Posted By Blake Hounshell Share

On Sunday, for the first time since January 25, the Arab world's attention was riveted not on scenes of protesters castigating their own governments, but on much more familiar imagery: that of Palestinians resisting Israeli occupation.

For months, Palestinian and Arab activists had planned to mark May 15 -- Youm an-Nakba or "Day of the Catastrophe," which usually takes place the day after Israel's independence celebrations -- with a civilian march on the occupied territories. For Arabs, Nakba Day represents a day of mourning, a time to commemorate the expulsion during the 1948 war of Palestinians from their villages and homes, press for the right of refugees to return, and denounce the Jewish state.

In past years, Nakba Day has generally passed without much fanfare: demonstrations around the world and in Palestinian villages, occasional attempts to march on Israeli-held territory, met with force.

But this is 2011, and things were rather different on Sunday. In Lebanon, a group of hundreds of Palestinian refugees tried to stream across the border and were fired upon by both Israeli and Lebanese troops. Near the Erez crossing in Gaza, IDF soldiers fired on Palestinians seeking to cross into Israel. Near Ramallah in the West Bank, a large crowd battled tear-gas-wielding riot troops with rocks and Molotov cocktails. And in Syria, another large crowd swarmed over the fence along the disputed line that separates the two countries and made it into Majdal Shams, a Druze village in the Golan Heights, before being rounded up by the IDF. (Jordan and Egypt prevented smaller crowds from reaching the border.) Altogether, more than a dozen Palestinians were killed and dozens more wounded by live fire, according to the New York Times.

Al Jazeera Arabic went large with its coverage, deploying a split screen to show the events live, while thousands more followed developments on Twitter using the #nakba tag. So did Syrian state television, happy to change the subject from the domestic demonstrations of the last few months. Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah hailed the protesters, addressing them directly: "You are adamant to liberate your land no matter how many sacrifices you make and the fate of this [Jewish] entity is to fade." Hamas declared the onset of a third intifada; its leader in Gaza, Ismail Haniya, declared that changes sweeping the region would "lead to the collapse of the Zionist project in Palestine and victory for the program of the nation." Meanwhile, in Cairo, Egyptian security forces violently dispersed a large crowd demonstrating in front of the Israeli Embassy, arresting a number of well-known revolutionary Twitterati.

Somewhere in Damascus, Bashar al-Assad is smiling for the first time in weeks.

All of this sounds a bit like the old Middle East, doesn't it? Arabs raging impotently at the Jews instead of their own brutal rulers? And yet the narrative that the Arab revolutions were never about Israel has always been wrong, or at least incomplete. For Arabs living under authoritarian regimes, Israel (and America's support for Israel) has long been seen as an important reason for their subjugation. Nowhere is this more true than in Egypt, where Hosni Mubarak bucked popular opinion by selling gas to Israel below market rates and enforced a widely reviled blockade of Gaza. In Tahrir Square, there were plenty of chants denouncing Mubarak as an Israeli and American agent, no matter what Thomas Friedman says.

Yet there is nothing impotent about Sunday's tactics, which put Israel and its American ally in an incredibly tough position. Whatever Assad's cynical motives for allowing and even encouraging the protesters to reach the Golan ("See, Bibi, you need me after all!"), Palestinians now have a powerful tool at their disposal, and there will no doubt be attempts to replicate the feat. As Haaretz columnist Aluf Benn puts it, "The nightmare scenario Israel has feared since its inception became real -- that Palestinian refugees would simply start walking from their camps toward the border and would try to exercise their ‘right of return.'"

Even more awkward for the United States, Netanyahu is due to visit Washington in a few days in what will likely be one long exposition of the words, "I told you so." If he is smart, he will announce a serious plan for peace and get out ahead of the most serious threat to Israel's security since the 1973 war. If he is true to form, he will use the opportunity to double down on his argument for the status quo.

