Wednesday, June 16, 2010 - 3:39 PM

The French government announced today that it will raise the country's retirement age from 60 to 62, a move likely to be fiercely resisted by French labor unions. The retirement age was already one of the lowest in Europe and economists have long pushed for it to be raised. They aren't the only ones. As part of its ongoing austerity measures, Greece's government is pushing to raise its retirement age from 61-63.
Of course, the legal pension age is only part of the problem. As this chart from the OECD shows, if you look at when the average worker actually retires, the French are calling it quits earlier than any other developed country:
Moves like France's and Greece's are simply inevitable given how long people are living today. By some estimates, bore than half the babies born in France and other developed countries since 2000 will live to the age of 100, and having them out of the work force for half of that time simply won't work economically.
So are we simply doomed to a long, dull life of endless drudgery? Perhaps not. In a recent article published in the Lancet, a group of demographers suggested some ways that our ideas about work could be transformed to better fit modern lifespans. I wrote about some of them in the most recent print issue of FP:
Raising the retirement age will be a necessary first step, the researchers suggest. This carries some risks, not least of which is what the report's lead author, Kaare Christensen of the Danish Aging Research Center, calls the "Prince Charles problem." Just as Charles has spent a lifetime as king-in-waiting behind his now-octogenarian mother, Christensen foresees a bottleneck of older workers preventing younger employees from advancing until their own golden years. One solution is to change the way careers are structured over time, by creating part-time, semiretired positions for seniors and perhaps even allowing workers to put in fewer hours during the years when they're raising children. "Most people have an enormous amount of work between age 20 and 40," Christensen says. "Why not postpone it until you're older and the kids don't want to see you anyway?"
Perhaps something for Nicolas Sarkozy's government to consider as it faces down the inevitable crippling strikes.
In the history of French labor strikes, have they ever achieved meaningful change?
Like so many countries (and families), they have spent beyond their means, and face financing long retirement.
Working longer ... not great.
But I fail to see how striking (again!) will make things better.
I am sick and tired at how the politicans and dumb ass economists try to whip our oldfolks to work harder and longer, because we "cant afford" to have them retire, whilst theres record unemployment among the young (which we apparently CAN afford).
It would be better for every one, if we retire more old folks sooner, giving them a better old age and get the young ones into the workforce and lettting the young get started with their lifes rather than going on the dole and possibly be up to no good.
Do you really think that today unemployment is because youth is lazy ? What if it is because of China ? What about higher educational requirements ? If you are really old you would have had to only pass a degree to get a decent job. Today, dentists are working as waiters, physicists are working as bartenders. When we look at old people like you we seriously feel that it is good if that old coot takes some load off his chest.
As life-spans are increasing in much of the world, it is inevitable that the 'normal' retirement age will have to increase - unless there is a way to get people to save more for their own retirement. A simple sit-down to discuss retirement with a financial planner would shock most US citizens of any age when they see what it would take to live comfortably (not lavishly) in retirement for a period of 25-30 years.
Too many people have failed to plan for retirement, expecting that Social Security might provide sufficient income for them even as corporate pension plans become a thing of the past. The number of US corporations who have underfunded their employee pension plans or terminated them has grown steadliy over the past 20 years, and most people would be shocked to learn how insufficient their pension plans have become. And since defined benefit plans are not portable (as 401Ks are), even those who are vested probably have no real concept of what they might receive. Most people in 401k plans are not saving anywhere near the maximum amount they might, because they have children to educate, medical bills to pay, too-large mortgages, or other debt to service (credit cards, etc).
I keep reading reports about how little even workers over 55 have in their retirement savings accounts, and it is obvious that most of us will have to consider working beyond the age at which our parents retired, or face severe poverty when they do retire. Meanwhile, all the incentives in our society are aimed at consumption, not savings.
It's a good thing the French, Greeks, and soon the Spaniards are waking up to some harsh realities. Some commentators have said already that it is too little too late and that even the modest step that France has taken of increasing retirement from 60 to 62 is not nearly enough. But a long journey begins with ....
The US and its overly stimulated citizenry will be next. Many of the so called baby-boomers are going to retire early, and live long enough to be sorry for it.
(I am 66 - still working - house paid for - no debt - maxing out on my 401K - decent retirement savings - two pensions from former employers - collecting SS since I turned 66 and it's going in the bank - making as much money as I ever have and no plans to retire. And I don't feel the least bit comfortable about it. Many of my friends have been forced to retire before they were financially ready and they are really not happy about it.)
Do you really think that today unemployment is because youth is lazy ? What if it is because of China ? What about higher educational requirements ? If you are really old you would have had to only pass a degree to get a decent job. Today, dentists are working as replica omega waiters, physicists are working as bartenders. When we look at old people like you we seriously feel that it is good if that old coot takes some load off his chest.
Passport, FP’s flagship blog, brings you news and hidden angles on the biggest stories of the day, as well as insights and under-the-radar gems from around the world.
Read More
(5)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE