Amusingly, as the New York Times points out, after they gave conflicting stories for the odd vote they ultimately gave all 1,389 votes to Putin - even though by their own claims one of those votes should have gone to Putin's 'opponent'.

If Putin wins at least 110% at the next election, he will have the mandate necessary to legally enact changes in mathematical equations.

From FP story, Kill the Messenger":

" It was a combination of brutal tactics -- a Stalinist purge of fighting-age males plus Orwellian propaganda that fed Russians a narrative wherein Chechen freedom fighters were transformed into Islamist mercenaries and terrorists. More than 200,000 civilians were to die in this war, the echoes of which continue to this day."

I strongly suspect that a correct count of the ballots cast in that precinct was very close to (if not exactly) "The final tally: Putin, 1,482 votes; Gennady A. Zyuganov, the Communist Party leader, one vote. " I think the problem was a not very competent election commission that failed to correctly report the number of people on the "supplementary list." The author should become more familiar with Russian election law. There were many precincts in Moscow City and Moscow Oblast with about 200 to 300 registered voters that had 600 to over 1000 votes cast for Putin. That gives a turnout of more than 200% to 300% in those precincts by the author's way of calculating. And all those for Putin were "technically legal" by Russian election law, although there are reasons to doubt the strict legality.

Why make a mountain out of a molehill when there are plenty of real mountains?

Vain Human Gods will never admit liability or errors. And certainly you see by the answers that follow that what I say is true. Their answers are so perfect as to never admit liability or mistake. And they are sure to put you in your place, below their feet. (I'm also long haired freaky person, as yourself) Look at them, they even are sure that they know exactly what the Muslims are fighting for. How do you suppose that they know all that, huh? They are so eager to believe U.S. government propaganda, aren't they?.

"Is rio orange war always comparateur forfait mobile inevitable ?"
MaximB

if the allies had put stricter measures on germany about keeping to the treaty of versile then germany wouldnt have rebuilt its armed forces and had to caperbility to invade the rhyne land czchoslivakia and poland the invasion of poland leading to france and britain declaring war on germany.

"Is rio orange war always forfait mobile illimite inevitable ?"
MaximB

It meant that many of our former ''allies'' do not feel threatened and not can show their appreciation by calling us war mongers/threat to world peace.

"Is rio orange war always forfait mobile inevitable ?"
MaximB

The author should become more familiar with Russian election law. There were many precincts in Moscow City and Moscow Oblast with about 200 to 300 registered voters that had 600 to over 1000 votes cast for Putin. That gives a turnout of more than 200% to 300% in those precincts wideboots by the author's way of calculating. And all those for Putin were "technically legal" by Russian election law, although there are reasons to doubt the strict legality.