Posted By Blake Hounshell Share

It looked this morning like U.S. Vice President Joe Biden was going to have a nice, friendly visit to Israel, even though the government there announced on the eve of his trip that it was approving new construction in an existing settlement bloc in the West Bank.

"The bond between our two nations has been and will remain unshakable," Biden wrote this morning in President Shimon Peres's guestbook. "Only together can we achieve lasting peace in the region." He also praised Peres as "articulate."

The State Department's initial statement on the matter was exceedingly cautious, suggesting that the United States was willing to swallow Israel's argument that the new building didn't violate Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's 10-month moratoriumon on new settlement construction.

But then, the Israeli Interior Ministry added another wrinkle, announcing a plan to build 1,600 new homes in hotly contested East Jerusalem. The official story is that Netanyahu didn't know the announcement was coming, and that Interior Minister Eli Yishai, who heads the hard-line Shas Party, was freelancing. Apparently the prime minister's office is looking into the matter.

Biden came out with this harsh statement today:

"I condemn the decision by the government of Israel to advance planning for new housing units in East Jerusalem. The substance and timing of the announcement, particularly with the launching of proximity talks, is precisely the kind of step that undermines the trust we need right now and runs counter to the constructive discussions that I’ve had here in Israel. We must build an atmosphere to support negotiations, not complicate them. This announcement underscores the need to get negotiations under way that can resolve all the outstanding issues of the conflict. The United States recognizes that Jerusalem is a deeply important issue for Israelis and Palestinians and for Jews, Muslims and Christians. We believe that through good faith negotiations, the parties can mutually agree on an outcome that realizes the aspirations of both parties for Jerusalem and safeguards its status for people around the world. Unilateral action taken by either party cannot prejudge the outcome of negotiations on permanent status issues. As George Mitchell said in announcing the proximity talks, "we encourage the parties and all concerned to refrain from any statements or actions which may inflame tensions or prejudice the outcome of these talks."

UPDATE: Yishai is now saying he didn't know about the 1,600 new housing units either, as it was all just "a technical authorization in Jerusalem, which isn't part of the settlement freeze" and therefore didn't require his signoff. This, frankly, doesn't pass the laugh test.

Nor does this:

"If I'd have known, I would have postponed the authorization by a week or two since we had no intention of provoking anyone," Yishai said. "It is definitely unpleasant that this happened during Biden's visit. If the committee members would have known that the approval would have escalated to such a situation, they would have informed me," Yishai emphasized.

Haaretz also quotes "a high-ranking official in Jerusalem" saying that Netanyahu has "no problem" with the new construction but would have preferred not to embarrass Biden. Nice of him.

So what should the United States do? The danger is that  whoever was behind this little maneuver will get what they want -- deep-sixing the recently announced proximity talks -- if the Obama administration moves to somehow punish Israel for this ploy. But the United States is not in the business of punishing Israel for major sleights like this (most likely, Biden's statement was the end of it, and maybe some Israeli officials will have more trouble getting their calls returned for a few weeks). That leaves the unpalatable option of letting the Palestinians walk away from the table before they get there, which is the equivalent of throwing the Israeli hard-liners into ye olde briar patch.

Debbi Hill - Pool/ Getty Images

 

WILLIAM DEB. MILLS

1:20 AM ET

March 10, 2010

Biden Harsh?

"Harsh statement?"

Obama should recall the US ambassador for consultations, and Biden should have taken the first plane out.

This was a two-pronged, clearly intentional dismissal of fundamental US policy designed to demonstrate to the world that US policy toward the Levant is controlled by Israel.

US global influence relies greatly on the degree to which it is treated with respect. Israel's action was designed to humiliate the US. Kudos to Biden for finally standing up...but mere words in response to this highly substantive Israeli knife in the back will not suffice. Pending some substantive US punishment of Israel, the US is the laughing stock of the world.

One appropriate US response could be to divert Biden to some neutral spot, say, Ankara, for a publicly advertized meeting with all Palestinian factions, most definitely including Hamas.

 

TROLLO

1:37 AM ET

March 10, 2010

something wrong with the skin

Is that a bad picture or maybe it looks like there something wrong with the skin of U.S. Vice President Joe Biden and he was going to have a nice, friendly yeast infection treatment right wehn returning from the friendly visit.

 

SASHENKA

6:01 AM ET

March 10, 2010

Words are Not Enough

I agree with the above comment. The US-Israel relationship has become a joke of the tail wagging the dog, to the detriment of US national interests and security. The US continues to allow Israel and the American Jewish lobby to tie its hands and undermine its reputation and role in international affairs. Moreover, this is incident is indicative of why the US has failed to mediate a resolution to the conflict, because we continually operate negotiations under the premise that this is a conflict between Palestinians and israeli's, failing to acknolwedge America's integral role in the conflict.

On another note, while I'm glad that Biden spoke so bluntly, I do wonder how this could have taken anyone by surprise. There have been reports out for weeks that Israel was planning to take unilateral action in East Jerusalem to demolish Palestinian homes for redevelopment. That being said, it almost seems like the public statement by the Interior Minister to that affect was necessary to trigger a reaction by the US.

 

JAYDEE001

1:15 PM ET

March 10, 2010

SAME OLD - SAME OLD

The fact is, Israel does not want peace if it comes at the cost of a Palestinian State on or within their borders. There is no way the announcement of new settlements in East Jeruselem was done without the knowledge of the current leadership, and the timing was certainly intended to be a slap in the face of the US Administration. This is probably a direct response to Obama's efforts to engage in discussions with Iran. They just want the US to know who's in charge (and it ain't us).

The Israelis will continue to put their own interests ahead of those of all other parties, as long as they can count on the US' good will. The short-term interests of their own hardline parties and the most right-wing elements of Israeli society outweigh US or world opinion about their intransigence on all matters Palestinian.

There will be no peace in the middle east until the cost of doing what the Israelis have been doing is sufficiently high to force them to consider the long-term effects of their treatment of the Palestinians. Don't hold your breath.

 

JRACFORR

6:29 PM ET

March 10, 2010

Winner Take All

The leaders of both Israel and Palestine may be convinced to accept a two state solution, But the general population of both entities are currently only interested in a one state solution , a " Winner Take All " solution. Until the average citizen grasp the two state solution nothing can be accomplished. This recent mishap with Joe Biden is no accident it is intended to stop progress in that direction. All political parties both Arab and Jewish have to be ultura nationalist to be elected because that's what the people want. When the final consequence comes to Palestine it will be the fault of the people not there leaders

 

Passport, FP’s flagship blog, brings you news and hidden angles on the biggest stories of the day, as well as insights and under-the-radar gems from around the world.

Read More