Posted By Blake Hounshell Share

Today's column is very strange. Apparently Broder thinks Obama can fix the economy by threatening a war with Iran:

With strong Republican support in Congress for challenging Iran's ambition to become a nuclear power, he can spend much of 2011 and 2012 orchestrating a showdown with the mullahs. This will help him politically because the opposition party will be urging him on. And as tensions rise and we accelerate preparations for war, the economy will improve.

I am not suggesting, of course, that the president incite a war to get reelected. But the nation will rally around Obama because Iran is the greatest threat to the world in the young century. If he can confront this threat and contain Iran's nuclear ambitions, he will have made the world safer and may be regarded as one of the most successful presidents in history.

In case it's not obvious, this is crazy for a number of reasons. One is that markets don't like tensions, and certainly not the kind that jack up oil prices. Second, World War II brought the United States out of the Great Depression because it was a massive economic stimulus program that mobilized entire sectors of society. Today's American military has all the tools it needs to fight Iran, and there isn't going to be any sort of buildup. Hasn't Broder been reading his own newspaper? The Pentagon is looking to find billions in cuts as it confronts the coming world of budget austerity.

I'll leave the question of whether Iran is truly "the greatest threat to the world" to others.

 

NORBOOSE

2:14 PM ET

October 31, 2010

Iran is so not

North Korea already has nukes and will inevitably collapse within 25 years. Russia and China have the potential to end human civilization if their leadership ever has a really bad day. Yeah, Iran is up there on the list, but putting it at number one is just stupid.

 

PADDYP

4:29 PM ET

October 31, 2010

Iran is so not

No mention of the greatest threat to the world and its citizens - the good old USA. And picking another country to lose against is just brilliant.

 

NORBOOSE

9:14 PM ET

October 31, 2010

Yeah, were there with Russia and China

Im not pretending otherwise. Im not really sure what youre getting all snarky about.

 

SLAMNT

3:42 PM ET

October 31, 2010

...Greatest Threat to America in Order!

Sarah Palin

Lack of In-House Intellectual Capacity to accept and deal with its debt burden

The Economist, Foreign Affairs and this magazine all agree: Pakistan

Lack of credible GOP leadership

Fox News

No credible alternative to the Milton Friedman "Shock & Awe" economic model which will soon be coming home to roost!

Last thing Obama ever wants to be known as is a War – rior President! Bob Woodward makes that very clear in his latest book.

 

KRISTINA1C

10:19 PM ET

October 31, 2010

Seriously, how can he come to that conclusion?

One just needs to look at what the costs of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have been to know that this would not be an investment in our future. The latest numbers from the Congressional Research Service are staggering.

http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RL33110.pdf

Besides, if war was such a good way out of an economic crisis we should be out already. I truely hope that the Republican party recognizes (and I think the vast majority of them do) that just deciding to run into another war will only hurt our cause and our economy more. I truely doubt that support would be there as he proposes.

 

SAM FROM CALIFORNIA

1:58 AM ET

November 1, 2010

If war really helps the economy...

... why not declare war on sand and bomb the desert?

The line of reasoning that war, not economic stimulus, helps the economy, is so inane i don't understand where it comes from. A bomb produces nothing aside from a crater; America's productivity was in no way improved by dropping a bomb, be it in the middle of Berlin or the middle of the desert. It was instead the act of the government procuring billions of dollars in aid while taxing the rich well over 50%.

What war-happy neocons are really arguing is that the only politically safe stimulus spending is war, and that peaceful stimulus spending is politically impossible.

 

JAYDEE001

12:07 PM ET

November 1, 2010

The answer to your question

The answer to your question is a big affirmative! Broder is obviously demented. Time for him to be bid farewell and a peaceful retirement by his employer.

1) We are destined to experience a humiliating failure as we leave Iraq (witness the violence in Bagdad last evening), a wholly unnecessary war which Broder, amongst others, cheered us into;
2) we are wasting more lives and treasure in Afghanistan where no outside power has ever been successful in history as far back as Alexander, and where there is no longer any clear mission;
3) we are on the threshold of expanding that war into Pakistan;
4) we are initiating military action under the radar in Yemen;
5) and the neocons would have us consider going back to Somolia.

A war with Iran would hardly end our current economic woes, and it might be the end of the US as a republic. It would lead to an economic catastrophe involving a quarter of the world's oil, negate the influence of the opposition within Iran, and antagonize a majority of the Islamic population from Africa to Indonesia. Iran would prove to be much more difficult adversary than either Saddam's Iraq or the Taliban in Afghanistan.

Neocons and our own militarists would love to have us in a perpetual war with one part of the world or another, but it should be obvious that we have fallen repeatedly for Osama bin Laden's plan to trap us into just such an expensive and debilitating conflict. As well as all of the countries where we are already at war, Iran poses no existential threat to the US. A bigger threat is the hubris of our own militarists. It is only the blatant falsehoods being perpetrated by pundits such as Mr Broder that push us towards additional conflicts, which threaten to bleed our economic power and reduce our democratic freedoms.

 

DSMITH9949

4:52 PM ET

November 1, 2010

Crazy old Jewish man

Broder is not crazy. If he is crazy then Joe Lieberman, Bill Kristol, Krauthammer, Richard Greenburg, john Podhoretz,, Chuck Shumer, Chris Wallace, Cohen, like all of the other AIPAC warmongers who worship at the alter of Zionism.

Fighting proxy wars for Israel is becoming a passion with these folks. Who can blame Broder. They got numbskull Bush to lead us into an Israeli inspired war against Iraq, why not Iran? He certainly has the networks and mainstream press on his side. I have yet to see one pundit on television that is against invading Iran. Christiane Armanpour being the exception.

 

ACOMPANHANTESR7G

5:32 PM ET

November 1, 2010

Acompanhante

yea, North Korea already has nukes and will inevitably collapse within 25 years. Russia and China have the potential to end human civilization if their leadership ever has a really bad day. thanks!
acompanhantes | acompanhantes loiras | acompanhantes morenas | acompanhantes mulatas | acompanhantes orientais | acompanhantes coroas | acompanhantes ruivas | duplas de acompanhantes |

 

Passport, FP’s flagship blog, brings you news and hidden angles on the biggest stories of the day, as well as insights and under-the-radar gems from around the world.

Read More