Petraeus makes the case for war... to Britain

Fri, 09/18/2009 - 2:21pm

CentCom commander Gen. David Petraeus writes in the (London) Times to make the case for a population-centric counterinsurgency strategy in Afghanistan and praise U.S.-British cooperation:

[W]e need to be realistic in recognising that the campaign will require a sustained, substantial commitment. Many tough tasks loom before us — including resolution of the way ahead after the recent election, which obviously has been marred by allegations of fraud. The challenges in Afghanistan clearly are significant. But the stakes are high. And, while the situation unquestionably is, as General McChrystal has observed, serious, the mission is, as he has affirmed, still doable. In truth, it is, I think, accurate to observe that, as in Iraq in 2007, everything in Afghanistan is hard, and it is hard all the time.

Iran constitutes the main state-based threat to stability in the region. The impact of its malign activities and harsh rhetoric are felt throughout the Arabian Peninsula, making it, ironically, the best recruiter with prospective partners. We now have eight Patriot missile batteries spread across countries on the western side of the Gulf, where two years ago we had far, far fewer.

If Cecil Rhodes was correct in his wonderful observation that “being an Englishman is the greatest prize in the lottery of life”, and I’m inclined to think that he was, then the second greatest prize in the lottery of life must be to be a friend of an Englishman, and based on that, the more than 230,000 men and women in uniform who work with your country’s finest day by day are very lucky indeed, as am I.

Petraeus also gave an address at London's Policy Exchange think tank, saying, "The challenges in Afghanistan are significant, but the stakes are also high, and while the situation unquestionably is serious, the mission is still do-able." (See the AfPak Channel for more.)

Sending Petraeus to rally British support makes sense, but it makes me wonder why the Obama adminsitration hasn't used Petraeus -- certainly the most well-known military officer in the country and a bona fide pop-culture icon -- to pitch the Afghanistan strategy to the U.S. public.

The media-savvy general seemed to be everywhere during the later Bush years defending the Iraq surge. But Petraeus has been out of the spotlight lately and the job of "selling" Afghanistan seems to have been left to Defense Secretary Robert Gates, Joint Chiefs Chairman Mike Mullen and the previously unknown Stan McChrystal. With the Pentagon worried about declining public support for the war, it seems odd that they haven't pulled out the big guns, so to speak. 

CRIS BOURONCLE/AFP/Getty Images



Advertisement

 

Simple answer

Why would Obama give that kind of a platform to his most credible rival (God help us) for 2012?

Ironically, that may be one of the reasons Obama chose to keep him on at CENTCOM. Not unlike FDR keeping MacArthur in the Pacific during WWII.

Granted this is entirely speculative. Pressed on the matter last year, all Petraeus would offer up were the usual "no intention to run" non-answer answers. Now Bob Dole's talking him up as (God help us) "a latter-day Ike."

car salesmen and media relations

a few maybes

maybe there is a fear that the Iraq "sales job" done so well in 2007 would be refought in a subsequent media blitz. ie adding Five BDEs for iraq = better security, but few larger political achievements was good enough for the Bush admin and a weak congress...maybe Obama is looking at something more for AfPak.

maybe there is no good answer to Afghanistan and ol' Dave doesn't see that putting his star power to help sell the best of several bad options is such a good idea for his future plans.

maybe Obama admin has put him on the shelf in an effort by civilians at NSC, DoD and State to retake control over US foreign policy and it's media relations. You notice Stan McCrystal hasn't shown up on a Sunday talk show lately either and you only see CJSC Mullin on the media circuit.

Why?

1. Iraq bad, AfPak good
2. Petraeus = Iraq
3. ergo, Petraeus bad

Sarcasm, right Don?

Sarcasm, right Don?

Somewhat

Petraeus is associated with Iraq and the administration wants the focus off Iraq and on AfPak. They don't need to enlarge the myth of the surge's success and talk about its applicability to AfPak. There are other factors, too, like the fact that it's nearly eight thousand miles from Tampa to Kabul, which puts Petraeus a bit out of touch. So they'll keep him in low profile.

General Petraeus hasn't exactly been silent on Afghanistan in the US. He gave a speech to the American Legion in Louisville, Ky., on August 25th.

“Despite important achievements in various areas, given the deterioration in the security situation, an enormous amount of hard work and tough fighting lie ahead in Afghanistan,” Petraeus said in his prepared remarks.

Nearly eight years into the war in Afghanistan, Petraeus said the primary objective remains clear: to ensure that transnational extremists such as al-Qaida are not able to re-establish the sanctuaries they had prior to the 9/11 attacks. But more than just killing or capturing terrorists and extremists, he added, the mission requires a counterinsurgency campaign akin to the strategy he oversaw as the top U.S. commander in Iraq -- an effort that placed greater focus on securing the population.
http://www.centcom.mil/en/news/petraeus-tough-fighting-ahead-in-afghanistan.html

General BetrayUs?

If Cecil Rhodes was correct in his wonderful observation that “being an Englishman is the greatest prize in the lottery of life”, and I’m inclined to think that he was....

Well, if the good General ever intended to seek the Republican nomination, he has just written himself off in the eyes of the sizable "America First" crowd. To these nativists, the above comment is heretical and unpatriotic.

It is probably cold comfort to these folks that the good General hasn't (yet) proposed funding the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq by raising taxes on the wealthy. Now, IMHO, making THAT case would be a wonderful use of Petraeus by the Obama administration.