Friday, October 29, 2010 - 5:29 PM
This story is still very much unfolding and past experience has taught that it's dangerous to make too many assumptions about these incidents in the early hours (not that that's stopping anyone on Cable news right now). But here are two quick observations:
The good news: Even by the standards of the underpants-bomber era, sending bombs by UPS and FedEx from Yemen to a synagogue in Chicago does not strike me as the most sophisticated of plots. Whatever security systems UPS and FedEx have in the sorting facilities seemed to work pretty well in this case and even if they hadn't, I would hope that a strange UPS package from Yemen might arouse some suspicion at most American shuls.
The bad news: Today, law enforcement agencies in several countries were put on high alert, two global corporations -- FedEx and UPS -- had to disrupt services and inspect dozens of packages around the world, Canadian fighter jets were mobilized, passengers on board a completely innocent commercial flight were scared out of their wits, the president of the United States made a statement on TV, the American Jewish community feels increasingly vulnerable, new security measures will be put in place for international shipments for at least a few weeks if not indefinitely, and the U.S. media will spend the next few days talking about the threat from al Qaeda in the Arabian peninsula.
So for the price of two small improvised explosive devices, which I'm guessing is not all that high in Yemen, plus UPS shipping fees, AQIM, or whoever is behind this, probably cost the governments of the United States, Canada, Britain, and the UAE millions of dollars and bought themselves weeks of free publicity.
Even when these guys lose they win.
This whole incident struck me as the current administration hyping up what are in fact relatively common and feckless attempts at harassment rather than actual security threats. And they did so because there are elections next week and wanted to impress people that they're "fighting terrorism", and that rocking the boat isn't what we should want in an era of 'perpetual war'.
What would have been the outcome had these 'packages' been delivered? Some wounded rabbis? A damaged mailbox? Aren't more people hurt by motorcycle accidents every day? This is inconsequential BS being inflated into 'international terrorism'. Yes, they disrupted systems and received unwarranted attention in the media, but to what end? We are far more damaged and threatened by our own political establishment every day, which uses wars as campaign promises and routinely enact laws robbing the public of power and financial security. I think we'd be better off if politicians decided to *do nothing*, and simply ended their wasteful attempts at security theater. We're going to eventually leave Iraq and Afghanistan, leaving neither particularly better-off, and need new enemies to turn into existential threats. Perhaps they're lining up the successors now, choosing smaller flies to swat so they can declare an easy victory that has so far eluded them.
Passport, FP’s flagship blog, brings you news and hidden angles on the biggest stories of the day, as well as insights and under-the-radar gems from around the world.
Read More
(1)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE