Thursday, August 27, 2009 - 4:36 PM
Although the situation got little coverage in the United States, Kennedy, who had a lifelong interest in refugee issues and was eyeing a run against Nixon, traveled to inspect the situation:
On his return, he issued a scathing report to the Senate Judiciary Committee on Refugees. The report, "Crisis in South Asia," spoke of "one of the most appalling tides of human misery in modern times."
"Nothing is more clear, or more easily documented, than the systematic campaign of terror -- and its genocidal consequences -- launched by the Pakistani army on the night of March 25th," he wrote.
"All of this has been officially sanctioned, ordered and implemented under martial law from Islamabad. America's heavy support of Islamabad is nothing short of complicity in the human and political tragedy of East Bengal."
The Nixon administration maintained its stance. But Kennedy's focus on the mass killings came as everyday Americans began to share in the outrage. For instance, Beatle George Harrison's Concert for Bangladesh, the first benefit event of its kind, was staged to further highlight the plight of Bangladeshi refugees.
Besieged, the U.S. Congress pushed through a bill to ban arms sales to Pakistan.
Kennedy received a hero's welcome in Dhaka in 1972, just after Bangladesh gained independence. Yesterday, Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina recalled Kennedy's role, saying, "The people of Bangladesh will remember his contribution forever."
"Rezwan" of Global Voices has a great roundup of Bangladeshi blogger reactions to Kennedy's death, including "Unheard Voice," which posts Kennedy's original report to Congress.
Yesterday's New York Times obit of Kennedy devoted one paragraph to his international contributions, saying he "had less impact on foreign policy than on domestic concerns." That's probably true. But considering the impact Kennedy had in Chile, Bangladesh, South Africa, and Northern Ireland as well as the not-insignificant role he played in the debates over Vietnam and Iraq, this says more about the size of his overall legacy than anything else.
Photo: Ted Kennedy in Dhaka in 1972. From Flickr user faria!
I suppose Bangladeshi independence was more important to him than South Vietnamese independence.
Brett...are you saying creation of Bangladesh was less than Vietnam in some way?
Not at all. But he openly supported the Bangladeshi movement on human rights concerns - yet apparently couldn't be bothered to support the South Vietnamese in avoiding ending up under Communist control.
Was this before or after Teddy walked on water (as he left the slightly submerged Oldsmobile)? Presumably, before he had his marriage to Joan annulled so he could marry a sweet young thang, too. (Of course, that meant the children he had by Joan became bastards in the eyes of Rome.) Such a wonderful man. How I long for the day when the Kennedys will be collectively expunged from our national landscape; the media's blinders-on worship got nauseating years ago, and it's getting unbearable now.
Per the piece, well said. And I hope FP will take the lead real soon, and give a more just article focused exclusively on his IR initiatives and endeavors, both successes and shortcomings.
Per the comments, pathetic. Don't blame Teddy for Vietnem; LBJ, the military establishment and the intelligence community did enough damage through their incompetence and ignorance towards that feat, that by 1969, even when Nixon did some sensible things, it was too little, too late. Plus, thanks to the expanded draft, the middle class was over the war anyways, so be mindful of your critique. And to the personal tragedies, President G. W. Bush was a pretty flawless guy for the last 20 years. Never drank. Never smoked. Loved his wife. And was an embarrassment to executives everywhere, at all levels. So take it down, you herb!
Passport, FP’s flagship blog, brings you news and hidden angles on the biggest stories of the day, as well as insights and under-the-radar gems from around the world.
Read More
(5)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE