Posted By Uri Friedman Share

During this year's Republican primary, Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich, and Rick Santorum have all suggested that they would use military force if necessary to dismantle Iran's nuclear program. And tensions between Washington and Tehran have only increased as speculation swirls about an imminent Israeli attack on Iranian nuclear facilities, Iranian officials trumpet their nuclear advances, and mysterious bombings appear to target Israeli diplomats in Georgia, India, and Thailand. 

But how does the American public view the situation in Iran? New polling from the Pew Research Center this morning suggests that Americans are in a rather bellicose mood when it comes to confronting Iran, and pessimistic about the power of sanctions to keep Tehran from obtaining a nuclear weapon.

In the survey, 58 percent of respondents said it was more important to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons, even if that meant taking military action. Only 30 percent preferred avoiding a military conflict even if it meant Iran going nuclear. Republicans (74 percent) were far more supportive of using military force than Democrats (50 percent), but Democratic backing was still substantial.

Around half of Americans, meanwhile, believe the United States should remain neutral if Israel strikes Iran. But, as Pew points out, more respondents said the United States should support (39 percent) Israel than oppose (5 percent) it. A majority of Republicans think the United States should back Israel while a majority of Democrats think it should stay neutral. 

Pew notes that there are nuances in the data as well. Women and young people, for example, are more likely to support the United States staying neutral in an Israeli-Iranian conflict. And, not surprisingly, conservative Republicans, including Tea Party supporters, are more likely to champion American support of Israeli military action than moderate or liberal Republicans.

Where there's more agreement across the aisle is in the belief that tough economic sanctions -- a tactic the Obama administration continues to pursue -- will be ineffective in persuading Iran to abandon its nuclear program. Sixty-four percent of the public thinks these measures will not work, compared with 56 percent in October 2009.

Of course, supporting military force if it means preventing Iran from developing nuclear weapons (in other words, approving of it as a last resort) isn't the same as a full-throated endorsement of the military option. In a Quinnipiac University poll in November, 36 percent of respondents supported the use of force in any case, while an additional 14 percent backed the option if sanctions failed. In a CNN/ORC survey around the same time, more than six in 10 respondents selected "economic and diplomatic efforts" -- not "military action right now" -- as the best U.S. policy toward Iran's nuclear program.

If Americans are so down on economic sanctions as an effective solution, however, one wonders whether they're beginning to resign themselves to a military conflict, even if they have little appetite for it.

Mario Tama/Getty Images

 

WILDTHING

4:45 PM ET

February 15, 2012

Bully Market, Bully Pulpits, bully for us...

So force is always the best solution and since we are the world's only super-ego we get to force anything we want any time we want. So invading Iraq for lies is fine and now the the next axis of evils is in the line of our sights and any story that gives us the gratification of destruction is fine with us...nuke programs and wmds... lot of countries are on the brink of nuclear power with their reactors not a problem but Iran has been in our sights ever since the revoution to throw our the secret cia trained police and since Iraq couldn't do it for us now we think force by us would be good... never mind our disregard for international law make a country want a nuclear deterrence more... and like the romans giving too much power to the military eventually leasd to be taken over by them and the military police state here at home is well on the way by now. Force abroad can encourage force at home... force like our civil war or revolution never solves anything ..old wars never die they come back to haunt us... as we aspire not to escape the British Empire but become it...

 

JENNYASDF94

1:39 AM ET

February 16, 2012

Who Actually Effect By the Circumstances?

Force is not always the best solution; it should be the least option for you still if you have the power.
Plaguing without justifications can cause more drastic results. Agreed that it’s the leaders who do determine the war situations or country policies for fight. But are they actually the people who effected by their own decisions NO, NO, NO.
It’s the public of the country. So no war please.
Nixon

 

JUPITER

2:34 AM ET

February 16, 2012

We really ARE dumb enough to make the same mistake thrice!

God forbid Israel's nuclear arsenal only outnumbers Iran's by 199 instead of 200.

 

KOSTTILSKUD GUIDE

9:21 AM ET

February 16, 2012

Iran - Why we go to war again.

