Posted By Blake Hounshell Share

The sudden resignation Tuesday morning of Al Jazeera director-general Wadah Khanfar sent shockwaves through the Arab media world, leading to intense speculation about whether the relative freedom the satellite network had enjoyed is about to come to an end.

In his 8 years at the helm of the network, Khanfar built it into a news powerhouse in the Middle East and beyond, angering the United States and nearly every Arab regime and -- arguably -- helping take a few of them down. He presided over the opening of Al Jazeera English, the widely praised international spinoff, which recently pried open the U.S. cable market after years of a de facto boycott. Al Jazeera's Arabic-language reporters, in particular, have taken bold risks to report the news, and not only during the Arab Spring. Some of them have paid with their lives.

Khanfar is at the top of his game. So why did he resign? In his departing note to staff, he said only that it was because he had "decided to move on" and that he had been discussing his "desire to step down" for some time.

"Upon my appointment," he wrote, "the Chairman and I set a goal to establish Al Jazeera as global media leader and we have agreed that this target has been met and that the organization is in a healthy position."

But is that the whole story? A couple theories are making the rounds, none of which seem to be based on any inside information. So what follows is purely speculative.

One potential clue is Khanfar's replacement: Ahmed bin Jassim Al Thani, a member of the royal family. Al Thani is not a journalist; he is an executive at QatarGas, a state-affiliated natural gas producer. Given that the chairman is Hamad bin Thamer Al Thani, another royal family member, this may not ultimately be such a big deal. But the optics certainly don't look good.

There were already strong reasons to question just how much editorial independence the network really has. The U.S. State Department clearly views Al Jazeera as a tool of Qatar's foreign policy; one cable from November 2009 claims that the Persian Gulf state uses the channel "as a bargaining tool to repair relationships with other countries, particularly those soured by al-Jazeera's broadcasts, including the United States." Al Jazeera devotes suspiciously little time to covering the politics of the Gulf; for instance, after Qatar's rapprochement with Saudi Arabia, criticism of the Saudi royal family dropped dramatically.

In recent weeks, the details of conversations between U.S. officials and Al Jazeera executives, including Khanfar, had been the subject of much chatter in the Arab world (Omar Chatriwala details that story for FP here). One October 2005 cable describes U.S. officials presenting Khanfar with the findings of a Defense Intelligence Agency report complaining about the network's coverage, and him agreeing to remove a particularly inflammatory slideshow from Al Jazeera's website. The cable was taken out of context and seized upon by the network's critics as evidence of a CIA-Qatari conspiracy to manipulate Arabs in the service of U.S. foreign-policy goals.

Middle East Online is running with the headline "WikiLeaks topples Al Jazeera director." But if Khanfar somehow had to resign because of the cable controversy, which has hurt Al Jazeera's credibility in certain quarters, it doesn't wash that his replacement would be a member of the Qatari royal family. Middle East Online also reports that unnamed Qatari officials were already looking to cashier Khanfar over a supposed dispute with Azmi Bishara, a Palestinian intellectual and former Knesset member who lives in Doha (and appears frequently on Al Jazeera).

So perhaps something else is going on. My sense from watching the Arabic network's coverage over the past few months is that it had more or less dropped the pretense of independence, and at times seemed like the official network of the Qatari Foreign Ministry. For instance, its Libya coverage was utterly over-the-top, enthusiastic cheerleading for the rebels -- and it just so happened that Qatar was heavily engaged in overthrowing Muammar al-Qaddafi. When Qatar brokered a peace agreement between warring factions in Darfur, Al Jazeera broke away from its normal coverage for two hours to show the final announcement. And, as many have noted, the Arabic channel's usual aggression has been noticeably lacking when it comes to Bahrain.

It's hard to imagine a hard-charging guy like Khanfar -- who clearly has his own ideological leanings -- putting up with that sort of thing for very long. So maybe he just didn't want to toe anybody's line. Whatever the reason, Arabs will be watching closely to see if his successor clips Al Jazeera's wings.