President Obama has planned two speeches for the coming week: one for Thursday, billed as a disquisition on the Arab Spring, and another an address at the AIPAC conference. With George Mitchell's resignation, the peace process is officially dead. The Arab street now understands its power -- people clearly aren't going to sit around quietly waiting until September for the U.N. General Assembly to pass a resolution recognizing a Palestinian state. The BDS movement ("boycott, divestment, sanctions") is gaining steam internationally. There will be more marches, more flotillas, more escalation, more senseless deaths.

What is Obama going to say now?

Jalaa Marey/JINI/Getty Images

 

TRUTH NOT PARTISAN

6:27 AM ET

May 16, 2011

Fallacies

"that of Palestinians resisting Israeli occupation. "
They are not resisting occupation, but rather Israel's right to resist. Unless you are willing to admit that you believe Israel occupies Haifa, Tel Aviva, Jaffa, Eilat, etc. If not then please admit to the fact that remembering the Nakba has turned into an event where Palestinians would like to see Israel gone as a state in its entirety.

also its interesting that you say that Thomas Friedman was wrong when he was in fact there.... hard to dispute someone when they were actually there.

I wonder why Assad let his citizens go crazy at the border? It deflected criticism from him!
If any other citizens of any other hostile country tried invading their land in mass they would be met with gunfire as well.

Or Israel can say its an I told you so, and have Obama understand why security is such a big factor in Israeli politics, when the whole region around you is "mourning" the fact that your state exists, it can be a little unnerving to say the least.

 

BLAKE HOUNSHELL

6:36 AM ET

May 16, 2011

I was there too

And he obviously wasn't paying attention.

 

FRISBEETARIAN

3:05 AM ET

May 17, 2011

The Palestinians have a right

The Palestinians have a right to return to their lands as much as the Jews have a right to a homeland, which you named Israel.

 

LAKDSLKAJDSFIE

3:28 PM ET

May 17, 2011

The Palestinian protesters are not citizens of Syria

"We came to this country which was already populated by Arabs, and we are establishing a Hebrew, that is a Jewish, state here...Jewish villages were built in the place of Arab villages...There is not a single community in the country that did not have a former Arab population."

--Israeli leader, Moshe Dayan, quoted in Benjamin Beit-Hallahmi's "Original Sins."

"Why should the Arabs make peace? If I was an Arab leader, I would never make terms with Israel. That is natural: we have taken their country. Sure, God promised it to us, but what does that matter to them? Our God is not theirs, We come from Israel, it's true, but two thousand years ago, and what is that to them? There has been anti-Semitism, the Nazis, Hitler, Auschwitz, but was that their fault? They only see one thing: we came here and stole their country. Why should they accept that?"

--David Ben-Gurion, quoted in "The Jewish Paradox" by Nathan Goldman, former president of the World Jewish Congress.

 

JOSEPH ZRNCHIK

6:28 AM ET

May 16, 2011

Slaughter of Protesters

Why are there no warrrants issued for Crimes Agaisnt Humanity for Israel slaughtering unarmed protesters?

America needs to quit providing attack helicopters and white phosperous to slaugher and ethnically cleanse Palestinian land.

If Ron Paul were president our entanglement in the conflict would end immediately.

The Israelis want America to kill Muslims down to the last American soldier.

Day of Rage in D.C.

http://beforeitsnews.com/story/462/358/Americans_Redress_of_Grievances_or_Day_of_Rage_in_Washington_D.C._on_June_30,_2011.html

 

JACOB BLUES

10:17 AM ET

May 16, 2011

Simply put Joseph they weren't protestors

Protestors don't invade another country. Especially when the two parties remain in a state of war.

Nationals of an enemy state breaching a border is considered an invasion, not a protest.

 

FRISBEETARIAN

3:09 AM ET

May 17, 2011

When did Palestinians ever

When did Palestinians ever become nationals or are you very visibly willing to blur the facts. Palestinians are trying to exercise their right, and that is a right to a homeland. Just as the Jews claim to have that right embodied in Israel, so too the Palestinians. If peace was ever to be possible, you would need to let go of this double standard when it comes to rights, to the hypocrisy and admit that the Palestinians have a true claim when they go barging through the borders.