It is really surprising how naive most of the world population is when it comes to be manipulated to gain support for the war. Iran is a really well-educated people, and probably one of the last places on earth with a non-Western-democracy lobby. Iran has made the big mistake that they have threatened to introduce the gold standard and stop trading oil for dollars, and instead switch to another currency. Iran is the last place on earth (North Korea excepted) which are not under Western influence - and so it is now their time to be tilted and be subject to Western influence. I "Guide Til Kosttilskud" seriously don't hope Israel will begin an invasion or US supported strike against Iran - since this will lead to nothing except profit for major multinational corporations.

 

DR. SARDONICUS

9:59 PM ET

February 16, 2012

Most Americans on what planet? Do you listen to yourselves?

Just like during Iraq and Afghanistan, pundits, neocon pinheads and Big Money have fallen-in and dress-right-dressed for the next mandatory formation of wasting peasants en masse with contract mercenaries, robots, and billion dollar, stand-off “weapons systems.” America all dressed up as corporate bully and sadistic coward of the village, for profit and nothing else. You should be ashamed.

However, I have yet to hear any of them – Israeli or American – say how we are going to get OUT of this next conflict without another five-figure-plus casualty roster, another trillion dollar swindle by the military-prison-industrial complex, and another decade spent hyperactively losing it, fair and square. Always doing the wrong thing, never doing the right thing, and all agog when things don’t go swimmingly!

This assuming that the American public is stupid enough to stick yet another arm into yet another threshing machine at black flag op provocation and Truth Speak media command. Fifty percent of Americans want to invade Iran: my shiny white ass they do.

I suppose that would be one way to downsize the Great White Elephant Fleet: lose a couple A/C carriers to land-based cruise missiles controlled by motorbike messengers. Then scream for twice as many in half the time. The Navy hardly fattened itself at all at the trough of the last two, land-bound swindles. I suppose that would be one way to puff up defense spending, now that the Pentagon is beginning to gasp and flail like a fish out of water…

Reminds me of the good old days of a potential Peace Dividend. Recall?

Fat chance with this sorry crowd.

 

JAC323

11:05 PM ET

February 18, 2012

Is your bunker well stocked?

That is the general population for you, some guy with a fancy suit and a Rolax watch tells them Iran is a threat so they must be a threat. (can't think, will not think for themselves) I have to wonder about some of the ruling elite with their never-ending, plodding black logic They want to attack Iran but this assumes that Russia and China will stay out of the conflict, a big assumption, because if you are wrong it could lead to WWlll. Of course, some of the elite think they can crawl out of their bunkers in a few years when it is all over. Madness.

 

DDT000

10:21 AM ET

February 20, 2012

Mossadeq

Those who are not students of history are doomed to repeat it...

George Washington University's
National Security Archive
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB28/
1953 Iran Coup

I wonder where Iran would be now if the Dulles Brothers (USA) hadn't undermined a burgeoning democracy... and since we have marginalized and radicalized Iran through terrorism (our buddy the Shah of Iran was indeed a murderous bastard who terrorized his citizens for decades with our backing), creating current conditions (not sure if there is a situation, as this smells very much like Iraq), are we now simply the fools Eisenhower warned us not to be?

(BTW, this article lacked the depth and insight I expect from FP.)

 

WILDTHING

3:52 PM ET

February 24, 2012

are we feeling lucky...

Iran may have achieved nuclear ambiguity already or do we trust the intelligence like we did for Iraq... perhaps they could have the idea of live testing a weapon rather than tipping everyone off beforehand... live testing is all the rage these days...
like experimenting on ourselves with all manner of social engineering and behavioral conditioning... particularly conditioning for a permanent war-based system built on a foundation of pure paranoia, ptsd, homeland security with checkpoints all over the place and people manning them with nervous trigger fingers and a database full of extraneous personal information for everyone to base their processing of you on.
Then just for good measure start up a religious war over who get to control the most faith based initiative money... and gets to run of morality policing policies too...

 

BERTRAMDICKSON

3:09 AM ET

March 14, 2012

However, I have yet to hear

However, I have yet to hear any of them – Israeli or American – say how we are going to get OUT of this next conflict without homerenovations another five-figure-plus casualty roster, another trillion dollar swindle by the military-prison-industrial complex, and another decade spent hyper-actively losing it, fair and square. Always doing the wrong thing, never doing the right thing, and all agog when things don’t go swimmingly!

 

Passport, FP’s flagship blog, brings you news and hidden angles on the biggest stories of the day, as well as insights and under-the-radar gems from around the world.

Read More