Correction: Ahmed bin Jassim Al Thani is not a former minister of commerce, as I originally wrote. And QatarGas is technically state-affiliated but not state-owned.

KAREN BLEIER/AFP/Getty Images

 

ANNAMIRNADA

12:23 AM ET

September 21, 2011

everything comes to an end

Past few months we have seen some great people leave their positions. It started with the techcrunch the guy left after the AOL drama and now this.

To be honest Al Jazeera was decent it was never that amazing and I reckon that type of news was always available around many other channels I saw a lot in India and other countries I am not sure why people think it was the best thing happened?

If the guy stepped down then that is very good for him. I reckon he saw an end to all this being too HONEST. It is same like many other careers for instance when I was getting my phlebotomy certification I was still working in mashable but I had to quit because I just couldn't continue the blogging and the work. May be he has found a work or something.

my 2 cents.

 

NISREEN

1:33 AM ET

September 21, 2011

ALjazeera decade ended a while AGO

him leaving is not the sign of the ending decade of Al Jazeera. it ended with Bahrain protests when it showed double faced coverage . As an arab i was one of those who had a little faith in Al Jazeera. but it turned out to be one big disappointment.

Qatar as a whole was a big disappointment , hailing NATO strikes in lybia . ignoring Bahrain .. focusing on Syria.

even the revolution in Egypt it was covered by any chance in a professional way , but maybe because we hated Mubarak so much we did not mind, latter stories came out about both sides but not on Al Jazeera.

Qatar with it Al Jazeera has become so full of them selves . They deny it but they have lost a huge number of followers .

i am not sad he left , bringing a member of the royal family is so funny.
Hail the Qatari democracy .

this is how it was an always be.. royal families in the middle east all are the same.. they lecture democracy but when it comes to them they will never apply it .

khanfar is no angel .. wiki proves it . he deserves what happened to him.

 

KUNINO

2:53 PM ET

September 21, 2011

Looking in the wrong direction

A much bigger issue in the American context -- at which, largely, FP is aimed -- is how very poor American TV news of international affairs has been for some decades. The former-Lehrer NewsHour does its best on what seems to be virtually zero budget, with virtually all its foreign coverage bought in from the British Independent Television News (Britishers informing the British), but it's not a very good news service for America.

It's also obvious that alJazeera English service has been, for little visible reason, something of a bogeyman to the US . Those fortunate enough to see the English-speaking service become aware quickly that it's put together by professional English-speaking journalists and presenters, few or none of whom seem to be Muslims, and none of whom are blatant propagandists for anti-western understandings.

The Hounshell reference to aJ's "utterly over-the-top, enthusiastic cheerleading for the [Libyan] rebels" is of course grotesque. aJ was no more over the top in this than the main western TV news services, who don't know who those rebels are but have been forcing virtually sycophantic news coverage of their efforts into our homes for some months.

We do know those rebels are disparate group, we know they assassinated one of their own leaders a few weeks ago, and it seems that they've been arresting and beating up lots of migrant workers in Libya for reasons that seem connected with the colours of their skin. (Hint: black skin.) In early days we were offered "news" coverage that could not conceal images of rebel idiots discharging their rare and precious ammunition at the sky and conducting themselves with the gusto and incompetence of little boys playing soldiers in a garden, without any suggestion that this wasn't the best way to go about things. Wag the dog indeed. There has also been no or little coverage of who -- likely not Libyans -- who have been training them in more professional combat skills in recent weeks.

You don't have to be a Gaddafi supporter to wonder exactly what's been guiding that damn fool domestic coverage, but over-the-top, enthusiastic cheerleading for the rebels seem a pretty good description of it.

 

Passport, FP’s flagship blog, brings you news and hidden angles on the biggest stories of the day, as well as insights and under-the-radar gems from around the world.

Read More