 

LAKDSLKAJDSFIE

3:30 PM ET

May 17, 2011

The Golan Heights where this protest happened is Syrian

The United Nations has passed multiple resolutions calling for Israel to end its occupation of the Golan Heights

No country in the world recognizes it as legitimately being Israeli territory, and that fence is not an "international border". International borders are agreed upon by both states.

The entire protest was within the borders of Syria, so to claim that Israel was "invaded" is false. The Israeli troops themselves were in Syrian territory and so were the protesters

 

JOSEPH ZRNCHIK

6:29 AM ET

May 16, 2011

Google: "Day of Rage in D.C."

Fix America!

Google: "Day of Rage in D.C."

 

JACOB BLUES

10:12 AM ET

May 16, 2011

Bread and circuses at the border

Blake, I'm surprised that you think this was anything other than a planned sacrifice by Bashar Assad. This was taken from today's NY Times regarding the Golan border and the Palestinians living in Syria:

"The frontier along the Golan Heights, a strategic rocky plateau, is the most sensitive in Syria, and checkpoints proliferate. Even for Syrians, permission is required to enter some parts of it. In an authoritarian state, the government also keeps relentless surveillance over the 10 official Palestinian camps and three unofficial ones.

Mr. Ziadeh, citing informants in Damascus, said at least four buses were seen Saturday leaving two camps where factions most loyal to Syria exert control."

The implications here are clear. Putting it bluntly, one does not walk to the Golan Heights from Syria. No way, no how-- not a foreigner, not a Syrian citizen, and certainly not a group of Palestinians-- without express permission by the state.

Same thing goes for Hizballah's stronghold in southern Lebanon, where even UNIFIL troops on patrol for smuggled weapons, moves at the leisure of Hizballah. This, in a land where Palestinians are considered persona non-gratta, and are forbidden from either owning assets, or participating in over 70 types of work.

That you consider this 'people power', shows either a rose tinted view of the world that just doesn't exist in the visible spectrum, or you're rubbing your hand in glee that Iran's and its clients will push for more regional instibility to keep the heat off their own backsides.

 

JACOB BLUES

10:15 AM ET

May 16, 2011

As for 'people power' and the nakba, we saw a perfect example

of that as an Israeli Arab decided to drive a mac-truck through a crowded highway, killing one and sending 17 more to the emergency room, with one in critical condition.

 

FRISBEETARIAN

3:13 AM ET

May 17, 2011

You are quite wrong when it

You are quite wrong when it comes to Lebanon. Hezbollah does not have the authority nor is it responsible for stopping the Palestinians access to the border. That is the job of the Lebanese army and state, and they did try to stop them but to no avail. The army even threatened to use violence but in the end the Palestinians did not stop.

 

BUDAHH

10:27 AM ET

May 16, 2011

few corrections

First the lebanese protestors who died were killed by Lebanese fire and not Israeli fire.

You say expulsion from their homes and a lot of historians will tell you that they ran away at least the majority of them, what about the expulsion of jews from arab countries.

What the heck does the arab spring have to do with israel, Tunisia, Libya, syria, come on this is a pathetic argument, the jews were misplaced after the holocaust and resettled their refugees in Israel, the arabs who were misplaced after the war of attempting to destroy Israel are oppressed by racist laws in Syria Lebanon, the are suffering in Iraq. The arab world has used the palestinins and their refugee status after the war to keep inciting against Israel. How can you explian the laws against palestinians in Lebanon and syria? even in jordan they are the majority and they only get 11 out of 105 seats .

What is this thing about the palestinians that makes them so special compare to other refugees, there were tens of millions of ferugees after world war two and all of them don't get the special treatment that palestinians get. Why do they need UNWRA because the arab countries refuse to give them citizenship. The arab citizens of old mandate palestine were from the same ethnic people that live in syria and jordan and Iraq and Egypt, the have the same family names and families who live there, but because the lived in the mandate they are supposed to have a special right of return and un agency.
Never heard of such a case in the world.

The egyptians are mad because their life is shit and their country cannot provide for them, so because of the gas deal they hate Israel, what a pathetic argument, that is why thier life is the way it is because of Israel, would anything change if Israel would disappear tomorrow, their would prosper all of a sudden? Egypt needed the money from the gas for their citizens and Jordan gets the gas for cheaper so don't sell us that reason, the gas deal stuff only cameout after Mubarak is gone just as a reason to vilify him.

The arab worlds problems are rooted in its culture and ruling regimes buy hey blame israel for all of their problems again its a good way to take peoples minds off the real isssues.

 

FRISBEETARIAN

3:23 AM ET

May 17, 2011

Many historians will also

Many historians will also tell you that most of the Palestinians ran away after gaining knowledge on the massacres being perpetrated by the Zionists in many Palestinian villages. The whole claim that the Arab armies told the Palestinian population to leave their lands so they could minimize causalities is one of the stupidest and ill gotten claims i have ever wrapped my head around. No evidence, not one broadcast, reveals that this was the case. The population was either deported or was forced out by militant Zionists. Finkelstein's Image and Reality of the Israel Palestine Conflict explains the matter and puts it together very succinctly.

What about the expulsion of Jews from Arab countries? What a primitive argument. Oh so because a wrong was done to the Jews, the Jews then have to do a wrong to someone else. Please. If compensation is what you seek then you're espousing a valid demand, but going about taking other people's lands and forbidding them access to it is not how one goes about doing it. Remember that prior to the establishment of the Israeli state Jews owned 9% of what is today Israel and Palestine.

 

BUDAHH

11:05 AM ET

May 17, 2011

I am only pointing out the ridiculous special treatment for

Palestinian refugees in the world, the reason they are still refugees is because of the arab countries. They are never coming back to Israel and we all know that so why keep them in refugee camps in the bottom of society not allowing them to develop and move on instead feeding them lies and false dreams about coming back to Israel and the "Nakba".

I am saying look at the jews, thay came out of the holocaust and took their people in developed their country and society, and are now doing we'll so did most of the people after ww2, the arabs are the only ones who didn't and not because they believe they are really coming back to Israel, they never will, it is just a reason to keep the conflict going.

Finkelstein is not an objective scholar so he doesn't really count. The arabs refused to accept the partition plan and went into a war with the intension of destroying Israel and killing the jews, please stop your whining get over it' when you start a war and want to destroy the jewish population you don't get the land back, show me one case like that in history.

 

GUYVER

11:08 AM ET

May 16, 2011

Great points Blake

Many had mistakenly interpreted the Arab Spring to mean Arabs have abandoned the Palestinian cause. The Palestinian cause will remian the region's biggest issue and grievance until solved.

 

TRUTH NOT PARTISAN

12:10 PM ET

May 16, 2011

why?

It only stays that way because the Arab/Muslim govts. will keep it that way. It distracts from how their citizens are treated, like Assad, Mubarak, Ahmedinijad and now Erdogan.

The Palestinians don't have to live in refugee camps but oppressive laws in Lebanon, Syria and Jordan keep it that way. Let them assimilate! Don't lawfully keep them from jobs, homes, and restrict their movement while they live in your country.

 

UBOAT53

11:24 AM ET

May 16, 2011

Curiosity

Some questions I'd like to see you answer if you get a chance:

- Assuming Netanyahu were to go against form and propose a peace plan, what would it look like?

- Also, what are the minimum requirements for a peace plan to be "viable"?

- Could he propose such a plan given his political coalition?

- Could he find backing from Kadima if he proposed a serious plan and alienated his right wing?

- And finally, could he survive as head of the Likud party if he proposed a "viable" peace plan?

 

JACOB BLUES

12:10 PM ET

May 16, 2011

What peace u-boat?

Really, let's think about this for a moment.

The constant drumbeat has been for Israel to give land to the Palestinians so that they can set up their own state.

This follows the old UN242, which led to the Camp David accords signed by Israel and Egypt.

Israel handed over the land, and now, not even 35 years later, Egyptians want to tear up the agreement and the majority of Egyptians consider Israel an enemy state, with one of the leading new political groups, the Muslim Brotherhood, a shade away from calling for another war.

Israel left Lebanon in 1999, got the UN to affirm Israel lived up to the resolution #425, pulling back behind its own border, unilaterally.

Since then, it has remained in a state of war with Lebanon, and its ruling resistance group, Hizballah.

Israel left Gaza in 2005. Pulled every last Jew out, living and dead. Since then, it has faced daily rocket attacks, and has gone to war with the ruling HAMAS party, not once, but twice.

In 2008, Israeli PM Olmert, sat down with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, to round out the last peace agreements set forth in 2000 (Camp David II, and Taba). He begged Abbas to sign and end the conflict. Abbas rejected it, and even more importantly, did not offer a plan of his own.

Now, with Egypt, Libya, Tunisia, and Syria, all in the middle of political revolutions. With Hizballah about to be indicted for the murder of Lebanese Prime Minister Hariri, who is Israel supposed to make peace with? Abu Mazen? Who just brought HAMAS back into the Palestinian government? Who stated that Palestinians should march on Israel? Who rejects the idea of an independent Jewish state? Who's own Authority has on the books a law calling for capital punishment for the crime of selling land to a Jew? Or who has said that any Palestinian state would be Jew Free?

What does 'viable' look like?

 

FRISBEETARIAN

3:45 AM ET

May 17, 2011

Handed over land? Israel is

Handed over land? Israel is still illegally occupying the West Bank and East Jerusalem. It needs to stop building settlements in occupied lands, hand it over to the Palestinian authorities and then maybe peace will be a lot more reachable. Can't really see which claim you're making as regards to the land issue when we both now that it illegally controls a swath of land belonging to the Palestinians.

Correction: Israel left Lebanon in 2000, not 1999. And those are how many years it spent in violation of resolution #425? Yeah, 22 years. And then it only left because of the continuous onslaught the Lebanese Resistance(Hezbollah) was putting up against it. It is easy being two faced, isn't it?

Since then? Israel has violated Lebanon's airspace over 4000 times. Has abducted, shot and killed a number of farmers on the southern borders. Has violated Lebanon's waters numerous times, shot at its fishers and abducted them.

Israel left Gaza in 2005. Pulled every last Jew out, living and dead. Since then, it has faced daily rocket attacks, and has gone to war with the ruling HAMAS party, not once, but twice.

Israel left Gaza in 2005, and since then has initiated raids into Gazan territory and has launched air raids on Hamas members. Check the records, every time Hamas fired rockets at Israel it was due to retaliation from an air strike or bombardment. But of course, none of this gets transmitted through your precious mass media.

In 2008, PM Olmert tried to rob the Palestinian people of their lands with the promise of peace. But of course, even douche bag Abu Mazen didn't have the gale to abandon his ancestors lands in promise for a subdued and meaningless existence.

Viable looks as such: return the territories that you currently illegally occupy. Show some intent that you really want a cohesive and meaningful peace with your neighbors, and then your neighbors maybe won't so wary as to your intent. Maybe they'll start considering that its not all bad having you around, since you're not aggressive, you're not bent on subjugating them and taking away their lands and enslaving their people in prison like ghettos. Maybe if you showed the will, things will change. Until then, things will go downhill for Israel.

 

O. MANSOUR

12:32 PM ET

May 16, 2011

Obama must...

help Palestinians getting an international recognition of the Palestinian state. If Obama wants to "really" open a new page with the Muslim world, then the Palestinians should be allowed to live just like Israelis. They must be supported to have their basic rights of movement, trade, etc. I can't even send my family my thesis by mail because I know it will never be delivered to them because of Israeli restrictions.

The US must take an objective role or step aside and let the EU do the job!

 

COMETLINEAR

4:26 PM ET

May 16, 2011

The Palestinians can have that, and more

If they would just stop trying to kill Israelis.

Israel has said that quiet will be met with quiet.

 

BHARAT

1:27 PM ET

May 16, 2011

These Palestinians should

These Palestinians should also tell, how should Israelis commemorate the exodus of Jews from their promised land exclusively due to unjustified attacks on them by Muslims and Christians. What if they remember those days, and their barrels start speaking.

 

LAKDSLKAJDSFIE

3:37 PM ET

May 17, 2011

You need to check your sources

Jews don't mourn an exodus inspired by Muslims or Christians.. there was no such event. The exodus was because of Romans who were not Christian but Polytheists

 

BHARAT

1:34 PM ET

May 16, 2011

The Arabs must explain as to

The Arabs must explain as to how they arrived in Israel. If their occupation of Israel after driving Jews out is justified, then why not the other way round. You cannot blow hot and cold in the same breath.

 

RASHELMONI21

5:18 AM ET

May 17, 2011

Terrible

Its realy terrible

 

LAKDSLKAJDSFIE

3:35 PM ET

May 17, 2011

Straight from the Horse's Mouth

"Before their [the Palestinians] very eyes we are possessing the land and the villages where they, and their ancestors, have lived...We are the generation of colonizers, and without the steel helmet and the gun barrel we cannot plant a tree and build a home."
--Israeli leader Moshe Dayan, quoted in Benjamin Beit-Hallahmi, "Original Sins: Reflections on the History of Zionism and Israel"

 

LAKDSLKAJDSFIE

3:43 PM ET

May 17, 2011

An international border is one reached by agreement...

The proesters penetrated an area held by the State of Israel, but they did not cross the Israeli border.

The incident raises the question of whether Israel has a border with Syria on the Golan Heights. The answer seems obvious, but in fact it is not. An international border is one reached by agreement between the two political entities on either side.

Israel is an atypical state in that it does not have agreed international borders with all of its neighbors. That is especially true in the case of Lebanon and Syria. Israel and Lebanon are currently separated by the so-called Line of Withdrawal of Israeli Forces from Lebanon, agreed in 2000 between Israel and the United Nations and also known as the Blue Line. It corresponds in part with the international border demarcated by the English and French governments in 1923. In practice, there is currently no border between Israel and Lebanon.

In 1974, after the Yom Kippur War, the United Nations brokered the Separation of Forces Agreement between Israel in Syria. It specified the creation of two lines delineating the areas of military control of each side. Several years after the demarcation of this line, known as the Purple Line, the Israeli cabinet approved a resolution unilaterally annexing the area held by the Israel Defense Forces to Israel and making the line on the Golan Heights Israel's border.

It was this line that Syrian citizens crossed this week. By any international criterion, this is not the border between Israel and Syria. There is still a need for an official agreement between the two countries to create an international border, just as the borders between Israel and Egypt and between Israel and Jordan were created as part of the peace agreements between the countries.

 

MATT PETELICKY

5:46 PM ET

June 12, 2011

What the heck does the arab

What the heck does the arab spring have to do with israel, Tunisia, Libya, syria, come on this is a pathetic argument, the jews were misplaced after the holocaust and resettled their refugees in Israel, the arabs who were misplaced after the war stavkove kancelarie of attempting to destroy Israel are oppressed by racist laws in Syria Lebanon, the are suffering in Iraq. The arab world has used the palestinins and their refugee status after the war to keep inciting against Israel. How can you explian the laws against palestinians in Lebanon and syria? even in jordan they are the majority and they only get 11 out of 105 seats .What is this thing about the palestinians that makes them so special compare to other refugees, there were tens of millions of ferugees after world war two and all of them don't get the special treatment that palestinians get. Why do they need UNWRA because the arab countries refuse to give them citizenship.

 

Passport, FP’s flagship blog, brings you news and hidden angles on the biggest stories of the day, as well as insights and under-the-radar gems from around the world.

Read More