Global News : Passport : Ricks : Drezner : Walt : Rothkopf : Lynch
The Cable : The AfPak Blog : Net Effect : Shadow Govt. : Madam Secretary : The Call
Freedom House: World less free, Iraq and South Asia improve

Freedom House has just released its annual Freedom in the World report on global political rights and civil liberties. Overall, the report shows global freedom in decline, a continuation of a trend over the last three years.
Last week, I spoke with Freedom House's director of research, Arch Puddington, about some of the report's more significant findings. Among these was a general improvement in the state of democracy in South Asia in 2008, a rare bit of good news for the increasingly unstable region.
South Asia is a volatile region. Last year one of our headlines was, "South Asia shows major decline." But you had some progress in Bangladesh, in Pakistan and some small countries like Bhutan, Nepal and the Maldives. They did show progress... I think that having India as the most powerful country in the region has a powerful ripple effect. India, despite its ethnic divisions and problems with terrorism and poverty does maintain a pretty stable democracy, which has rubbed off on its neighbors.
This year's report is also an opportunity to reflect on the effectiveness of outgoing President George W. Bush's famous "freedom agenda."
If you look at just our findings, there was a modest improvement over the eight years of the Bush administration. There was modest improvement in the Middle East. There was modest improvement in sub-Saharan Africa. The only region that showed decline throughout that period is the former Soviet Union.
So we certainly would not conclude, as some have, that the Bush administration was a catastrophe for the state of world freedom. There was some gain. Most of that gain came during the first four years and the decline came after the color revolutions and the backlash in the Middle East and you saw some of the gains eroded.
Also relevant to the discussion of Bush's legacy is the the only country in the Middle East that improved this year: Iraq.
The diminution of violence and expecially the decline in influcence of the Shia militias were cited by our analysts are improving the security environment and therefore enhancing, to a modest degree, the freedom of orginary people. I should not that we've always designated Iraq, in the post-Saddam era as "not free" and it's still not free. The improvement is modest but we thought significant enough to make note of, since we've been pretty hard on Iraq in the past.
The report may also put to rest notions that the Olympics would do anything to improve the state of freedom in China.
You can check out Puddington's full overview here.













Straw man
What's with the straw-man argument in relation to Bush? Who's been asserting that Bush has been a "catastrophe for the state of world freedom"?
I guess that's how you sidestep the proposition that exporting democracy on the back of a cruise missile has proven an utter failure.
I've felt hinky about Freedom House ever since Jim Woolsey was chairman of the board a while back.
What about Japan?
So, here's one thing I don't get: How come, when a new democracy peacefully elects an opposition party, it gets a bump up in the "political freedom" rating...but Japan, which has NEVER elected an opposition party (the one year of opposition control was due to a splintering of the ruling party in 1993) gets the highest possible score in "political freedom"?
Is it just because they're such a staunch ally of the U.S.? Or do the Freedom House people just not pay attention to Japan because it's so peaceful? Either way, Japan needs to be bumped down in the "political freedom" column until it votes for someone besides the eternally-ruling, mafia-affiliated "Liberal Democratic Party."
Certainly
the mere fact of having heavily contested elections does not necessarily guarantee political freedom or even the perception of political freedom. The Japanese are a good example to cite here but the fact is that they are mostly a-political...political life is something of a clown show in Japan...social power is much more diffuse and for the most part the Japanese system is such that politics is looked upon as a lowly profession..(as it should be)...Real political power lies with the permanent bureaucracies not with the fly-by nighters....and those folks actually work for a living. I'll take Japanese one-party rule over Italian free-for-alls any day....at least Japan has a government that is working (some of the time) on behalf of its citizens.
You must be joking
Japan's government works on behalf of its citizens?
Sure...if those citizens own or work for rural construction companies, mafia-backed small businesses, old-money trading companies, or the yakuza.
Remind me how racking up the world's largest public debt, paving over every river and coastline in the country, providing protection to inefficient domestic service industries, "losing" millions of pension records, and letting the finance industry drown for 15 years classifies as "working on behalf of citizens"?
South Asia
And I'd love to know how chaotic India has had a calming effect on its neighbours.
Almost every conflict in that area is backed on both sides by Indians (the government on one side and maoists, tamils, etc. on the other).
India is just the centrepiece and keystone of all disturbances in South Asia. I'm not blaming Indians, but as a massive, poor and corrupt state, it's virtually inevitable.
It makes more sense to say that corruption, violence, extremist ideology and other bedfellows of poverty have rubbed off on neighbours than to say that democracy has.