Posted By Annie Lowrey Share

Yesterday, I wrote about the brief life and presumed death of Rep. David Obey's "war tax," also known as the "Share the Sacrifice Act of 2010." Obey and his cosponsors hoped to make the Afghan war pay-go from here on out, with an income tax surtax (one percent for most earners, and higher for high earners) linked to the cost of war. 

I liked the idea precisely because so much of this war (around 40 percent) thus far has been funded with deficit spending during very good economic times, from 2001 to 2006, when high-income Americans certainly could have afforded higher taxes (which were cut by George W. Bush).

Commenters here and elsewhere asked: Why raise taxes during a recession, when the government has been deficit-spending wildly to boost the economy? Tax dollars are tax dollars, not earmarked for one use or another. Raising taxes is raising taxes. Isn't this precisely the time we're supposed to deficit spending? 

Well, yes, but not all deficit dollars are created equal, I fear. If we spend an additional $60 billion on the Afghanistan war, it does do some good for the American economy. It goes to American companies to build things like planes and armor, to hiring new soldiers, to American contractors working in Afghanistan to build roads and schools. But, down the road, the United States doesn't get those roads and schools. Soldiers stop fighting in Afghanistan, but continue to collect salaries and benefits. This means the deficit dollar spent in Afghanistan isn't as effective as the deficit dollar spent in, say, Detroit.

For some data on this phenomenon, Dean Baker at the Center for Economic and Policy Research produced a paper showing that war spending (rather than domestic spending) ultimately costs jobs and GDP.

But all of this might be moot. It seems that Congress is considering extending the estate tax, which was due to expire for a year before coming back into force in 2011. The tax only hits estates worth more than $3.5 million. I say extend it, and expand it to include less, erm, ample estates as well. That seems even better than the Obey plan. 
 
Facebook|Twitter|Reddit

DELLIS

12:39 PM ET

December 2, 2009

Taxes

The question of raising federal revenue and the question of whether the Afghan war is worth continued federal expenditures are entirely different questions. If Lowrey's point is that the Afghan war should operate on pay-go principles, it would make more sense to cut wasteful special interest spending like farm subsidies. If Lowrey's point is that top marginal tax brackets for high calendar-year ordinary income American households are too low, then she should make this argument directly. I would argue that if we were to design a tax system from scratch, we would not bias so much towards taxing income, and we would tax consumption more (preferably via a VAT for efficiency purposes) so that we would not bias people away from declaring ordinary income, or working hard, investing in higher education, work vs. leisure, or ordinary vs. capital or dividend income.

It strikes me that the real point of the Obey amendment is to lessen support for the Afghan War. If this is Obey's true motivation, he should make this argument on the merits. This strikes me as analagous to those who wish to bring back the draft. They never make the case on the merits - i.e. the draft would create a better military than today's high morale all-volunteer force. Instead, this argument is almost always framed as a means towards creating a more isolationist foreign policy. But if this is the argument, proponents should make it directly, rather than relying on too-clever policy proposals that are pure pretext.

 

JACKIE

8:36 AM ET

December 4, 2009

brawbuy

http://www.brawbuy.com/
http://www.myjerseysky.com/
http://www.ghdprincess.com/
Mens Timberland Roll-Top Boots
$150.00 $84.00
Save: 44% off
Timberland Roll-Top Boots menWaterproof leather for comfort, durability and abrasion resistance; Direct-attach, seam-sealed, waterproof construction keep feet dry in any weather ; Padded collar for a comfortable fit around the ankle and help keep out debris ; When rolled down the leather lining is exposed ; Durable laces with Taslan? fibers and rustproof hardware for long-lasting wear ; Footbed and inside of shoe is completely lined with soft, breathable leather ; Non-marking, rubber lug outsole for traction and durability

 

Passport, FP’s flagship blog, brings you news and hidden angles on the biggest stories of the day, as well as insights and under-the-radar gems from around the world.

Read More