The pope's photo-op with Europe's last dictator

Tue, 04/28/2009 - 2:08pm


Belarussian President Aleksandr Lukashenko's PR machine kicked into overdrive yesterday during a meeting with Pope Benedict. RFE/RL's Luke Allnut notes that the Belarussian strongman's adorable son Nikola stole the show at the event: "Resplendent in a white cardigan among the papal grays and purples... playing with a football and presenting the pope with his ABC's book." It certainly sounds like Lukashenko is getting his money's worth from his top-shelf British spin-doctors.

Belarussian opposition leader Anatoly Lebedko put the meeting in context for the AP:

"Lukashenko's main goal is to improve his image and to receive absolution from the pope ahead of the EU summit in Prague, where many European politicians will not extend a hand to the Belarusian dictator," he said.

On this site last week, David Kramer and Irina Krasovskaya (whose husband was "disappeared" by the Lukashenko regime) argued that the E.U.'s efforts to reach out to Belarus were ill-advised and would only lead Lukashenko to crack down more on political dissent. 

Most E.U. leaders, at least, seem fairly embarassed by the prospect of standing next to Lukashenko. Some even say they won't shake his hand. Even Silvio Berlusconi, who became the first Western European leader in 14 years to meet with him yesterday, didn't hold a press conference and made it clear that he would press Lukashenko on human rights. On the other hand, the Vatican said only that some "internal problems" were discussed at the Pope's meeting but in a "positive climate"

What is Benedict thinking? There are certainly times when talking with human rights abusers can be productive. But the Pope isn't a realist, nor should he be. Unlike national leaders he's in a position to act as a voice of conscience without worrying about political expediency. 

Considering the bad press he's gotten over the last few months, it couldn't have hurt the pope to say a few words in public about Lukashenko's stiffling of free speech and dissent in Belarus. Instead, he gave the dictator a photo-op to die for without a critical word. 

Given the role his predecessor played in dispatching authoritarian governments from the rest of Eastern Europe, Benedict's conduct was especially shameful. 

CHRIS HELGREN/AFP/Getty Images

( filed under: )


Advertisement

 

Whoa, wait just a minute there Mr. High and Mighty

Disagreeing with a leader (political or religious) is your right and you may voice your opinion insofar as this is a blog and not a pure journalism.

However, calling the actions of a religious leader (of over 1 Billion adherents worldwide) "shameful" because they do not match up with his predecessor's political actions or your political theory is particularly upsetting.

I recommend you keep to the journalism and dispense less with the opinion. I refer especially to your last and antepenultimate paragraphs.

nothing theoretical about monsters

the pope is just trying to ring up numbers for the home team...he would probably support Hitler if Adolf opposed abortions and gay marriage...I would like to revive my Catholicism but not in this century

Catholics need an intellectual bail-out strategy...and Belarus needs a revolution

It's a blog, Teodoro, and

It's a blog, Teodoro, and they can say whatever the hell they like, much as you have.

I agree that this visit by the pope has done only harm.

Equal treatment?

@Teodoro

You appear to want equal treatment of political and religious leaders. Then why claim to be so upset when a decision made by the Pope is labeled "shameful"? I would not be upset to see a number of G.W. Bush's (300mil 'adherents') actions that disagreed with his predecessor to be described as shameful.

Or do you want religious leaders to be treated differently?

rememember the other 911?

Sure - pick on the pope. Then again, that's all Western Intellectual have been picking on since - oh say- Rousseau.

Picking on nutty-Jihadi clerics, like say the head of Saudi Wahabia, or Egypts Al-Ansar university - now that's off limits!

It's primitive, when you get to the gist. Say what you want about Lukashenko - he's not had any death-squads out there.

Let's recall a famous date 9-11. The one in 1968, in which Pinochet took power.

Google Pinochet and the pope, and see what you get.

Does that say much about hypocrisy? Oh, and don't forget that plea he made for the Generalisimo - in 1999.

Then of course, when it came time to try the thug - it was Kissinger and Albright, pulling all the strings to make sure the House of Lords would not allow his extradition. His insanity, mind you - was sheer pretense.

to engage or admonish?

Admonishing Lukashenko clearly has no impact (and it won't) and it's highly likely that engaging with him will have pretty much the same effect. An intervention? Lets not even go there.

The human rights conundrum: one must do something, but nothing that you can do will work. In the meantime, tell the stories, and both admonish and engage simultaneously.

Tell the stories! I read a lot, but I know only vaguely of the Lukashenko regime's sins. Put a face on them.