Tuesday, March 29, 2011 - 1:25 PM

If you thought it was cynical to suggest that Nicolas Sarkozy may have been aggresively pushing for military action with an eye on the 2012 election, that's nothing compared to the notion that the campaign is serving as an advertisement for the Dassault Rafale fighter jet. EUObserver reports:
But looking in detail at French operations in Libya, military analysts have also said that France is using the war to promote its badly-selling €60-million-per-unit Rafale fighter.
Rafale jets fired the symbolic first shot against Gaddafi at 17.45 Libyan time on 19 March, destroying four tanks on the outskirts of Benghazi. The strike took place three hours before the US and UK began bombarding Gaddafi anti-aircraft bases, with the French ministry of defence swiftly posting a set of Rafale pictures on its website.
David Cenciotti, an Italian jet-fighter-pilot-turned-analyst, told EUobserver that the Rafale strikes were highly irregular because in a normal operation the anti-air-defence bombardment would have come first.
"The French intervention is, among other things, aimed at putting the Rafale under the spotlight," he said. "For sure, the French air force was confident that Benghazi was free of SAM [surface-to-air-missile] sites, but I think it was mainly a demo."
Sweden may also be getting in on the act:
For his part, Paul Holtum, an expert at the Swedish arms-control NGO Sipri, added: "I understand that the 'marketing possibilities' have also been discussed with regard to a Swedish decision on whether to send the Gripen for action over Libya ... However, the air campaign might be of more interest with regard to markets for advanced missiles and guided bombs rather than combat aircraft."
A spokesman for Dassault, the French company dismisses the theory as "propaganda, not reality," but is also eager to point out why the jet's features make it ideally suited to the mission as it "can do air combat, bombardment, observation. All this in one flight."
Dassault is currently in talks to sell 60 of the jets to the United Arab Emirates -- a coalition partner -- and ironically had been in talks to sell 14 to Qaddafi himself until February.
Also worth noting is that the U.S.'s much-vaunted F-22 Raptor has been conspicuous by its absence in the skies Libya because of its "inability to communicate with other coalition aircraft and its limited ability to hit ground targets." With more than $65 billion spent, the F-22 has also not performed a single mission in Iraq or Afghanistan.
EMMANUEL DUNAND/AFP/Getty Images
Worth noting? Thank you very much, but no thanks.
The F-22 is designed as air superiority Air to Air fighter to serve in a high intensity access denial combat situation. What does Libya have? PAKFA? J-20? Have you seen Libya flew a jet after the UN1973 resolution went through?
Give me a break. Plus the we're only getting 187 airframes, (approx 120 combact coded), whats the point of wasting their airframe life and high operating cost in doing what cheaper/more capable A/G 4th generation fighters can exceed in?
You calling the F-22 too expensive? Least it's d**n capable. Call the B-2 too expensive too? Then tell me about the delayed, delayed, and delayed F-35. That thing gonna be too heavy, too incapable, and too expensive to do what all the cheap 4th gen jets (for example: F-15E) can do better.
F-22's are for the first few hours of an air combat against other high performance jets to gain air superiority, set stage for other aircraft to access the battlespace.
True that the F-22 is not capable of communication with other aircrafts except for it's wingman, but thats the sacrifice to gain stealth. Plus we had the plans to upgrade it with the Multifunction Advanced Data-link (MADL), but the airfare killed it for saving budget.
The F-22 program was completely without problems right? Hang on, I seem to remember it had issues with cost, weight and capabilities as well!
The criticisms people level at the F22 for not partaking in CAS roles in current wars are ridiculous and in this you're completely correct. However, you're forgetting the growing pains of a fighter you seem to admire to lambaste one you clearly don't.
The F-22 is surely too expensive.
youtube to mp4 converter
Passport, FP’s flagship blog, brings you news and hidden angles on the biggest stories of the day, as well as insights and under-the-radar gems from around the world.
Read More
(3)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE