Wednesday, February 10, 2010 - 11:48 AM
Here are a chart and a graph showing the PIIGS' and the United States' indebtedness -- more specifically, their public debt and 2009 deficit relative to GDP.
Just glancing at the chart, and remembering that the PIIGS are among the weakest economies in Europe, it seems that the United States isn't in great shape either. It's just on par with Spain, whose economy is struggling.
But the United States has a number of advantages that make its debt and deficit picture brighter. In the future, Washington might answer to Beijing when it comes to its debt addiction. But for now, it determines its own fiscal and monetary policy measures. Not so for the euro-using PIIGS. Washington can slash its interest rate to zero, devalue the dollar, and perform quantitative easing -- none of which the PIIGS can do. Plus, Washington has much lower debt costs; much of the country's debt is basically free, due to the dollar's status as the world's reserve currency.
In contrast, countries like Spain and Greece are mostly at the mercy of their partners in the Eurozone. At The Guardian, economist Claus Vistesen notes that there is no "systemic set-up," no playbook, for what the Eurozone should do to prevent or counter the default of one of its members.
The European Central Bank can't bail Greece out, per Europe's own rules -- the Maastricht treaty says that "the Community should not be liable for or assume the commitments of central governments, regional, local or other public authorities of another member state." Simon Johnson argues that the IMF might be the obvious player to step in, but throws cold water on the idea -- would it have enough money to bail all of the flailing PIIGS out? Would it provide the same sweetheart deals it did to Eastern European countries? Where would that leave the Eurozone?
I'm a bit more bullish on the prospect of the IMF stepping in with an emergency deal. But I think it is more likely the strongest of the big European economies, led by Germany, will eventually come around to coming together along with other partners to write a check and keep Greece afloat.
I think the about analysis does not paint the complete picture.
The principal difference between most PIIGS countries and US (or for other EU nations) is while the government is highly indebted, the population as large is not.
http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-SF-09-029/EN/KS-SF-09-029-EN.PDF
Compared to US, most EU nationals have much higher savings and less private debt. Also, I wounder if these numbers are only US federal gov. debt or do they also include state obligations? If not, they would make some difference to the actual picture.
Lastly, if one looks to future US "obligations" such as two ongoing wars and health-care reform, these costs are not yet completely accounted for and hence have the potential to further inflate the numbers. One need to looks at current budget projections for 2010-2012 and note that the debt will further dramatically rise.
The of this story is not only how bad the PIIGS countries are, but in fact unfortunately US is not far behind.
I think Greece should be expelled from Eurozone, so other countries will think twice before adopting Euro.
Passport, FP’s flagship blog, brings you news and hidden angles on the biggest stories of the day, as well as insights and under-the-radar gems from around the world.
Read More
(2)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE