The Game hits back at Abu Aardvark!

Fri, 08/07/2009 - 12:38pm

FP's own Marc Lynch got a ton of attention (and rightly so!) in the blogosphere and the MSM for his brilliant post on what the beef between Jay-Z and The Game can teach us about American hegemony. It was only a matter of time before the participants themselves weighed in. (This is The Game we're talking about.)

A reporter in New Zealand asked the L.A. rapper, currently on tour, to respond to Marc's post: 

In a recent Foreign Policy article, George Washington University Professor Marc Lynch, likened the feud to the battle of global hegemony -- with Jay Z in the role of the United States, and The Game as the "erratic wildcard": Iran and North Korea.

The Game asks for an explanation of why that's not a favourable comparison, before likening Lynch to Greenland -- isolated from the top writers in the world -- and Jay Z to Iceland "coz he's gone cold".

The Game should be wary. Marc's got a lot of friends in the D.C. foreign-policy blogosphere and they don't play. Matt Yglesias and Spencer Ackerman have already weighed in. Here's Ackerman:

The Game is treating a reconcilable as an irreconcilable. He's like Abu Musab al-Zarqawi! Marc Lynch is a middle-class, fence-sitting Sunni Iraqi -- surely an academic -- in Diyala or Anbar or Baghdad, judiciously able to see both sides of the U.S. and AQI feud and not particularly inclined to throw his lot in decisively with one or the other. And here's The Game, trying to humiliate Marc in public for apostasy or cut his fingers off because he enjoys a cigarette. Defeat sets in right there. Soon will begin Marc Lynch's Awakening. Which is a good name for a mixtape. 

Like I said, Abu Aardvark rolls deep.

Lefty Shivambu/Gallo Images/Getty Images

( filed under: )


Advertisement

 

Holy cow, I'm white and nerdy

The Game asks for an explanation of why that's not a favourable comparison

There's your problem right there.

All kidding aside, this is essentially a "jocks vs. nerds" debate. The "nerds", aka the FP experts, can talk and analyze all they want. The "jocks", aka the players invovled in hip hop, will just ignore it, as well as any other larger issues involved. You might as well be talking to a wall, because nothing will penetrate.

Raping Rap

I don't get why white nerds feel such a proclivity to overanalogize and overanalyze rap music.

The Lynch article used too many words to make a point. I felt Lynch was trying too hard, like Vanilla Ice[land]. Since the 90s, academics have struggled to get out of the confines of academia. They want to become public intellectuals or pop phenomena. But the problem is that most of the world could care less about what a pasty white guy has to say about two black rappers. It's not like TMZ is going to be waiting outside Lynch's office during office hours, looking for his response to The Game's non-response.

Anyway, I am a sociologist by training and presently doing a study on the affinity of upper-middle class Jewish males under 40 for rap music. I think I will interview Spencer Ackerman, another poseur.

A "pasty white guy" using too

A "pasty white guy" using too many (big?) words. So lame, ain't even on TMZ! Glad I'M no poseur.

Few things are more

Few things are more ridiculous than obviously white people writing about hip-hop. (I'm reminded of a Rolling Stone feature a few years back that used then-semi-current hip-hop jargon to explain the then-current hip-hop landscape to the magazine's predominantly white, middle-aged readership. Hilariously stupid.) Adopting bits of urban black lingo only worsens the effect. This looks like apt fodder for Stuff White People Like. Please refrain from dragging hip-hop into any further analogies about world events. I'm guessing the conjunction between hip-hop fans and FP blog readers is pretty small (much as, say, death metal listeners and FP blog readers would be -- and an analogy dragging Cradle of Filth songs into foreign events analysis would be just as silly).

Got it

Only John Mayer analogies from now on

White and Loving It

There's nothing strange or unusual at all about white people commenting on black culture, or any other non-white culture; white people have been analyzing and commenting on non-white cultures for centuries. Just because the subject of the analysis is recent in occurence, as opposed to in the 1800's, does not make that white person any less capable of drawing conclusions.

I think a lot of people misinterpret what's been written. I agree with Lynch, and have thought so for a while, that nation-states, NGOs, transnational terrorist groups, et cetera do not act as rational entities; they act as individuals, with competing, irrational motivations, like jealousy, hatred, and fear. Analyses of national-level actors through the prism of individual human behavior is in my opionion an intelligent methodology, and one which should yield new insight. As Jay-Z would say, "Sensitive thugs/ You all need hugs." Big ups to the 609 and 504.

play games for free and take

play games for free and take it easy

free online games