Thursday, September 23, 2010 - 6:16 AM

At one point in Diamonds Are Forever, the 1971 James Bond thriller, Agent 007 asks the villain, who has covertly amassed a stockpile of valuable gems: "What do you intend to do with those diamonds?"
"An excellent question," the evil criminal mastermind, Ernst Stavro Blofeld, replies with a diabolical grin. "And one which will be hanging on the lips of the world quite soon." Bond gets his answer quickly enough: a satellite-rigged laser powerful enough to hold the world hostage.
Hu Jintao is no Blofeld, but if Chinese leaders are trying to provide a readymade plot for the next Bond film, they may have succeeded with today's news that China has quietly begun blocking Japan's supply of rare earth elements, used in everything from Priuses and iPads to wind turbines, oil refineries, and smart bombs.
Such a move, which Chinese officials have denied, would represent a sharp, sudden escalation in the ongoing diplomatic dispute between China and Japan over an island chain in the East China Sea. Real or imagined, the threat is credible, and it's been a long time coming.
In 1992, Deng Xiaoping, the late Chinese leader, reportedly declared, "There is oil in the Middle East; there is rare earth in China." His comment spawned a crash program to develop and exploit China's vast reserves of the metals, estimated at 57 percent of the world total. It wasn't easy: Though most of the 17 elements known as rare earth minerals (numbers 57 through 71, as well as a couple others, on the periodic table) are not actually all that rare, they are difficult and costly to extract. Seven years after Deng's remarks, his successor Jiang Zemin ordered the Chinese state to go a step further. "Improve the development and applications of rare earth," he instructed, "and change the resource advantage into economic superiority."
If anything, Deng was too generous to the Middle East, which today pumps less than half the world's oil and still relies heavily on Western expertise. Today, China has become dominant in rare earths in ways the Saudi royal family could only dream, driving others out of the business, and now controls as much as 97 percent of the global market. According to a recent paper by Cindy Hurst, an analyst for the U.S. Army's Foreign Military Studies Office, that figure may even understate China's supremacy: Beijing has also poured untold millions into basic and applied research on rare earth elements, and runs two state laboratories employing hundreds of scientists devoted exclusively to the subject. The world's only two journals dedicated to rare earth metals are in Chinese.
This isn't the first time rare earths have been big news. Last year, Britain's Daily Telegraph reported that Beijing was considering altogether banning its exports of the stuff -- a story that provoked alarm among high-tech manufacturers and Pentagon planners. Any such ban has yet to be imposed, but China has actually been tightening its chokehold over the strategic commodities for several years now, preferring to use the minerals in its own factories in the hopes of moving up the supply value chain. Chinese premier Wen Jiabao hinted at the thinking in a forum Wednesday with American business leaders. "An iPod is sold at $299, and China in the manufacturing link will only get $6 for it," he complained. As of 2008, China was consuming more than half of the rare earth elements it produced, while smugglers also absconded with a significant chunk.
Initiatives are now underway to revitalize the industry outside China -- a business once dominated by the United States. In April, Molycorp Minerals, a U.S. firm based in Colorado, announced a $500 million plan to refurbish Mountain Pass, a California mine that, before closing in 2002 due to low-cost Chinese competition and environmental concerns, had once been the world's leading producer of rare earth metals (ironically, China nearly acquired Mountain Pass in 2005 as part of its failed bid for Unocal, the U.S. energy company that then owned the mine).
South African, Canadian, and Australian companies are all racing to develop their own mines, though as the New York Times' Keith Bradsher notes, these plans are fraught with risk and questionable economic rewards. "One potential threat," Hurst warns, "is that, while China's reduction in export quotas is currently causing prices to go up, if China were to turn that around and bring prices back down, this could potentially put these and other companies out of business even before they become fully operational."
There is also talk of setting up a U.S. stockpile for rare earth elements, as South Korea and Japan have already done, but any such plans for an American "strategic metals reserve" remain embryonic. It may be time to get cracking: According to the latest projections by Dudley Kingsnorth, an industry consultant, China could be consuming nearly its entire annual production of rare earth elements by as early as 2014.
Some rare earth elements matter more than others. Among the most important is dysprosium, a silky, silvery metal used to make hybrid motors, lasers, nuclear reactors, and computer hard drives. Ninety-nine percent of it is produced in China through a laborious, expensive process (appropriately enough, the element's name is derived from a Greek word meaning "difficult to get at"). Mountain Pass doesn't contain significant amounts of dysprosium, which is critical for the so-called permanent magnets used in many critical components of American defense systems, such as precision-guided munitions -- and Chinese officials have warned that their supplies are running low.
All this has many in the U.S. government and the defense industry worried. An April 2010 report by the U.S. General Accountability Office estimated that it will take as many as 15 years before the United States can rebuild its domestic rare earths industry -- assuming a number of legal, technical, and financial hurdles can be overcome. The Pentagon is studying the military's vulnerability, and is expected to come out with its initial findings later this month -- but the GAO has already found "a wide variety of defense systems and components," including the M1 A2 Abrams tank, "that are dependent on rare earth materials for functionality and are provided by lower-tier subcontractors in the supply chain." The Department of Energy is working on its own plan, and the House Armed Services Committee has scheduled a hearing on the issue.
In the meantime, Hu Jintao may not have a space laser pointed at our heads, but if you see him fighting the urge to pet a white cat or curl his pinkie finger to his lips, you'll know why.
China will cut Japan down to size to dominate Asia. First order of business for China is to ‘Finlandize’ Japan.
Japan has willingly allowed its economy to become over-dependent on China. That gives China an excellent opportunity to screw Japan as a spat over recent Chinese purchase of Japanese government bonds indicate. It appreciated value of yen, thereby causing the drop in Japanese exports and hence affected Japanese economy. Japan had encouraged its companies to heavily invest in China, resulting in massive technology transfer.
Poor Japan before long will be buckling under Chinese juggernaut while helpless US watches unless Japan decides to develop its own nuclear weapons arsenal. Japan can not rely on US nuclear arsenal because US is in not position to go to war with China over Japan and is already preaching Japan and China to settle the dispute amicably.
Since Japan in the late 19th and early 20th century was run by an extremely brutal emperorship and military leadership, that means that all current living Japanese deserve whatever could possibly happen to them? Freeda, I think you might be insane.
RE: China will "Findlandize" Japan
I'm going to disagree with you on this. Japan might be subsumed by an increasing China, but this does not, and will not be, to the U.S' detriment. Japan will continue, and shall always receive, US military support, and the US has stepped into that role in a variety of stuations for other Southeast Asia countries as China expands it's territorial claims. This is a great for a variety of reasons, most importantly, they are chits to trade away and potential bases should we go to war. At present, the US can claim unconditional support for Japan in this dispute, then soften her stance for DOHA trade concessions, currency apprectiaion concessions, or NK six party talk discussions. Consequences of lowering our support in this instance? minimal. Japan will lose face but her domestic politics don't allow for the increased military buildup that would supplant the need for American military support. Simply put, this little spat over a fishing captain can help the US' long term regional goals.
I wrote a paper on this a year ago explaining the difficulties involved in moving from fossil fuels to renewables as renewable tech is highly dependent on REMs. Thus the U.S. would be trading, in a sense, fossil fuel dependence from unsavory Middle Eastern, African, and Latin American governments, to REM dependence from China. It is a lose lose situation unfortunately, and if China continues closing its REM market it could pose a serious security threat to the U.S. (As the article points out - modern weapons systems rely heavily on REMs).
I just make 3 points
1.China's rare earth deposits in the world was actually lower than market expectations as many large mines were found in other countries.(On a per-capita level, China has become a country with scarce rare earth resources) According to a report entitled "Rare earth elements: the global supply chain" by Marc Humphries, energy policy analyst from the Congressional Research Service of the United States, China's rare earth reserves accounted for 36 percent of the world's total in 2009, but output hit 120,000 tonnes, or 97 percent of the world's total. In comparison, rare earth reserves in the United States made up 13 percent of the world's total without any production last year. It expected the world's rare earth demand to reach 180,000 tonnes by 2012. Since 13% of the world's total is enough for US to use, why US expected all its REM supplies from China? I think America is not short of REM, what it's short of is the"cheap REM“ from China. But everyone knows that its stupid to sell your rare resource at a low price, because it has not only value of exchange but also value of use.
2 Every country has it own "National Strategic Reserve". Look at how US Helium Strategy has threatened supply of the world. There is no article from FP to analyze the Helium fact just because its a US magazine?
Did you even read his statement?
did you really understand what i meaned
The bargaining of REM has never been a good deal or profitable for China since China sold at a low price. U.S. is afraid of "one potential threat that is that while China's reduction in export quotas is currently causing prices to go up, if China were to turn that around and bring prices back down, this could potentially put these and other companies out of business even before they become fully operational", but it cant cover the fact that US has been benefit from the cheap Chinese REM for years and China has no obligation to always consider US's interest instead of its own. Why China still need to keep the cheap supply of REM with little rate of return for US? China is not Jesus. If US consider China's cutting REM supply as kinda of threat, why not examine itself? 14% of REM is not a small portion, but how much of REM has US contributed to the world supply? China's always cunning and US is always the potential victim. When China stop conceding to keep US's strictly dominating role, it will be a threat. that's the logic? lol But you should know that China has no obligation to keep US's strictly dominating role at the cost of sacrificing its own interest.
Crying for something that one does not produce
Good that you include the paragraph that starts with "Initiatives are now underway to revitalize the industry outside China -- a business once dominated by the United States." and the one that follows.
I don't recall if the West ever once demanded that China disclosed its silk production method. Or, is it because back then, the U.S. had not yet existed?
When it comes to top-notch technologies currently in the U.S. possession, China and other countries at least offer to buy them.
This is a must-read article...
for any country that has been coerced into selling its products -- and sell them usually at a very low price.
The question is: should China be forced to sell these stuff to the U.S. (and her allies) so that they can use these stuff to build even more powerful weapons to contain, threaten and break-up China?
Passport, FP’s flagship blog, brings you news and hidden angles on the biggest stories of the day, as well as insights and under-the-radar gems from around the world.
Read More
(9)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE