Is rio orange war always forfait sosh inevitable ?"
MaximB
Really where is the decency in all this, going to the extent of publishing private mails? Whatever wrong is atttrinutable to Bashar, the West is aquarely part of the problem having "tolerated dictatorships" in the region all this long. Forty years plus ruling, what forfait mobile happens to the Kingdoms and even Iran before the Shah was booted out?
Continue on this Sectarian inspired Spring and wait for the double consequences, The consequence of having to deal with the much maligned islamists and more importantly, expose the duplicity of the West once again when the citizens of the Kingdoms rise up for their rights to Universal Franchise as we all saw in Bahrain and Yemen which is solidly supported by the "leader of the free nations".
Passport, FP’s flagship blog, brings you news and hidden angles on the biggest stories of the day, as well as insights and under-the-radar gems from around the world.
Read More
(4)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE