Monday, November 9, 2009 - 6:23 PM

A World Bank research paper posted today finds that countries with a high proportion of young males with low levels of secondary education are significantly more conflict-prone. The combination of these "youth bulges" and low rates of secondary education is especially likely to lead to conflict in low- and middle-income countries, the authors also report. The findings focus particularly on Sub-Saharan Africa, as "the continent with the largest youth cohorts and the lowest levels of male secondary education, scoring on average nearly 30 percentage points lower than the world average."
Countries outside of the region also call for concern. In Syria, for example, males 14 years old and younger make up nearly 20 percent of the population. Only 39.1 percent of secondary school-aged students are enrolled in school, making it the 101st lowest-ranking country of 135 surveyed. In the long run, Syria is facing declining oil production and rapid population growth - a recipe for violent unrest.
The policy implications are clear. Programs that focus on primary education, like the U.N.'s Education for All and Millennium Development Goals programs are important (after all, students have to read and write before they can pursue secondary schooling), but there must be more support for programs like the World Bank's own Secondary Education in Africa initiative.
The total cost of a secondary education in Kenya is estimated at $6,865. A 2007 Oxfam report found that on average a "war, civil war, or insurgency shrinks an African economy by 15 percent," and conflict causes the continent to lose about $18 billion a year. You do the math.
Photo: SONIA ROLLEY/AFP/Getty Images
That only will work up to a certain point. These wars are caused by far more than a simple lack of education, and among terrorists the majority seem to actually be rather well educated. I think increasing education across Africa and the world is a noble goal, but don't rest all hope on that alone.
Well this may hold true for wars between countries but terror insired war actually has a lot of highly educated people among them.
All wars have bright people at the top, that's not the issue. The implication is that young men in school, with a future, may be less willing to to risk their lives.
Wouldn't this study's results be skewed by European countries, where high lvls of education correlate with pacifism, but only because they fought the two most destructive wars in world history a few generations back (and at the time were the most highly-educated countries in the world)?
Once you take a step and widen the scope to include history, I suspect the findings would be invalidated.
Passport, FP’s flagship blog, brings you news and hidden angles on the biggest stories of the day, as well as insights and under-the-radar gems from around the world.
Read More
(5)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE