Thursday, March 11, 2010 - 2:04 PM

At his State of the Union address, President Barack Obama swore to double U.S. exports in five years. At the time, some pundits (including one here) scoffed at the idea. Doubling exports, of course, means convincing the world to buy twice as much of the stuff the U.S. produces. That will be no easy feat, particularly given that just about every high-income economy is looking for an export-led recovery.
But it is a feat that has been accomplished before. I used Commerce Department trade data to make the above graph. It turns out, the last time the United States had a year that doubled its trade level from five years before was 1981; the average five-year increase is around 140 percent.
Still, Obama's plan to double the number by 2015 does not seem so far-fetched. For one, trade has fallen due to the recession, meaning the United States needs to double a lower-than average number.
Obama started to detail how he plans to double exports at the annual conference of the Export-Import Bank today. First: panels. He is creating an "export promotion cabinet" including representatives from state, treasury, agriculture, commerce, and other agencies, and creating an "export council" with adivsers from the private sector. Second: trade regulation reform, to make it easier for businesses to put products and offer services on the global market. Third: better governmental promotion of small- and medium-sized businesses.
to me, this was the dumbest pledge obama has made thus far. while it may be politically safe in that he wont be running again in 5 years, it really damaged his credibily for us folks in the "reality based community". that graph you put up is nice, but the fact remains that the period 1976-1981 encompassed the formative years of the new global trade regime. This, much more than any other policy decision, is the reason for the jump in exports. The only way obama is going to increase exports is by lessening the tax burdens on corporations and exports and by signing more free trade agreements (which will probably bring more imports than exports, thus undercutting the initial goal). he also might lift high-tech bans on exports to China. even with all of these policies, i find it doubtful that he will succeed. There is no doubt that we need to expand exports if for no other reason than we can't afford to buy everything we make. still, i'd prefer a realistic strategy rather than empty rhetoric. john roberts, for all his faults, is correct in saying that the State of the Union has become a political pep-rally.
Passport, FP’s flagship blog, brings you news and hidden angles on the biggest stories of the day, as well as insights and under-the-radar gems from around the world.
Read More
(1)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE