Monday, August 2, 2010 - 12:13 PM

Depending on who you talk to, Swedish Web host PRQ could be the Internet's equivalent of Mos Eisley -- a "wretched hive of scum and villainy" -- or a blessed underground haven for free speech. That's because it agrees to host practically anyone, from Chechen rebels to pedophile support leagues to everybody's favorite transparency organization, WikiLeaks. As Mashable called it last week, PRQ might as well be the Swiss bank of Internet providers.
Like real Swiss banks, PRQ's reputation rests on a "boundless" commitment to privacy and security. The firm, founded in 2004 by a small team of Internet warriors claiming to love the Internet and its possibilities for openness, stops short of publishing "very obviously illegal" content. But anything goes as long as it doesn't violate Swedish law, and the Web host claims to be prepared to take on bad press, crusading lawyers, boycotts -- even angry mobs.
Incidentally, PRQ is run by Gottfrid Svartholm and Fredrik Neij, the very same people who in 2004 launched a controversial file-sharing index, The Pirate Bay. Though the service merely aggregates links to copyrighted material rather than offering up the media itself, Svartholm and Neij were sentenced to a year in prison after being found guilty of assistance to copyright infringement in 2009. Since then, Sweden's Pirate Party (which holds a single seat in the European Parliament) has offered to take WikiLeaks off PRQ's hands. The political party already hosts The Pirate Bay.
With so many options out there, it's a wonder al Qaeda's Inspire magazine is still a print-only operation.
m.a.r.c. / Flickr.com
You're comparing the PRQ to al Qaeda? You see the belief in total transparency and radical free speech a la par with suicide bombings? Seriously?
Do you think that that snide, catty, deeply unfunny joke at the end of your piece will build rapport with your readers? Trivializing a group of deranged religious fanatics that have claimed thousands of innocent lives is not funny, Brian.
That kind of hyperbole is for 12 year-olds. I know it is entirely in your interest as a larval-stage hagiographer of power to appear dismissive of Mr. Assange's and wikileaks' efforts to make REAL journalism, the kind that affects the course of history and causes discomfort to the powerful; particularly since your attempts at journalism are the imbecilic triviality of gotcha blog fodder. But still:
"With so many options out there, it's a wonder al Qaeda's Inspire magazine is still a print-only operation."???
Embarrassing, and now with the internet, forever tied to your name, as well as your sophomoric Star-Wars reference. Congratulations, Brian!
Obviously you are unable to actually read and analyze content, I suggest you return to school and politely ask your English teacher to give you some extra lessons on the matter.
The point that was being made was that the web host will host virtually anything so long as it stays within the letter of the law.
The matter of the Pirate Party is actually an interesting one, much like Hamas* it sounds like an area where an elected party (albeit with only one seat) is involved in an area that can be called 'illegal'. I imagine this must be a legal headache trying to figure out what can and can't be done.
* I expect to be demonized in 3,2,1...
I think their mission to support free speech is an important one. Lots of governments would like to shut down wikileaks but I hope there will be always one hoster providing a safe harbour to them. I'm rather curious though whether their immunity will protect them from lawsuits. At least here in Germany the governement would try to withdraw immunity.
Fabian, Webdesign
So, PRQ are against non-legal censorship. Excellent!
Everything that someone dislikes should not be forbidden.
Since the US does not prosecute war criminals above the rank of sergeant (and those get a slap on the wrist) sites like WikiLeaks fills an important niche.
Hopefully someone will leak evidence so damning that not even the US government can ignore it. Although since George II gets away with ordering torture I'm not sure what that would be.
Go WikiLeaks!
They are just doing there job, hosting whatever they want withing the limits of the law? I'm not sure how that's news... If its allowed by law, why not host it to make money. I'm sure pretty much every major corporation has done worse to get where its at now.
And so my reply won't be eaten by the grammar police
I meant their, not there in the first sentence. Any other mistakes I can't be bothered to fix.
Passport, FP’s flagship blog, brings you news and hidden angles on the biggest stories of the day, as well as insights and under-the-radar gems from around the world.
Read More
(7)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE