Posted By David Kenner Share

The news out of the Middle East today is that high-ranking former U.S. officials have been holding quiet talks with the Palestinian movement Hamas, which rules the Gaza Strip. These contacts, which included the State Department's approval of a debate between a senior U.S. diplomat and a Hamas representative, have been interpreted by Hamas -- and Fatah, its rival -- as a softening of the U.S. stance against the party.

Among those leading the charge is Rob Malley, who, along with other former U.S. officials, met with Hamas Foreign Minister Mahmud Zahar in Zurich last summer. A little history: Malley, Middle East and North Africa program director for the International Crisis Group, was forced to abandon his advisory role to the Obama campaign in summer 2008, due to his contacts with Hamas.

In the wake of the subsequent political fallout, Malley backed away from calls for high-level engagement with the organization. "I've never come out in favor of U.S. engagement with Hamas," he told a gathering at the Wilson Center last February."Let's not engage with Hamas. That's fine by me."

A little over a year later he was in Zurich, participating in what he described to the Wall Street Journal as "an effort to clarify what Washington's policy is and understand what Hamas's views are." For someone who was previously so dismissive of the idea, Malley does appear to be partaking in something suspiciously similar to engagement.

Jamie Rose/Getty Images

 
Facebook|Twitter|Reddit

PCDE

12:06 PM ET

April 3, 2010

Negotiate with Terrorists?

What's the big deal? In Iraq, not only did America negotiate with terrorists, we also funded them and armed them!

Anyone remember Da Surge, Sons of Iraq, The Awakening?

These people had American blood on their hands and yet we still made deals with them. If it was succesful in Iraq, why not try it in Palestine?

 

CHET380

3:08 PM ET

April 3, 2010

Terrorists vs. Duly-Elected Political Entity

As a terrorist group, Hamas has a long history - it's easy to see why the US won't negotiate.

However, it is the only political entity that provides services to the inhumanely downtrodden Gazans, so in most similar circumstances the US would be at the forefront in providing assistance.

Of course, the malign AIPAC influence has to be taken into account in the calculus.

 

WILL2713

4:45 PM ET

April 3, 2010

talk to Khamas

Khamas is no more of a terrorist than the State of Israel according to the Goldstone report. And as far as they recognizing the State of Israel, Israel doesn't recognize the State of Palestine, so what is the big deal? The Likud charter says no Palestine, so who cares what is in the Hamas charter. Khamas is the way the Israelis pronounce Hamas although they know better, but they choose to display their ignorance.

 

Passport, FP’s flagship blog, brings you news and hidden angles on the biggest stories of the day, as well as insights and under-the-radar gems from around the world.

Read More