In a bit of unfortunate timing, the C.I.A.'s website was shut down for a couple of hours yesterday evening in an apparent cyber attack. It was only a week ago that Leon Panetta, the C.I.A.'s outgoing director, warned senators that cyber warfare could be the next big battleground for the United States.

"The next Pearl Harbor we confront could very well be a cyber attack that cripples our power systems, our grid, our security systems, our financial systems, our governmental systems," he told the Senate Armed Services Committee during his confirmation hearing to replace Bob Gates as secretary of defense.

Yesterday's attack on the C.I.A. was in the form of a denial of service, meaning the hackers flooded the site with requests for access, effectively shutting down the server. While it certainly doesn't rise to the level of causing crippling damage, it is an embarrassment for the agency and highlights just how vulnerable our cyber infrastructure is.

The hacker group claiming responsibility for the attack calls itself LulzSec and describes itself as "the world's leaders in high-quality entertainment at your expense." They claimed credit via twitter yesterday with the message: "Tango down - cia.gov-for the lulz."

The group has also claimed responsibility for a string of other high profile attacks in recent weeks on the U.S. Senate, Sony, and PBS.

A U.S. official said it was important to keep in mind the site wasn't technically "hacked" since the attackers weren't able to get into the system, but acknowledged the two-hour episode was "annoying."

"These kind of issues can affect any website," the official said. "In this case it was resolved quickly."

 

JBROCKLE

1:43 PM ET

June 16, 2011

Hmm

I'm not sure it shows much except that no publicly facing website can be secured against DDoS attacks, unless you want to waste a fortune on vast quantities of extra bandwidth that will be useless 99.99% of the time.

 

STEVEM

4:02 PM ET

June 16, 2011

Too Much Is Never Enough

Only the fear-monger Crony Capitalist government contractors like Richard Clarke's Good Harbor Services:

http://www.goodharbor.net/services/cyber_security.php

will bang the over-inflated threat drum as "security experts" in the media.

Because fear-mongering is what brings is in the business for those parasites. Even if it's miniscule or mitigation is infeasible without tossing every dollar in the country at it.

The Military-Security Complex - Ike would be appalled at the metastasis.

 

WEMEANTWELL

3:33 PM ET

June 16, 2011

Stupid Article

1) A denial of service attack can be launched with software found in the darker corners of the web though I am sure Lulz was much more cleever, and stopped by a system administrator paying attention. It is embarassing and not much more. It is not Pearl Harbor.

2) The CIA public web site runs off an unclass server somewhere. It has no connection to anything inside the CIA.

3) This in no way whatsoever "highlights just how vulnerable our cyber infrastructure is." It is more akin to your cable TV going out during a thunderstorm.

Can a website as smart as FP please avoid such scare mongering articles? Leave those for Time and Newsweek to frighten old retired people.

 

Passport, FP’s flagship blog, brings you news and hidden angles on the biggest stories of the day, as well as insights and under-the-radar gems from around the world.

Read More