Wednesday, May 19, 2010 - 11:20 AM

The Turkish- and Brazilian-brokered nuclear enrichment deal with Iran earlier this week was widely seen as a setback for the Obama administration's nonproliferation agenda, and indeed the White House didn't exactly shower the agreement with praise before continuing its push to slap new sanctions on Iran.
But according to Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu, the whole thing was done with Obama's encouragement. The National reports:
Turkey’s foreign minister, Ahmet Davutoglu, however, credited Mr Obama’s policy of engaging with Tehran for Ankara’s success in pursuing a diplomatic solution. “[Obama] paved the way for this process,” Mr Davutoglu said during a news conference in Istanbul. Turkey’s prime minister, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, had been “encouraged” to pursue dialogue with Tehran by Mr Obama during a recent, high-level nuclear conference in New York.
While I'm sure Erdogan and Obama discussed Iran, it seems unlikely that anything that explicit was said. At a briefing on Monday -- before Davutoglu's comments -- White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said that the president had "not talked directly" with the leaders of Turkey or Brazil as the deal was being put together.
Turkey and Brazil are reportedly infuriated by the new U.S.-backed agreement on sanctions and Davutoglu's suggestion that Obama was for the deal before he was against it isn't going to sit well in Washingtion.
Hat tip: RFE/RL Transmission
There's nothing inherently wrong with the deal, but the problem for the US and others is that it only gets us about 10% of the way. Brazilian and Turkish leaders are trying to convince us that this deal meets all of the IAEA and UN criteria, but nothing could be further from the truth. This deal allows Iran controlled access to LEU for its research reactor. The deal does NOT address Iran's nuclear weapons program, its enrichment program, or its years of flouting the NPT treaty to which it is a party.
The US absolutely should continue to press for sanctions until Iran chooses to play by the rules of the civilized world. Let's not let Iran and Brazil try to convince us that --with this deal-- Iran has rejoined the community of nations.
"but the problem for the US and others is that it only gets us about 10% of the way"
You can't ask for 100% compliance on something so completely central to the Iranian Governments ideals immediately. Noone would accept that. Like I said on the other article about this on FP, its the same reason the Civil War or Revolutionary war happened. It was too much against the grain too fast. Rather than ask for everything immediately (I know, this is the "Entitlement Generation" so it might be hard to do), START with this deal and go from there. They've accepted something, its something to work on.
And for those of you that suggest that Iran hasn't helped it case by never really working with us, I agree, but my premise still stands. We have never asked for just a little starter course (just like dinner, you start with something small and work your way to the main plate), we've always only dealt with the complete compliance of everything that we decided was good, mostly without their input...
Would you accept that deal? I think not.
Passport, FP’s flagship blog, brings you news and hidden angles on the biggest stories of the day, as well as insights and under-the-radar gems from around the world.
Read More
(2)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE