Tuesday, August 16, 2011 - 4:53 PM

This week, in response to a FOIA request from the National Security Archives project at George Washington University, the CIA released most of its top-secret internal history of the 1961 Bay of Pigs invasion. The 1200 page history was written between 1974 and 1984 by Jack Pfeiffer, who later became the agency's official historian. Four of the five volumes have now been posted on the NSA's website. A fifth volume, which critique's the Agency's own internal review of the incident is still classified.
The released documents contain a number of interesting revelations including a friendly-fire incident during which one of the CIA transport boat shot at one of the invasion force's own planes. Most interesting for presidential historians may be the minutes of a briefing meeting of a CIA task force preparing for a briefing of President-Elect Kennedy on Nov. 15, 1960, during which the they expressed skepticism about whether the mission was viable with the small invasion force that the administration insisted upon, in order to maintain plausible deniability.* They wrote:
Our [CIA's] original concept is now seen to be unachievable in the face of the controls Castro has institutued. There will not be the internal unrest earlier believed possible, nor will the defenses permit the type strike first planned. Our second concept (1,500-3,000 man force to secure a beach with airstrip) is also now seen to be unachievable, except as a joing Agency/DOD action. Our Guatemala experience demonstrates we cannot staff nor otherwise timely create the base and lift needed.
Reviewing the (still-classified) minutes decades later, Pfeffer wrote:
How, if in mid-November 1960 the concept of the 1,500-3,000 man force to secure a beachhead with an airstrip was envisioned by the senior personnel ... as "unachievable" except as a joint CIA/DOD effort, did it become "achievable" in March 1961 with only 1,200 men and as an Agency operation?
Good question, and perhaps some more ammunition for Tom Ricks' contention that Kennedy was "the worst American president of the previous century."
*Correction: It appears I misread the document and inaccurately wrote that the minutes were from a meeting with Kennedy, rather than a meeting to prepare for his briefing. Kennedy was never informed of the CIA task force's conclusion that the mission was unachievable. I apologize for the error and the cheap shot at President Kennedy.
AFP/Getty Images
As the national Security archive writes in its introduction page on the issues: "This candid assessment was not shared with the President-elect then, nor later after the inauguration. "
Why is Keating asserting something different?
http://www.moonofalabama.org/2011/08/fps-keating-lying-about-kennedys-cuba-briefing.html
That makes Keating the expert. He apologizes after the lie. Thought that was nice. No correction of the original falsehood.
How are you so confident that Kennedy saw these reports?
Kennedy's close advisor Ted Sorensen (Counsellor, start of chapter on Kennedy's Foreign Policy) wrote that although such skeptical reports by less senior staff were later shown to have existed, these doubts were hidden from Kennedy by his most senior military and intelligence staff. According to Sorensen, the plan had apparently largely been formulated under the Eisenhower administration. Kennedy blamed himself for following the advice of his experts, and thereafter took a far more critical approach to their recommendations.
Kennedy, Vietnam and Iraq
The evidence is clear: JFK decided to withdraw from Vietnam a month before he was assassinated. Setting the record straight is crucial as Baghdad continues to explode.
By James K. Galbraith
http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2003/11/22/vietnam/print.html
Yeah, right, unachievable. What they was finking? That Invasion to Cuba would be more difficult than D-day? Just there was no need to invate that little island without any strategically value, it's not like they have oil...
Sincerely,
Nuliz
- Zaliuzes klaipedoje
According to Sorensen, the plan had apparently largely been formulated under the Eisenhower administration. Kennedy blamed himself for following the advice of his experts, and thereafter took a far homeprojects more critical approach to their recommendations.
Yeah, right, unachievable. What they was finking? That Invasion to Cuba would be more difficult than D-day best? Just there was no need to invate that little island without any strategically value, it's not like they have oil.
Passport, FP’s flagship blog, brings you news and hidden angles on the biggest stories of the day, as well as insights and under-the-radar gems from around the world.
Read More
(7)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE