President Obama recorded a video message today for the ceremony marking the 65th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz:
We have a sacred duty to remember the twisted thinking that led
here—how a great society of culture and science succumbed to the worst
instincts of man and rationalized mass murder and one of the most
barbaric acts in history.
We have a sacred duty to remember the cruelty that occurred here, as
told in the simple objects that speak to us even now. The suitcases
that still bear their names. The wooden clogs they wore. The round
bowls from which they ate. Those brick buildings from which there was
no escape—where so many Jews died with Sh’ma Israel on their lips. And
the very earth at Auschwitz, which is still hallowed by their
ashes—Jews and those who tried to save them, Polish and Hungarian,
French and Dutch, Roma and Russian, straight and gay, and so many
others.
But even as we recall man’s capacity for evil, Auschwitz also tells
another story—of man’s capacity for good. The small acts of
compassion—the sharing of some bread that kept a child alive. The
great acts of resistance that blew up the crematorium and tried to stop
the slaughter. The Polish Rescuers and those who earned their place
forever in the Righteous Among the Nations.
Obama's remarks were very well written, though the sentiment
suggested in them was hardly new. Each time a Holocaust anniversary
comes around, we hear the same speeches about how these camps stand as
a symbol of the human capacity of evil and the duty to prevent it, yet
nations are still just as slow to respond to modern-day cases of
genocide and atrocity or take steps needed to prevent them.
Writing for Foreign Policy in December, the International Crisis Group's Andrew Stroehlein, who was led international delegations to Auschwitz, suggested that using it as our model for genocide might be the problem:
There is probably no more appropriate single
location than Auschwitz-Birkenau for grasping the scope of the Nazi horror. But
the unprecedented and unequaled nature of that horror makes it somewhat inappropriate as
a useful lesson for preventing genocide today. When you're waiting for
something that looks like Birkenau, it's almost too easy to say, "never again."
From March 1942 to late 1944, Birkenau was the
largest factory of mass murder in wartime Europe. Every day, trains arrived
carrying thousands of people -- mostly Jews, but also Poles, Roma, and others
-- and apart from a limited number deemed fit for slave labor, they were sent
immediately to their deaths in massive, purpose-built gas chambers. At its
peak, Birkenau could kill as many as 20,000 people a day, and in the end, this
place was the worst of the extermination camps: The Nazis are estimated to have
murdered over a million people here.
It was the mechanization of murder on a scale
never before seen, and it stretched far beyond the grounds of this camp. With
victims shipped in from all across Europe, this was an integrated system of
collection, transport, and execution that covered a continent. It was precisely
that sort of industrialization that I feared might inhibit an understanding of
mass atrocity among the participants. Walking around Birkenau with these
diplomats, some of whom represent states on the edge -- a few perhaps even over the edge -- of mass atrocities
right now, I got the feeling some might have missed the point.
The Holocaust was a minutely organized and
completely structured -- not to mention disturbingly well-documented --
genocide, miles away from the messy realities of their countries. They could
look at the camp and the gas chambers and recognize nothing familiar. In fact,
the visit may have only confirmed their belief that their countries were
incapable of mass atrocities, when all they are really incapable of is the
industrialized method. [...]
This issue goes far beyond a couple dozen
participants in a seminar in Poland. I suspect too many people in the wider
international community still only recognize genocide in this one most specific
sense. They are always looking for Birkenau -- expecting industrialized killing
rather than seeing genocide the way it unfolds today. They ignore the evidence
that in the right environment, simple machetes can be just as effective as rail
networks and gas chambers.
The whole piece
is well worth reading. Particularly this week, it's useful to consider
whether when leaders say "never again," they mean "never again will
Germans kill Jews here" or something more universal.
Read More
(2)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE