Wednesday, February 29, 2012 - 12:13 PM

Haitian President Michel Martelly has, for months, faced accusations that he holds a U.S. passport, making him ineligible for his office. Now, the country's senate has taken up the debate, as the newspaper Haiti Liberté reports:
Two weeks ago, Sen. Moïse Jean Charles submitted what he called “irrefutable” evidence to a special Senate Select Committee that Martelly and 38 other high government officials hold dual, and sometimes triple, nationalities.
On Jan. 24, Sen. Joseph Lambert, the Commission’s president, announced in a press conference that the Commission has confirmed dual nationality for two of the 10 cases it has investigated to date. However, Lambert has so far refused to release the names of dual citizenship officials, saying his commission would proceed “impartially” and “without emotion.” He said arrangements have been made to continue the nationality investigations overseas.
The Senate inquiry threatens to create a political crisis which may force President Martelly, his Prime Minister Garry Conille, and other ministers to step down. If the charges against him prove true, it means that candidate Martelly lied to election officials about holding dual citizenship, which current Haitian law explicitly forbids for a high elected official.[...]
Meanwhile, the Senate’s Vice President Andrice Riché said it was “scandalous that a foreign citizen can deceive the vigilance of Haitian institutions to enjoy privileges to which he is not entitled.” He argued that “these citizens would have nothing against [Haiti’s military] occupation” by UN troops, because “they are true to nothing.” Sen. Riché argued that “giving up Haitian nationality is an act of treason and the authors of such an act should not have responsibilities in the management and decision making for the country. If you said no to Haitian nationality, you said no to the country.”
For an explainer piece last year looking at the question of whether Barack Obama might be eligible to run for president of some other country after producing his long-form U.S. birth certificate. Not every country's constitution is quite as specific as America's when it comes to the lifelong citizenship status of their heads of state. Haiti's is, however:
To be elected President of the Republic of Haiti, a candidate must:
a. Be a native-born Haitian and never have renounced Haitian nationality;
b. Have attained thirty-five (35) years of age by the election day;
c. Enjoy civil and political rights and never have been sentenced to death, personal restraint or penal servitude or the loss of civil rights for a crime of ordinary law;
d. Be the owner in Haiti of at least one real property and have his habitual residence in the country;
e. Have resided in the country for five (5) consecutive years before the date of the elections;
f. Have been relieved of this responsibilities if he has been handling public funds.
The five consecutive years requirement was what foiled Wyclef Jean's presidential aspirations last year. The constitution also states that any citizen that holds a foreign passport automatically renounces his Haitian citizenship, which is the rap against Martelly. Sweet Micky denies the charge:
“It’s a conspiracy organized by people who can’t believe Michel Martelly is [going to be] the country’s President,” Martelly, aka “Sweet Micky,” told a Port-au-Prince radio station. “I’m Haitian, I never renounced my citizenship, my passport is Haitian.”
There doesn't seem to be any credible proof to the contrary. But it also seems that given the number of people who've fled Haiti's violence, poverty, and natural disasters over the last two decades, barring them from returning to serve in office is a bit impractical.
Hat tip: Marginal Revolution
ERIC PIERMONT/AFP/Getty Images
that's just great!
A number of storylines have emerged from the wake of the 8.9 magnitude earthquake and subsequent tsunami that struck the northern coast of Japan last week. The newfound aversion to nuclear energy has potentially huge ramifications for low-carbon energy plans, and there are a host of multilateral organizations working to alleviate suffering in the hardest hit areas. But in trying to come up with blog posts on these topics, it was almost impossible to get past the magnitude of human tragedy that has gripped that country. A piece in the New York Times describes the town of Rikuzentakata, in which one in ten of its 23,000 inhabitants are dead or missing. The entire high school swim team is gone–no one has seen the swimmers since the earthquake almost two weeks ago. Stories such as this are only too common in the aftermath of the earthquakes and tsunami that rocked the north coast of Japan. This is a tragedy of almost unspeakable proportions.
But in trying to focus on some good to come out of this story, we turn our attention to the quick action of the G7 last week, which took measures to weaken the Yen relative to other major global currencies. Japan is going to need a lot of cash on hand to rebuild (the Japanese government estimates it’s going to take $309 billion to get everything back into shape), which means that the Japanese government is going to have some extra-stuffed treasuries in the next couple of years (SPOILER ALERT: THERE’S ECON COMING UP). For ForeX traders, that means there’s going to be more scarcity of Yen (the Japanese government has all of the Yen!), which means Japan’s currency will be worth more. So in responding to market incentives, investors all over the world scrambled to buy up Yen, which hit an all-time high relative to the dollar.
That’s great if you’re a pensioner, because your monthly check stays the same while imported stuff cost less. But for everyone else in Japan, a strong Yen would cause the economy to tank. Companies like Toyota, Sony, and Hitachi rely on exporting goods and services abroad, and their revenues serve as the lifeblood of the Japanese economy. When the Yen is strong, these companies have a lot harder time competing with other cheaper firms, as customers choose the least expensive options. This lowers these companies’ revenues and depresses the Japanese economy as a whole. So, in order to stabilize Japan’s fragile recovery, the G7 pumped a lot of Yen into the global economy, lowering the scarcity of the Yen, and making it less powerful relative to major currencies (END ECON SPOILER).
What’s remarkable about the G7’s actions over the last week isn’t their economics, but their alacrity. Multilateral institutions get a bad rep for responding slowly to disasters and having their actions watered down by various interest groups and consensus voting (think the UN mission to Rwanda). The G7 beat those expectations twofold: not only did the finance ministers of the seven largest economies act in concert within a week of the disaster, but they acted in an effective manner that, at least for now, is working. They also worked to allay fears over future currency appreciation like a boss, and committed to intervene again if the Yen gets stronger down the road–all in less than two weeks after the disaster. In the words of our era’s Tennysons, the G7 is so fly, it should be called the G6.
The fact is that multilateral institutions can be just as dynamic as domestic parliaments. There will always be issues that are more controversial than others, which will naturally require more deliberation. But in clear-cut cases of need, like Japan, multilateral institutions have shown they can step in and do the right thing. Maybe it’s time they get a new rep.
Please give: to provide relief to Japanese survivors, you can donate to the International Red Cross at their website, or text REDCROSS to 90999 to instantly donate $10.
Japan has been one of the greatest international contributors to international relief efforts around the world. Please help give a little bit back.
great blog post. i like it a lot.
propaclean is the best cleaning services in london and we have been providing our services
from many years.we are providing our service in residential and commercial properties
of London and other places of London. If you need any cleaning services work then feel
free to contact us at Tel: 0845 634 1101 or AFTER office HOURS: 07950 743 855
Thank you
cleaning services london
No, they were testing their weapons before and they are doing it now. Bush had a "strong" foreign policy. With strong I mean "we will blow your ass up" kinda strategy. It didn't work. They still tested their weapons and admitted to the world that they had numerous nukes and were getting more. Obama is "softer". He uses diplomacy and well it doesn't work either. It has NOTHING to do with what kind of foreign policy is used : strong or weak. It has ALL to do with a nuthead leader who is flexing his muscles for the whole world to see..
"Is rio orange war always comparateur forfait mobile inevitable ?"
MaximB
I think Palin was only selected to siphon off disenfranchised Hillary voters. Unfortunately identity politics seem to play a huge role in this election..
"Is rio orange war always forfait mobile inevitable ?"
MaximB
Passport, FP’s flagship blog, brings you news and hidden angles on the biggest stories of the day, as well as insights and under-the-radar gems from around the world.
Read More
(4)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE