Global News : Passport : Ricks : Drezner : Walt : Rothkopf : Lynch
The Cable : The AfPak Blog : Net Effect : Shadow Govt. : Madam Secretary : The Call
Did the U.S. engineer an African military operation?

Yet, just when this military venture was about to fizzle out with its primary objective still not met, an interesting piece of news, courtesy of the New York Times, has now thrown the operation back into the spotlight. On Feb. 7, the Times reported that the United States, through the Pentagon's newly minted Africa Command (or Africom), was heavily involved in the planning of the operation -- supplying intelligence, supplies, and more than a million dollars in fuel aid. According to the Times:
The Ugandan government asked the American Embassy in Kampala, Uganda's capital, for help, and the request was sent up the chain of command in November to President Bush, who personally authorized it, a former senior Bush administration official said."
Given the number of civilian massacres that have occurred since the start of the operation -- massacres that happened because no one adequately secured the villages in the area -- this could potentially be embarrassing for Africom and the Pentagon.
I asked Vince Crawley, chief of public information at Africom, to comment on the claims made by the New York Times. He responded by emphasizing that the United States was involved only in an advisory capacity and that "this wasn't a U.S. plan that Uganda carried out. It was a Ugandan plan that would have taken place regardless of U.S. assistance." With regard to the securing of villages in the area, Crawley said,
There was dialogue on how to protect the areas. There was discussion. Again, it's not a U.S. operation. ... Fundamentally, it's not appropriate for us to comment on the strategies and tactics of other nations. That's not what partners do."
Even with U.S. help, the LRA won't be easy to stamp out. Check out our new list of five other rebel groups around the world that have demonstrated remarkable staying power.
TONY KARUMBA/AFP/Getty Images













in case your question was a serious one
you'll have to dig a little deeper than a public affairs operative from the combatant command in question...
perhaps one could start w/ the following article, Make peace now or face the gun, US tells Kony, published in the east african on 12 september 2007
Did the US engineer an African Military operation
Vince Crawley described the relationship between the Uganda Gov and the American Gov as that of partners: <> Nonsense!
Apparently it was appropriate for the US Gov to support the Ugandan Gov with<> Anyone with any kind of knowlege of this region could have predicted the outcome of this venture: mass slaughter of innocent people! Anyone who has followed the UPDF/NRA's escapades over the past 23 years in Rwanda, DRC, Sudan, and especially northern Uganda and has a basic level of arithmetic such that they can add the millions of people who have been grotesquely slaughtered in atrocity and mass murder and rape, would have predicted the outcome of this operation.
This operation could not have taken place without the help of the US Government under George Bush. And to think that these wretched plans were being hatched while the Ugandan Government was supposed to be so committed to the peace talks! Innocent human lives mean nothing to Museveni and his "revolutionaries".
It is high time that the US Government rethought their policies with regards to the support they have given such a brutal and corrupt dictator, Yoweri Kaguta Museveni