Posted By Joshua Keating Share

James Cameron's sci-fi epic Avatar has becoming something of a political rorsarch test around the world. The story of the alien Na'avi's struggles against the invasion of Earth's military-industrial complexhas taken on some surprising allegorical means for movements around the world:

  • Palestinian protesters in the town of Bilin dressed up as Na'avi recently to protest the Israeli occupation of the West Bank.
  • Bolivia's leftist President Evo Morales has praised Avatar as a "profound show of resistance to capitalism and the struggle for the defense of nature."
  • Chinese bloggers have compared the film's story to the exploitation of Chinese citizens by government-backed real estate developers -- a factor that may have contributed to the film being pulled from Chinese theaters.  
  • Activists ran ads in the Hollywood newspaper Variety comparing the Na'avi to India's forest-dwelling indigenous tribe, the Dongria, whose territory is now threatened by a planned bauxite mine.
  • Environmentalists Lori Pottinger compared the story of Avatar to the Brazilian government's plans to build dams in the Amazon Basin.
  • Russian Communists described the film as an attempt to justify Barack Obama's Nobel Peace Prize. 
  • New York Times columinist Ross Douthat called the movie "an apolologia for pantheism."
  • David Boaz of the libertarian Cato Institute says the movie is about "defending property rights".
  • Last but not least, Cameron himself says the movie is an allegory about the U.S. war on terror

Personally, the movie struck me as a critique of counterinsurgency: the humans talked a good game about cultural understanding and minimizing civilian casualties to reassure the folks back home, but they were really just on Pandora to conquer and exploit.

Then again, it could have just been a movie about aliens.

OREN ZIV/AFP/Getty Images

EXPLORE:CULTURE
 
Facebook|Twitter|Reddit

GUYVER

2:58 PM ET

February 17, 2010

Avatar

The movie was full of COIN references. It was a critique of counterinsurgency (with direct references to "winning hearts and minds") and "shock and awe" warfare.

 

TETRISD

11:54 AM ET

February 18, 2010

You're missing animal rights.

You're missing animal rights. Sympathy with the Nav'i demolishes "anthropocentrism" (or the sentiment that the universe revolves around humanity). If one intelligent species (the Nav'i) deserve some rights, why not another intelligent species (like great apes, dolphins, Neanderthals if they existed, etc.)

 

SMCI60652

11:54 AM ET

February 18, 2010

always remember

The Na'avi never snuck on to Earth and blew up buses, ships, embassaies, hijacked planes and flew them into buildings and strapped bombs to themselves and carried out spectacular suicide bombings against people that didn't have a clue what was going on back on their planet, much less would condone it if they did.

So while perhaps a handful of indigenous tribes that are being pushed away because of deforestation and other demands of globalization have a legitimate claim to the film, most of these characters don't.

Certainly not the Palestinians. And Cameron may think his film is a parody of the War on Terror, but it's a special breed of Progressive that deliberately sees his own people as the ultimate embodiment of manipulation, exploitation, and aggression... and the other as ultimately innocent, perenially victimized and forever noble.

 

BELISARIUS19

12:50 PM ET

February 18, 2010

What about cash?

Frankly I assumed the point of the movie was for James Cameron to become a billionaire and win Best Picture for making Pocahontas in Space.

 

Passport, FP’s flagship blog, brings you news and hidden angles on the biggest stories of the day, as well as insights and under-the-radar gems from around the world.

Read More