Posted By Robert Zeliger Share

Europeans know a thing or two about down-to-the-wire debt deals, but with time running out in Washington to reach an agreement before a catastrophic default that could have devastating spillover effects around the globe, European leaders are sweating.  On Tuesday, Christine Lagarde, the managing director of the International Monetary Fund and former finance minister of France, warned the United States that the issue needed to be "resolved immediately."  Today, she told the PBS NewsHour that there would be dire consequences for the world economy if there wasn't resolution.

There's quite a lot of concern out there. The global economy is clearly highly dependent on the U.S. economy, because the U.S. economy is the first in the world and it's a major power in many respects. So to have the lead economy uncertain about its debt ceiling is quite worrisome.

In a separate interview with Fareed Zakaria on CNN, she said the solution would be to raise the debt ceiling now and address fiscal consolidation issues in the medium term.

Today, the German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schäuble also warned Washington to act.

Everyone in the US should be aware of their responsibility for the global financial markets.

He added, "The core of [the U.S.'s] difficulties is exorbitant debt and the economic prospects. Americans have to find long-term solutions to create solid fiscal and growth policies."

Schäuble and Lagarde were downright tame compared to Vince Cable, Britain's secretary of state for business, who told the BBC earlier this week that "the biggest threat to the world financial system comes from a few rightwing nutters in the American Congress rather than the euro zone."

Perhaps, the most sobering analysis of all comes from Germany's Der Spiegel:

Even if the worst is avoided, US finances are still a mess. Total debt is approaching 100 percent of gross domestic product, putting it in the same league as Italy, Portugal and Ireland, three of the euro-zone's famous PIIGS states. America's budget deficit is well over a trillion dollars -- more than 10 percent of GDP. Were Washington to apply to become a member of the European common currency zone, it would be rejected out of hand.

We'd be rejected by the euro zone? This euro zone?

AFP/Getty Images

 

AXELBROOK

2:27 PM ET

August 18, 2011

Earth to Karl!!!!! Why not.

Earth to Karl!!!!! Why not. He is there!!! Are you? I'm more sick of the politicizing going on from both sides of the isle than the recommendations of a General who was respected by both sides until the other side decided they didn't like what he was saying. For the Democrats, the war can never go good because it will hurt their chances of capturing the White House. They have done everything in their power to hinder the war at every turn. You have seen what happens to Democrats that support the war. By the way, if that is happening, talk to the democrats who have power in the House and Senate with about a 23% aapproval rating. Maybe the liberals shouldn't be up moveon. relevé d identité opérateur rg's a$$ so much..

 

HEATH SLAWSON

11:52 PM ET

August 18, 2011

Europe to Washington: Hurry it up already

"I think it would be a calamitous outcome, create a very severe financial shock," Mr. Bernanke said. "A default on those [Treasury] securities would throw the financial system ... potentially into chaos. " The warnings are a preliminary signal that, despite an aura of calm in stock and bond prices, the financial response to continued gridlock on the debt issue could be severe. Precisely because of those severe consequences, both politicians and bankers are saying they expect that some bipartisan deal will be reached before an Aug. 2 deadline. The federal government has run up against its current $14.3 trillion borrowing limit, set by Congress. If that cap isn't raised by early August, the Treasury warns it will not be able to pay all the nation's bills. Even tori black a short period of late payments on federal debt, Moody's warned, could have long-lasting repercussions for America's reputation in credit markets. "

 

AXELBROOK

6:50 AM ET

August 19, 2011

I think you have it

I think you have it completely backwards. Who was the last president who took a non-interventionist approach to foreign policy. We've been in military conflicts all over the world almost nonstop since World War 2. RIO What else do you want?.

 

Passport, FP’s flagship blog, brings you news and hidden angles on the biggest stories of the day, as well as insights and under-the-radar gems from around the world.

Read More