Posted By Brian Fung Share

It's no secret that Japan seeks an end to the longstanding moratorium on commercial whaling passed by the International Whaling Commission (IWC) in 1986. Nor is Japan a stranger to allegations that it's bribed other IWC members to vote for its position. But now, the London Times is carrying what it says is proof that at least six states agreed to vote for Japan's position in exchange for aid:

Japan denies buying the votes of IWC members. However, The Sunday Times filmed officials from pro-whaling governments admitting [...] They voted with the whalers because of the large amounts of aid from Japan. One said he was not sure if his country had any whales in its territorial waters. Others are landlocked.

The governments of St Kitts and Nevis, the Marshall Islands, Kiribati, Grenada, Republic of Guinea and Ivory Coast all entered negotiations to sell their votes in return for aid.

The top fisheries official for Guinea said Japan usually gave his minister a “minimum” of $1,000 a day spending money in cash during IWC and other fisheries meetings.

If the Times' report is true, Japan's efforts to overturn the whaling ban may have suffered a major setback. But anti-whaling activists shouldn't rejoice just yet. Debate surrounding the issue has gotten progressively more intense in the last few months as the IWC prepares to consider just what Japan is looking for -- a (temporary) suspension of the moratorium, to be voted on later this month in Morocco. The meeting also follows a recent breakdown in relations between Japan and Australia, whose government sued Tokyo on June 1 for repeatedly violating the IWC whaling ban.

Junko Kimura/Getty Images

EXPLORE:ENVIRONMENT, JAPAN
 

GRANT

10:48 PM ET

June 15, 2010

Every nation has some

Every nation has some ludicrous spending, but this is just ridiculous. Japan tied God only knows how much aid to votes on WHALING. This isn't a military contract, it isn't oil or even lumber. Whales aren't even that important a piece of Japanese cuisine, to the best of my knowledge whaling isn't even close to a significant portion of the Japanese economy and in terms of international politics Japan gains literally nothing from this. So what's the logic? Has it descended to the point where the bureaucrats can't see it in terms of cost and gain and have instead locked themselves into seeing it as a point of national prestige? How can you possibly justify tying aid to votes on whaling?

 

Passport, FP’s flagship blog, brings you news and hidden angles on the biggest stories of the day, as well as insights and under-the-radar gems from around the world.

Read More