1)And what does that make all the non-Jewish citizens of Israel? And the state of which Jews: ethnic?, religious? converted? by whom? political? ....
2)All of the Palestinian state actors , including Hamas, have already agreed to that as have all of the Arab states if Israel will end its illegal occupation.
3)And what does that leave them to negotiate with?
And If Palestine complies with your silly preconditions, and bends over and spreads its cheeks, what next?

Too bad Saddam Hussein couldn't have held onto Kuwait in 1991.
By now he'd have re-drawn the borders so as to re-include it as Iraq's 19th province.
Iraq could have built 'settlements' and a Apartheid Wall aka Separation Fence - LOL in Kuwaiti territory and around all the best water supplies, etc.

Then maybe the world could decide what international laws are fair for ALL nations to abide by.

As it stands, zionists like Pellam call ridiculous shots and demand that the whole world obey or be called "Anti-Semetic" - the worn out shield of a worn out aggressor.

Jewish state in mandate Palestine -- is anachronistic in the 21st century. The idea that non-Jews who have lived on the land for generations before the creation of the state of Israel should be relegated to second-class citizenship because they're not Jewish is racist plain and simple.

It is not the responsibility of the the Palestinians or any other Arab state or entity to recognize Israel as a Jewish state. They have recognized Israel's right to exist and that is sufficient.

The demands to be recognized as a Jewish state only began when netty came to power.
It's a red herring 'pre-condition' that is a nonstarter and netty knows it. While netty whines about Palestinians pre-conditions he's got enough up his sleeve to derail his version of 'peace' or did you not see his Oslo video?

You are also failing to remember that not a single Israeli prime minister has ever recognized Palestine's right to exist even while demanding that Palestinians recognize Israel's right to exist as a Jewish state.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oslo_Accords#Remarks_from_Benjamin_Netanyahu

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hkN1KMLZH4o&feature=player_embedded

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/07/18/tricky-bibi/

Before that, Israel demanded to be recognized (while refusing to declare it's borders) and Arafat had already agreed to recognize Israel on paper.

Also, Israel’s refusal to give the 800,000 dispossessed Palestinians the right of return is a huge thorn in its side when claiming to be a democracy.

Under international law, dispossessed people are entitled to return to their land, so if Israel was a functioning democratic nation that followed international law, the majority of it’s citizens would be Arab, and they would have the right to vote. Don't like it? Tough. That's what we call democracy.

Israel has demanded that any 2 state solution denies the Palestinians the right of self determination while the Palestinians have to recognize Israel and jewish only? Rubbish.

And FYI, it was the PLO that first endorsed the 2 state solution, to which Israel responded by invading Lebanon and trying to destroy them,.

Israel is the only State admitted to UN membership on condition that it would be obedient to the world body and be bound, more specifically, by two General Assembly resolutions – of November 1947 for partition of Palestine and of December 1948 enshrining the right of the Palestinian refugees to return to their homes or be satisfied with compensation.

A document on UN record, dated 29 November 1948, reads: "On behalf of the State of Israel, I, Moshe Shertok, Minister for Foreign Affairs, being duly authorised by the State Council of Israel, declare that the State of Israel hereby unreservedly accepts the obligation of the UN Charter and undertakes to honour them from the day when it becomes a Member of the United Nations."

And why should the ROR of refugees (and or compensations) not be included in any peace deal? It's a fundamental issue that Zionists like you either trivialize as non existent, or want to go away, because you can't imagine ever having to address it.

The Israelis don't "give" the Palestinians land - they return land stolen from the Palestinians - or Egypt, or Syria, or Lebanon. Why should the Palestinians have to give anything in return?

Would you give something to a thief in return for him giving you back your stolen property?

As for living in 'peace' with israel. Palestinians have a right to defend themselves against constant terror from Israeli occupiers. It is Israel that violates the sovereignty of all neighboring countries and kills civilians on a daily basis. What makes you think they have no right to self defense and to live in peace from daily harrassment by the ragtag criminals of the IDF, night raids, detentions, and the illegal settler terrorist squats beating, burning, and stealing Palestinian land.

As for your little king Jr. of jordan comment, it is a lie,nothing shows your raciscm any better. King Abdullah has said no such thing.

This is what he said:
There are Israeli politicians who say that publicly Jordan supports a full-fledged Palestinian state, but off-the-record that it is not very excited about having a Palestinian state right there in the Jordan valley and would rather have Israel on the other side of its border. What would you say to them?

"I do not know anybody, any Jordanian, who would say that there is a shred of common sense to that. The true future of our little area is going to be Israeli, Palestinian and Jordanian, and it has to be separate entities. There are also Israelis who want to push the problem to Jordan. An independent Palestinian state allows us a different future of how we move economically, socially and even politically."

http://www.haaretz.com/news/king-abdullah-to-haaretz-jordan-aims-to-develop-nuclear-power-1.210546

Go back to your cubicle at the hasbara institute in your capital Tel Aviv and change your sticky notes.

You are desperate, you know?

You had some typos:

Keep washing your hands zionist pellam.

Typical, classic pro-Israel post. It contains all the hallmarks: it‘s loaded with gratuitous personal insults, makes unsupported assertions about the speaker, and completely ignores my actual argument.

Your rhetorical hasbara strategies fail and will continue to fail. We are not Rachel Corries that you can bulldoze over and kill with insults and personal attacks.

Resorting to character assassination, personal attacks, or unwarranted accusations is always the strategy of cheesy Israeli apologists.

One of the key reasons that the Israeli government and people, like you, have lost so much influence all around the world in recent years, and especially among well-educated sectors of Europe and the United States, is because they tend to rely heavily on “arguments” like the one you just made—personal attacks and smears.

Political movements which are standing on solid ground, and which have facts, reason and morality on their side, do not stoop to these methods. It’s a sign of desperation and general intellectual bankruptcy.

But then, you gotta work with what you have. Logically and morally, if one is an Israel supporter, like you, that‘s not much.

But then, you gotta work with what you have. Logically and morally, if one is an Israel supporter, like you, that‘s not much.