Posted By Mardy Shualy Share

In a talk given this afternoon at the Miller Center of Public Affairs, retired Gen.  John Abizaid outlined his view of U.S. involvement in the Middle East. He argued that it is foolish to approach issues on a country-by-country basis, complaining that "we look at Iraq through a soda straw. We look at Afghanistan through a soda straw." Instead, says Abizaid, the United States must develop a regional strategy that accounts for the roles of Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Iran.

For the same reason, he suggested, the debate over whether or not to send more troops to Afghanistan has been over-simplified; the discussion should be broadened to include the relative demands of Iraq, Afghanistan and the region at large.

Abizaid also emphasized the ideological nature of the conflict, and the need for soft power to address the root causes of radicalism. He noted that Baitullah Mehsud, the top Taliban leader, is referred to as "the commander of the faithful."

"While we may chuckle at that title," Abizaid said, "the people fighting for him do not." When asked whether there should be a shift to a counter-terrorism approach in Afghanistan that relies more upon targeted strikes than nation-building, Abizaid responded that such a plan is impractical. Stabilization in Afghanistan and Iraq is a precondition for effective counter terrorist operations, he argued, because it provides the infrastructure needed to develop the "superb, superb intelligence" needed.

The theme of the talk was that instability anywhere in the region is a serious threat to surrounding countries. With our "ground forces spread thin" and "our 24-7 forces totally engaged," the United States must more fully incorporate diplomatic, political and economic plans to get a handle on the region. A number of questions were directed to the resources required for such a broad regional approach, and towards the end of the talk, the retired general was asked if the situation would be better in Afghanistan had the United States not invaded Iraq.

"All's I know is that we did what we did, and we are where we are," he answered.

 

CATHOLICGAUZE

5:27 PM ET

October 5, 2009

Really FP?

"Baitullah Mehsud, the top Taliban leader, is referred to as 'the commander of the faithful.'"

Really FP? Mehsud was the leader of the independent Pakistan branch of the Taliban (sort of the relationship between al Qaeda in Iraq and al Qaeda)... until he was killed. The overall leader of the Taliban has always been Mullah Muhammad Omar. Omar earned the title Commander of the Faithful by putting on the Cloak of Muhammad during the 1990s. I am unaware of any source that gives that rare title to Mehsud (the one article you linked to no where claims he has the Islamic title).

 

MARIK7

1:21 AM ET

October 6, 2009

We must stabilize BEFORE we

We must stabilize BEFORE we fight terrorism?

And why do we have difficulty stabilizing?

Terrorism.

Ah. I get it.

 

GRANT

8:54 AM ET

October 6, 2009

While the article is correct

While the article is correct on the point that a regional approach is more useful than a state-by-state approach, I have to wonder at the choice of a certain phrase "is referred to as "commander of the faithful".

The man has been dead for about two months now. That's a strange way to phrase it.

 

BOYY

5:29 AM ET

October 13, 2009

Everything is very open and

Everything is very open and very clear explanation of issues. was truly information. abercrombie fitch Men vintage sweater

 

Passport, FP’s flagship blog, brings you news and hidden angles on the biggest stories of the day, as well as insights and under-the-radar gems from around the world.

Read More