Posted By Blake Hounshell Share

After a very exciting week, it appears increasingly likely that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad will once again be Iran's president. 

Ayatollah Ali Khamenei apparently just pronounced the election results -- deemed suspect by Iran analysts -- a "divine assessment." And his word is final.

Mir Hossain Mousavi, the challenger, has been unyielding in declaring the official results a farce. He insists he's the winner. "I'm warning I will not surrender to this dangerous charade. The result of such performance by some officials will jeopardize the pillars of the Islamic Republic and will establish tyranny," he said, in a statement cited by Reuters.

But just a few thousand of Mousavi's supporters defied government orders and protested in Tehran Saturday. Security forces sent them packing and threatened arrests. Meanwhile, Mousavi's press conference was mysteriously canceled, and there are unconfirmed reports that he was told in no uncertain terms to concede defeat.

And here's where "anyone but Ahmadinejad" probably isn't enough. People may be willing to form a human chain in the streets and wear green when such activities are sanctioned by the regime in the context of an election campaign. But are any but Mousavi's most ardent supporters willing to risk arrest, or even death, to see him elected? I tend to doubt it. The man just isn't that inspiring.

This is Iran, of course, and therefore anything could happen. According to some reports, Mousavi has called on his supporters to rally Saturday evening. But my gut tells me that it's game over.

As Rand's Alireza Nader put it, "The power of the traditional ruling elite -- men such as Ayatollah Rafsanjani -- has been effectively challenged by Ahmadinejad and his supporters, including top-ranking and fundamentalist members of the Revolutionary Guards."

This was hardball, and Ahmadinejad and Khamenei [appear to have] won.

As for the Obama administration's efforts to engage Iran, this is a huge setback. Because now, the U.S. will be dealing with a government that just stole an election, and used violence and threats of violence to enforce the results it wanted. Or, if the opposition does mobilize, there could be months of paralysis while the nuclear clock keeps ticking.

UPDATE: Several Iran hands emailed to say that I'm calling this way too early. As one of them put it, "Remember we haven't heard [from] Rafsanjani at all yet, or Khatami."

Of course, I'm not 100 percent sure that it's over. But the early signs don't look good for the Mousavi camp. Why weren't they able to put more people into the streets?

 
Facebook|Twitter|Reddit

KENNETH SORENSEN

10:24 AM ET

June 13, 2009

O, the nuclear clock keeps ticking, does it?

Are you sure it's not an atom clock? You must have been naive to pin your hopes in this way on a particular election. Iran is a sovereign country consisting of 70 million people. It is the dominant country in the ME, - Israel is a new creation and only consist of a littele more than 5 million Jews. Who has to give? It is obvious, and you as a writer on a main US foreign policy publication should be the first to know. And to speak out the thruth before anyone else, instead of just following prevailing winds. I will look into if you an Mr. Keating supported the Iraq war as well, because this lame kow-towing to prevailing winds in Washington and to put this emphacy on Israeli concerns is so out of touch of what the American people and the pooples of the world think about this matter.

 

BLUE13326

10:29 PM ET

June 13, 2009

What a dreadful post; you

What a dreadful post; you really got this one wrong; hopefully, you're rightfully ashamed for your piss-poor work. There are videos on the internet now of demonstrations in Iran with tens of thousands of people.

It may all amount to nothing, but to say as of this morning that it's all over was very stupid.

 

Passport, FP’s flagship blog, brings you news and hidden angles on the biggest stories of the day, as well as insights and under-the-radar gems from around the world.

Read More