A sneak peek at Obama's Af-Pak strategy

Posted By Annie Lowrey Thursday, March 26, 2009 - 5:27 PM Share

Over at The Atlantic, Marc Ambinder offers a peek into President Barack Obama's Afghanistan-Pakistan strategy -- to be unveiled tomorrow. Among the highlights:

Obama plans to endorse a bill by Senate Foreign Relations Committee chairs Kerry and Lugar that would "emphasize results-driven cooperation with both countries" and "condition a significant increase in aid to Pakistan on measurable improvements in Pakistan's internal efforts to combat terrorism."

The new policy apparently does not "express a preference for specific leaders"; in contrast, the Bush administration favored Afghan President Hamid Karzai and former Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf, at "the expense of rooting out corruption and terrorism." He notes: "The U.S. hasn't found a candidate it likes."

The plan explains how Obama intends to use the 17,000 additional troops he's sending to Afghanistan: "4,000 will be tasked with training Afghan soldiers and the national police; the administration hopes to have more than 130,000 soldiers and 82,000 police officers trained by 2011. The rest of the troops will be given expanded counter-terrorism assignments and charged with defeating Al Qaeda, not just killing them in isolation."

It also deals with Iran. Obama will "ask neighboring nations to form a working group to handle disputes and plan longer-term initiatives," Ambinder writes.

Photo: MASSOUD HOSSAINI/AFP/Getty Images

EXPLORE:CENTRAL ASIA, SOUTH ASIA, AFGHANISTAN, MILITARY, OBAMA ADMINISTRATION, PAKISTAN

(2)

HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE

LEONARD

9:17 PM ET

March 26, 2009

Pet peeve...

The correct phrase is "sneak peek," as in "a brief and furtive/secretive look." A peak is the top of something, like a mountain for instance. This grammatical error is shamefully common among mainstream media outlets, for reasons I will never understand.

LEONARD

6:47 PM ET

March 27, 2009

peak vs. peek

ATTN Moderator:

I note that you chose not to correct the usage error (which any elementary school grammar teacher would have marked as incorrect). Shame on you -- AND your editors. I don't care if you publish this comment or not, but fix the friggin' error! Don't you people have any standards?

Passport, FP’s flagship blog, brings you news and hidden angles on the biggest stories of the day, as well as insights and under-the-radar gems from around the world.