Is Obama passive-aggressive toward Turkey or just bad with dates?

Wed, 10/28/2009 - 1:57pm

Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan is currently in Tehran with his "friend," Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, as the two leaders discuss ways to bolster the bilateral ties between their two countries. While Turkey's realignment towards Iran and Syria is by now familiar, it is possible that the Obama administration might be more annoyed at this development than it has let on publicly.

Obama recently sent an invitation to Prime Minister Erdogan to meet with him in Washington D.C. on October 29. That just happens to be the Turkish equivalent of the Fourth of July -- the anniversary of the dissolution of the Ottoman Empire and the creation of the Turkish republic. Erdogan, placed in a bind over the need to be in Turkey on this national holiday, was forced to turn down Obama's invitation and reschedule, likely for a date in December.

This seems like a canny way for Obama to superficially appear to be continuing his philosophy of "engagement," while at the same time extending an invitation that he knew Erdogan would not be able to accept. And really, it's hard to believe that a prospective visit by the Turkish leader wasn't first cleared with a Turkey expert at the State Department, who could have pointed out the obvious conflict. 

However, it could just be that the administration is bad with dates. It wouldn't be the first time: remember, Obama announced the US decision to abandon its missile defense plans in Eastern Europe on the anniversary of the Soviet invasion of Poland.



Advertisement

 

No, they really are just

No, they really are just incompetent...

I earnestly hope it was a

I earnestly hope it was a deliberate decision despite the bad signals that sends. I really don't want to contemplate such an easily avoided mistake on the part of just about EVERYONE.

Turkey realigned?

Turkey has not realigned itself with Iran and Syria. It looks to me as though Erdogan is working towards warming ties with those two countries in hopes of further playing a role in peacemaking - perhaps mediating future agreements.
Turkey is both East and West and stands as the an ally of the US, several European countries, is a NATO member, and is now turning eastwards as it has seen its stocks rise when it was the go-between with Israel and Syria.
Ofcourse, Turkey has also taken the role of a moral leader under Erdogan, appealing to the Muslim street as much as he does the Muslim leaders around him by criticizing and publically reducing military cooperation with Israel in light of the Gaza War. Erdogan is being quite strategic, and to think that he has taken his country away from the West (Turkey is a democracy and the Turks see themselves as Western) is absurd.

I'm not quite sure what you

I'm not quite sure what you are writing in response to here.