Global News : Passport : Ricks : Drezner : Walt : Rothkopf : Lynch
The Cable : Madam Secretary : Net Effect : Shadow Govt. : The Argument : The Call
Israel preparing to strike Iran?
Here's a thought. What if Barack Obama's first test on foreign policy comes not from an adversary, like Russia, or an avowed enemy, like North Korea, but from a close ally? To wit:
The IDF is drawing up options for a strike on Iranian nuclear facilities that do not include coordination with the United States, The Jerusalem Post has learned.
While its preference is to coordinate with the US, defense officials have said Israel is preparing a wide range of options for such an operation. "It is always better to coordinate," one top Defense Ministry official explained last week. "But we are also preparing options that do not include coordination."
First, keep in mind that militaries prepare contingencies for all kinds of scenarios. Second, this isn't really a new story -- I think we can safely assume that Israel has long been looking into its options to go it alone in striking Iran. Multiple news organizations, moreover, have reported that the Bush administration has told Israel not to do it. Third, there are real questions as to whether Israel has the capacity to take out Iran's nuclear installations. Doing so would require dozens, if not hundreds of sorties over multiple days across hostile territory, using F-15s that might not have the range to pull off the mission.
The real story here is the leak, clearly aimed at making President-elect Obama think twice about engaging Iran without assuaging Israeli concerns. There may also be some Israeli politics going on here, with the elections coming up early next year.
In my view, though, these kinds of leaks are very damaging, as they only strengthen Iran's hardliners and feed their seige mentality. Want to ensure Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's reelection? Keep leaking this stuff.













Time to get real...
Iran is an exporter of OIL but an IMPORTER of refined fuel. Even though they sit on a "sea of oil," they don't have the refining ability to even provide enough energy to power the nation's cars and homes. Ever since the end of its war with Iraq, the United States has been turning the screws on Iran's secure access to refined fuel through targeted sanctions. This nuclear program is an insurance policy to assure that the nation's grids will be getting the juice they need for the future.
What does Israel think Iran is going to do? Send a nuclear suitcase bomb to Hizballah, smuggle it into Israel, and detonate it in a major Israeli city? Get real... (1) this is a tall order, (2) Hizballah never participated in a verifiable act of terrorism until it started raining rockets down on civilians in northern Israel in 2006 (killing and kidnapping soldiers is not terrorism), and (3) any nuclear detonation would inevitably kill nearly as many Palestinians as it would Israelis, winning absolutely no friends.
The best option is to demand complete transparency from Iran and keep the pressure up while gradually negotiating a restoration of relations after Ahmadinejad steps down. Bombing Iran would derail any possible rapproachment, lead to an increase in violent attacks against US and Israeli targets, and convince Iran to start an accelerated nuclear weapons program in earnest just like Iraq did after Israel bombed its reactor in the early 80s. Not to mention, such an attack would justify the need for having a nuclear deterrent and assure that Saudi Arabia would feel the need to develop its own nuclear bomb, setting off an arms race.
Let's hope this talk is just political hot air...
Somebody doesn't get the
Somebody doesn't get the point here. Threatening Iran doesn't increase the chances of Ahmadi Nejhad to get re-elected, but it decreases it!
1- Since Ahamdi Nejhad was elected, all the military capacity that he used to Besiege people to vote for him has leaked out of his hand. THE SUPREME LEADER HAS REPLACED ALL HIS BACKERS!
2- Ahmadi Nejhad has made the economy worse, They are already talking about a "Unified Government" in the parliament, which means replacing Ahmadi Nejhad next period, and who is leading it? Larijani, Supreme Leader closest soldier. If these threats become more serious, the "Unified Government" plan would become more serious and Ahmadi Nejhad will definitely be replaced.
I said a few posts before, and I say it again, It's the best time to negotiate with Iran, The Government is divided, and Ahmadi Nejhad has the guts to move (unlike former Khatami who hid himself in the restroom of the UN to prevent confronting Bill Clinton)! The US can score most points with Iran in these days.
And finally, why do people think Israel and the US have the same interests in that region? if Iran gets closer to US, Arab countries will pay more attention to Israel again. part of the reason there hasn't been any war with Israel since the 70's is Iran! why should Israel want Arabs to pay attention to her again?