Wednesday, July 20, 2011 - 5:24 PM
Could Muammar al-Qaddafi remain in Libya if he agrees to give up power? It may sound hard to imagine, but as the conflict drags on and the stalemate shows no sign of ending, the idea is gaining traction -- even among Qaddafi's staunch opponents. Today, France's Foreign Minister Alain Juppe suggested it was a possibility.
"One of the scenarios effectively envisaged is that he stays in Libya on one condition which I repeat - that he very clearly steps aside from Libyan political life," Juppe told France's LCI TV.
The solution would require some major legal maneuvering. The new Libyan government -- most likely made up of leaders of the Transitional National Council (TNC) -- would have to agree not to prosecute Qaddafi or his son for the deaths of thousands of people. Internationally, the move would certainly require some sort of Security Council agreement, since Qaddafi, after all, is wanted by the International Criminal Court (ICC) for war crimes (and since any agreement would likely require some international oversight).
The fact that France is suggesting this is significant. It was, after all, one of the first countries to recognize the TNC, and it pushed other nations into supporting the NATO air campaign against Qaddafi. Other governments have hinted at a similar solution in the past -- though mainly countries outside the coalition. Recently, Konstantin Kosachyov, the chairman of the international affairs committee in Russia's lower house of parliament, said: "Probably what can be discussed is some kind of guarantees of his personal security, the security of members of his family."
Last week, Turkey's Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu told journalists that "an exit strategy for Qaddafi to leave power, but not necessarily the country, should be sought."
Officially, Britain and the United States want Qaddafi to be handed over to the ICC, but even their positions have softened recently. British officials say they don't regard that demand as a "red line" in negotiations with Qaddafi. And today, in response to Juppe's statement, the United States made it clear the key was getting Qaddafi to leave power, after that, all things could be considered.
"He needs to remove himself from power," White House spokesman Jay Carney said. "And then it's up to the Libyan people to decide."
Earlier this month, the head of the TNC even hinted that a solution that keeps Qaddafi in Libya was possible. Mustapha Abdul-Jalil told Reuters that the TNC had offered Qaddafi that very deal -- allowing him to stay in Libya if he resigned. (Abdul-Jalil quickly back-pedaled, however, saying the next day that while the TNC discussed that scenario internally, there was no "current or future possibility for Qaddafi to remain in Libya.")
So could a solution like this actually work? Qaddafi would need to be assured he would remain free and safe. Some reports have said he is pushing for a role for his son, Saif al-Islam, in a future government -- though it's highly unlikely the rebels would agree to that.
Another reported possibility is that the U.N. would protect him at his tribal home of Sabha in southwestern Libya. But that would require countries guaranteeing he wouldn't be handed over to the ICC at some point in the future. And that might be a step too far.
known his morale and character I would say he will not accept that offer without seizing any kind of influence in the country , he is very much aware of the hatred and the despises that every man and woman in Libya feels for him , and the worst nightmare for him is being captured and tried by Libyans , although the West wanted to see an end to the conflict sooner , hence they secretly wanted him killed , Qaddafi's memorials depot is full of secrets that would be more likely to incriminate the West for their past rules in instilling him in the country . As for us Libyans we will never relinquish the momentum and the opportunity granted to us by destiny to rid the country from this epidemic that plagued the nation for over four decades , even if the Nato decided to cease their military back up operations
took too long to get to this point...
and the three stooges have made too many missteps and shed a great deal of credibility along the way.
Consider, had we stuck to the no fly zone authorized by the Security Council and maintained a safe haven, we probably might have reached this point long ago. As it is, we've seen the west indulge in an imperial-looking overreach which has cost way too much in any dimension you care to mention. Not just in Libya, but elsewhere as well.
Perhaps worst of all, we've seen R2P used as a pretext. (It doesn't matter what you or I think. It matters what people in China, Russia, Pakistan, the Congo, Sudan, Syria, Venezuela . . . think. I'm one of those liberal interventionists that Walt likes to trash, but dammit, it needs to be done RIGHT.)
Who thinks Qaddafi could stay in Libya?
As British aircraft step up the bombing against Gaddafi's security and intelligence apparatus before the arrival of Ramadan on 1 August, Hague said the focus should be on ensuring that the Libyan leader leaves power. Speaking at a press conference in London Monday with his French counterpart Alain faye reagan Juppé, who has been more relaxed about Gaddafi's personal future, Hague said it was up to the Libyan people to decide his future. British sources said that Hague was not denoting a shift in British thinking because ministers have maintained from the start of the military action in March that the future of Libya will be decided by its own people. But on 28 February, a few weeks before the launch of the air campaign, David Cameron told MPs that Gaddafi must go. "We should be clear that for the future of Libya and its people, Colonel Gaddafi's regime must end and he must leave," he said at the time. Libyan rebel leader Mustafa Abdel Jalil has said Gaddafi and his family could stay in the country if they gave up power. His concession, in an interview with the Wall Street Journal, reflects those by Nato governments, including Britain and France, which are now suggesting Gaddafi might not be arraigned before the international criminal court (ICC) in The Hague for war crimes.
It's time for the rest of the world to step up and take part in world affairs. RIO Who elected the United States Sheriff? I'm tired of the US bankrupting itself to help countries overseas..
Could Muammar al-Qaddafi remain in Libya if he agrees to give up power?
To be honest who really cares!
He should have been taken out a log time ago whereby saving many lives.
No only the U.S. but how about the U.K.
Passport, FP’s flagship blog, brings you news and hidden angles on the biggest stories of the day, as well as insights and under-the-radar gems from around the world.
Read More
(7)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE