Wednesday, April 15, 2009 - 3:35 PM
Everyone has an idea about how to go after the pirate avengers on the coast of Somalia these days, but the most unusual by far comes from Texas representative and former presidential candidate Ron Paul.
Fearing that the incidents will expand the militarization of the region and lead to increases in U.S. military spending, Paul, unsurprisingly, wants to privatize the fight.
It's the ships themselves who choose to go into those dangerous waters; why not let them take on the cost of providing security? Let them carry guns and fight back. The U.S. government for its part, Paul suggests, would "arm" the private ships with a different kind of ammunition in the form of Letters of Marque and Reprisal.
The long-dead U.S. foreign policy tool, allows the government to write letters granting private citizens the authority to go after fugitives or others who do them offense. If applicable, the citizens could then collect government-issued bounty for their good work. In short, the letters would put the fight on piracy in the hands of the people. Or sailors.
Paul's idea is not new. In addition to the founding fathers' use against piracy centuries ago, the congressman suggested the Letters of Marque and Reprisal be used as a means to counter terrorism after 9-11 -- allowing private citizens to "hunt down" terrorists on their own.
Inviting people to play Pirates of the Caribbean is gonna get messy. Although then again, maybe it's not any less organized than what is happening now?
I have an ancestor who was a privateer out of Hampton Roads Virginia during the Revolutionary War and War of 1812. In between the two wars, the French continued to fight the British, and the South wanted to join France, although Washington and Adams enforced neutrality. Enterprising privateers , like my ancestor, partnered with French citizens, receiving letters of marque from France, through one of its colonies in the Caribbean, and thus ran a lucrative business preying on merchant shipping of the British and their allies.
What is proposed now is not so much letters of marque, legal piracy of enemy shipping, but basic self-defense, going armed and ready to fend off pirates, if the need arises. I don't think a ship and its crew need a letter of marque to shoot pirates who seek to board or capture, but giving them a legal basis for monetary reward for capturing a pirate ship would certainly add an incentive.
For those who've read O'Brian's Master & Commander series of historical novels, based largely on first hand accounts of actions at sea during the time my ancestor plied his trade in the Atlantic, Ron Paul's basic premise is that, when a pirate ship appears on the horizon, every crew member starts assessing its worth, and calculating, like a bunch of Wall Street traders, how much the ship would bring at auction, and their share in the haul, if they can just capture those who would capture them. Elaborate percentage sharing arrangements, to rival Wall Street bonuses, stirred the hearts of the mateys then, and it could happen again. But real fighting men, like those Seals who took out the pirate trio recently, are generally worth a lot more than your average seaman in a fight.
I think commercial shipping should be incentivized to shoot and kill pirates, but that the Navy should also plan to be on the spot when the need arises. The USS Bainbridge memorializes a Jefferson administration admiral who fought pirates in the Mediterranean to facilitate American and European shipping. We're all better off with free trade, and pirates can only thrive when they get away with what they do.
Probaly need to start using the old rules where pirates are tried and if found guily are hanged. Would make some think twice before doing it. Even though we don't use it anymore the is still a law on the books in Texas where the penalty for a horse thief is still hanging.
Seriously, This guy was a presidential candidate????
Okay, I know a lot of you think that this is a fantastic idea. In theory it probably is a great idea. If private vessels were allowed to mount a 50 caliber or MK-19 grenade launcher, I'm guessing the pirate problem would go away. There a major problem, though, most foreign ports (and all domestic ports) do not allowed merchant ships to carry arms. To put it more simply, it's illegal!!! Ron Paul should know this!! Unbelievable . . . Looks like we dodged a real bullet with this guy!!
Passport, FP’s flagship blog, brings you news and hidden angles on the biggest stories of the day, as well as insights and under-the-radar gems from around the world.
Read More
(3)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE