Sunday, January 31, 2010 - 4:01 PM
I hadn't seen this earlier: John Pomfret relays word that Google's declaration that it would no longer comply with Chinese Internet censorship rules was a verboten subject in Davos this year.
"At China's request, that topic was left off the table at this year's World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Josef Ackermann, chief executive of Deutsche Bank and co-chairman of the event, told Bloomberg News," he writes.
So now China is capable of silencing debate in what's supposed to be an open forum?
Here's more from Bloomberg, which quotes Ackermann saying "China didn't want to discuss Google":
At Davos, participants such as financier George Soros, economist Joseph Stiglitz and French President Nicolas Sarkozy debated technology topics such as social networking and 3-D features used in the motion picture "Avatar." The discussion didn't include the conflict between China and Google, even in panels such as "The Rise of Asia" or "Redesigning the Global Dimensions of China's Growth."
Way to tackle the tough issues, guys.
Google CEO Eric Schmidt did briefly raise the subject on his own, however, according to the Wall Street Journal:
"We like what China is doing in terms of growth...we just don't like censorship," Mr. Schmidt said, speaking at the World Economic Forum's annual summit here. "We hope that will change and we can apply some pressure to make things better for the Chinese people." [...]
Mr. Schmidt maintained Friday that Google wants to continue operating in China. But he said the company didn't want to do so if it had to operate under China's censorship laws. To operate its Web site, Googe.cn in China, Google had to agree to censor its results.
"We would very much like to stay in China. We would very much like the censorship we oppose to improve in China," Mr. Schmidt replied.
Li Keqiang, China's vice premier, didn't address the issue in his speech, but apparently insisted in private that foreign companies must follow Chinese laws.
When a government damages a US corporation, the corporation can respond by having a court seize US assets of the offending government. In the present case, the PRC might return the favor by seizing US assets in China. What do you others think will happen if China again assaults Google?
after all, the US successfully brought suit against China for breaking bilateral trade agreements.
Link: http://unionreview.com/trade,-too-often,-victim-blamed
But censorship? Never happen. As I understand it, the revenues Google derives from it's operations in China are miniscule, and if Google wanted to get out of China, then that's far more likely. You want to do business in a country, then you play by their rules. Every nation insists on this to one degree or another.
Besides, we have our own censorship legislation pending here in the US:
Link: http://lynch.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2010/01/25/arabs_reject_us_crackdown_on_arab_satellite_tv
Passport, FP’s flagship blog, brings you news and hidden angles on the biggest stories of the day, as well as insights and under-the-radar gems from around the world.
Read More
(2)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE