Tuesday, April 14, 2009 - 10:39 AM
Scott Horton reports that Spanish prosecutors will indict high-ranking members of the Bush administration over allegations of detainee abuse and torture.
The six are: former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales; former head of the Office of Legal Counsel Jay Bybee; former OLC lawyer John Yoo; former Defense Department lawyer William J. Haynes II; David Addington, a former adviser to Vice President Dick Cheney; and former Undersecretary of Defense Doug Feith.
Horton explains the context of the case:
The case arises in the context of a pending proceeding before the court involving terrorism charges against five Spaniards formerly held at Guantánamo. A group of human-rights lawyers originally filed a criminal complaint asking the court to look at the possibility of charges against the six American lawyers. Baltasar Garzón Real, the investigating judge, accepted the complaint and referred it to Spanish prosecutors for a view as to whether they would accept the case and press it forward. [They found sufficient evidence.]
The case won't come before Judge Real, though; he also was involved in a terrorism case against the five Spaniards held in Guantanamo.
What does it all mean?
Well, John Yoo won't be vacationing on the Costa del Sol this summer. Were any of the Bush Six to step foot in Spain, they would be arrested.
More importantly: Spain has said that it would drop the cases if the United States would investigate the claim. Thus far, the U.S. Department of Justice and the White House haven't responded. But the indictment may force the administration's hand, spurring a response to the allegations.
For, ultimately, the issue may have more political potency than judicial importance. It's up to U.S. President Barack Obama to dictate whether and how the strong allegations of legal abuses in the Bush administration will be resolved.
EXPLORE:EUROPE, BUSH ADMINISTRATION, BUSH'S LEGACY, DRUGS & CRIME, HUMAN RIGHTS, INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS, JUSTICE, LAW, SPAIN, U.S. FOREIGN POLICY
Spain to indict the "Bush Six" over torture
I believe Judge Garzon's warrant against Augusto Pinochet was accepted as valid in the UK. This would mean all of the "Bush 6" risk arrest in every EU member's territorial jurisdiction for this warrant.
Set this precedent, Annie, and I guarantee that the ne*t time the Repulicans come into power, it will be time for revenge. This is not a cycle it would be wise to start, and I think Obama is probably smart enough to realise that and forgoe the satisfaction.
There is no surer way to have Americans become suspicious of international actors than to have a non-American judge, operating in a non-American political system issuing warrants beyond their borders. There is also an enormous hypocrisy here, seeing as how Morocco is just across the water, has a poor reputation for treating political prisoners, and yet has never been the object of Judge Real's gavel. And that is because such an action would actually impinge on Spanish foreign policy. OTOH, the Spanish gov't is reasonably certain that an American gov't will not enact any diplomatic penalties in this case. Spain is behaving like a teenager - believing that its notions of right and wrong should be enforced - just don't ask for them to pick up a weapon and offer men for an international police force.
we can't take scrutiny so to the hell with human decency
this is what your line of reasoning would mean.
I disagree that it is up to President Obama to pursue criminal charges against his predecessor's administration. Decisions to prosecute should not be political at all. It is up to the DOJ, its career prosecutors, and their grand juries to determine whether crimes were committed and to prosecute where appropriate. My hope is that such investigations are proceeding, in secrecy, but that Obama and his politically appointed Eric Holder, will stay out of it.
they should go to jail for illegaly creating words
they encouraged criminal behavior. if this is a nation of laws they must be tried here!!!
In both the Pinochet case and in this case, Spanish courts have only moved where Spanish citizens were the alleged victims. This is a much more restricted level of extra-territorial action than claimed by United State courts. The case of the NatWest bankers who were charged in the United State with defrauding their employer on the basis of a tenuous link to Enron springs to mind. Both alleged perpetrators and victims were UK entities and the "victim" had and has never made any complaint.
Passport, FP’s flagship blog, brings you news and hidden angles on the biggest stories of the day, as well as insights and under-the-radar gems from around the world.
Read More
(8)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE