Posted By Joshua Keating Share

It's not every day that former presidents write us letters. And here at FP, we knew we had quite a document on our hands when Jimmy Carter took the unusual step of writing in to defend his legacy in response to Walter Russell Mead's article,"The Carter Syndrome." As Jared Keller of the Atlantic noted, "This comparison may be relatively commonplace, but the reaction was not." Since the letter appeared, it's been fascinating to watch the reactions to the letter from both sides of the political spectrum.

Obama's critics were understandably delighted that it was Carter, who was upset by the comparison to Obama. Fox News' Sean Hannity was positively giddy: 

Former President Jimmy Carter is fuming. Given his disastrous record in office you would think that he would be happy to be compared to the Anointed One, but apparently President Obama has made such a mess that even Carter is now distancing himself.[...]

Judging by the way things are going, I predict by 2012 President Obama will want to be compared to Carter.

Rob Port of the Say Anything blog had a similar reaction:  "You know things are bad when Jimmy Carter doesn’t want his legacy tarnished by comparisons to you."

As Drew Grant of Mediaite pointed out, this isn't quite correct. Carter's letter was a defense of his own record, and contained no criticism of Obama's. Carter was objecting to the idea that his legacy should be considered a benchmark for failure.

Other writers took note of the anger of Carter's tone.  "[Carter] can get good and cranky when he feels his legacy is being misrepresented," wrote Politico's Glenn Thrush. Tigerhawk said the letter showed that Carter "has the thinnest skin of any postwar president with the possible exception of Richard Nixon. " At RealClearPolitics, Jeremy Lott put the letter foward as an example of "how not to defend your legacy":

Normally, when a piece appears in a major media outlet that riles up a former U.S. president, he calls a few former aides, advisers, and sympathetic academics. They launch a coordinated attack on his behalf without ever quite admitting that they were put up to it. This creates the illusion of a groundswell of support for a venerable public figure and it allows the one time commander-in-chief to appear above the fray. Reporters will ask him about it and he can quote the experts who came to his defense.

Instead, Carter decided to take matters into own hands. The results are not good. From first sentence to last, his letter demonstrates paper thin skin, arrogance, and the flawed judgment that turned him into a one-term president.

Not all commentators found the letter unconvincing, though. For instance, the New America Foundation's Michael Cohen called Carter and Brzezinski's letters "a pretty compelling case on behalf Carter's foreign policy legacy."

The funny thing about all of this is that, as Mead himself has wrote in his response, the article wasn't even really about Carter but about "the intellectual, cultural, and political challenges [Obama] faces.”

Responding on his own blog to the article's critics, Mead writes:

"Of this group of dissenters... President Carter is the only person I’ve voted for, and I  am honored to have his reply, even if we don’t reach the same conclusions."

STAN HONDA/AFP/Getty Images

 
Facebook|Twitter|Reddit

PAPICEK

10:07 PM ET

February 26, 2010

I come down with President Carter in this.

I read Meade's piece, thinking that the parallel might prove interesting, but the article failed the promise of its premise.

And I think by now it can be recognized that, whatever the failings of the Carter administration, one thing the President owes no one is an apology for anything he did.

If anyone cites failings of the Carter administration's foreign policy, it's because the President didn't go far enough in some area of the commentator feels strongly about.

The answer to that is, of course, for the commentator to earn the office himself.

 

BURNINGCHROME

12:01 AM ET

February 27, 2010

Carter can start by appologizing to

1) more than a MILLION dead Afghanis as a result of covertly starting a war there.
2)The American Service People who have died or been injured as they continue to do so in Afghanistan trying to clean up the mess Carter made.
3)The American Service People who have died and injured as a direct result of his withdrawing support for the Shah that has so destabalized the Middle East and drawn the US into 2 wars... so far.
4) to the Democratic party for dragging them so far down

The only accomplishment of J. Carter has been to mitigate the disaster of George W. Jimmy Carter WORST PRESIDENT EVER!!!!!!!

 

REAPERDEUCE

9:27 AM ET

February 27, 2010

Re-living Carter's Failures

In my opinion, the article provides a simple overview: President Obama is like Carter, however, he will not fail as Carter did. Since, FDR, every domestc or foreign policy that we re-implement will fail. We will re-live the same failures with President Obama, however, it will be much greater than President Carter's own legacy. Don't worry President Carter. You may want to distant yourself from Pres. Obama, however, both of you will share lame duck presidencies with a failed domestic policy that hasn't worked in 60 years.

 

SLAMNT

11:54 AM ET

February 27, 2010

Path to tabloid trash!

First we get a silly comparison to an amusement park killer whale being a National Security threat, and now quoting a complete idiot like Sean Hannity from FOX makes me regret renewing my subscription to FP.

There is one thing and one thing only that will keep Obama's profile from being sculptured onto Mount Rushmore as one of the greatest global leaders...the color of his skin. To quote a line from A Few Good Men, idiots like Sean Hannity just "can't handle the truth"! He still believes that the one person who has single handily reversed the women’s movement back a few decades – Sarah Palin is the answer!

I applaud Mr. Carter for having the courage to defend his record and comparison to any other leader, past or present is completely unnecessary.

RK

 

SCOTTGOOSE

2:23 PM ET

February 27, 2010

Another "bad apples" argument gone awry

Just because some gun-toting hicks in Alabama will never respect a black president doesn't mean the rest of the world can't make criticism about the president. If Hilary had come in and tried the same robust agenda -- which I seriously doubt, minus Hilarycare, which she would have handled much better IMO -- the policies would have been slammed in the same manner. Black, purple, green, blue; these are demonstrably critique-worthy initiatives that have gotten the attention they deserve. Will you please stop with the, "You disagree with Obama so it logically follows that you must be a racist." Excuse me, what am I missing?

Now, one's opinion about Sean Hannity notwithstanding (full disclosure: I like his radio show for some comedic relief when I'm in the car), there are obviously a serious of legitimate concerns about Obama. While a sizable amount of the electorate is disenchanted with any "big government" policy -- most of this ilk ascribe to the "Tea Party" label -- not everyone who disagrees with Obama is a racist! This is the worst argument I have ever heard and the only thing worse than the arguments substance is that a former president is drinking the same kool aid!

The nation, according to all the polls from Gallup to Zogby and Rasmussen, all have Obama's approval rating hovering just below 50%. Does that mean half the country is racist? Your just being silly and stubborn because you refuse to believe that Obama could actually be doing a poor job. Obama's silvery tongue could sell a woman with white gloves a feces-popsicle, and he did effectively that with his awe-inspiring campaign.

However, the campaigns over, as Obama reminded McCain, but should have really been reserved for judgement about himself. Give me a break; even Obama terms the opposition to his fiscal plans "legitimate, philosophical disagreements" about policy.

There will always be people, like "Reagan-Conservative" Sean Hannity who gets paid millions to trash Democratic policy and has been for years. Does that make EVERY GOP'er or disenchanted independent a racist? Save this sloppy logic for the birds.

 

SCOTTGOOSE

2:26 PM ET

February 27, 2010

pardon the sloppy malapropism

I mean't series, not serious.

Point is, if Obama was a WASP from Greenwich, Connecticut who had made the exact same plans, the outcry would be exactly the same.

His race is entirely irrelevant, except maybe to you.

 

ANDY764383

6:28 PM ET

February 27, 2010

Jimmy Carter...

Carter is a straight up guy. While his time in office was difficult and not entirely successful, the American people always knew his heart was in the right place. We could only hope that the rest of our politicians are as honest as he is. Carter is a graduate of the Rickover school, and it shows.

 

FLAUTOTRANSPORT

3:28 PM ET

February 28, 2010

Not a fan

Jimmy Carter is in my opinion the worst president ever. Just under him is George Bush and maybe Obama.

I wish we could get a true businessman in the whitehouse. Trump for president

Fred C
http://www.cartransportquotes.com

 

JACK HEISMANN

9:47 PM ET

February 28, 2010

Jimmy Carter's Legacy

I doubt if there is any one individual who has as much influence on my life as former President Carter.

I voted for Carter -- not necessarily on a "Hope and Change" platform, per se, but on those very same principles. Viet Nam, the Watergate scandal, the resignation of both Nixon and Agnew, and Gerald Ford's pardon of Mr. Nixon left a nation eager for Change. We saw that potential, along with Hope for the future in candidate Jimmy Carter.

In the years that followed America seemed to disintegrate. The Soviets were expanding their influence (and aggression) all over the world, while the US appeared helpless to stop them. Carter was backing despots friendly to the US, reminiscent of the Nixon years. That included a very unpopular Mohammad Reza Pahlavi.

So many of Carter's mistakes came from gutting both military and intelligence, while rationalizing, very much like President Obama has done, that negotation among nations would resolve our differences. It was that delusional thinking that had Carter negotiating a peace treaty between Israel and Egypt, while the OPEC states were engaging in a de facto oil boycott of the west. Americans were once again waiting in lines, often blocks long, just to buy gas, if there was any to be sold at all.

Inflation was beyond anything we had ever experienced as Americans and taxes were at all time highs. My 1980 promotion to Director of Account Management came with a lofty 20 percent raise. But with a 12 percent inflation rate and a tax bite that ate up more than half of that raise, I truly wondered if working hard was even worth the effort.

When Americans were taken hostage by the Iranian government, Carter seemed paralyzed. He wanted to 'negotiate' with the Iranians. They played him like a fool. Carter obliged. Even SNL made Cater their poster child. Desperately in need of a rescue, Carter was told by mission commander, the legendary Col. Charlie Beckwith, that after years of neglect the military was in no position to succeed. Carter ordered the rescue anyway, and the disaster that followed is, of course, a stain on our history.

While Richard Nixon was embarrassing, this was the first time that I was actually ashamed to be an American. We joked that if Carter offered himself to Iran in exchange for the hostages, would the Iranians even want him.

It was that fall that this born Liberal-Democrat joined the Regan campaign and for the first time in my life voted Republican. I haven't looked back. I'm staunchly anti-tax having watched how taxation can destroy careers, initiative and growth. Despite being raised in a household where government was considered the savior of the working man, I saw government as the problem, not the cure. At one time, intrigued by the legendary Arabic cultures, I now see the middle east in a far different light. And I consider the world to be very self centered, where America has few friends unless someone in the world wants something from us.

I'm rather sick of hearing the name 'Jimmy Carter' much less his lies and excuses. From my perspective he's a notch or two beneath Richard Nixon vying for the Worst President In History award. And I truly doubt that even in the worst of circumstances, Barak Obama could sink to those depths. While he has made many mistakes, having lived through the misery that was the Carter administration, it's hard to imagine President Obama ever becoming such a pitiful, worthless fool.

Jack Heismann

 

Passport, FP’s flagship blog, brings you news and hidden angles on the biggest stories of the day, as well as insights and under-the-radar gems from around the world.

Read More