Posted By Blake Hounshell Share

Good for the Washington Post's editorial board for injecting some sense into the energy debate in the United States by calling for higher gas taxes to shore up falling prices and encourage smarter consumer choices.

Unfortunately, this falls into the category of "stuff that won't happen, but should." Note that in President-elect Barack Obama's interview Sunday on 60 Minutes, he gave no hint that he is going to risk his political future by calling for a tax:

Kroft: When the price of oil was at $147 a barrel, there were a lot of spirited and profitable discussions that were held on energy independence. Now you've got the price of oil under $60.

Mr. Obama: Right.

Kroft: Does doing something about energy is it less important now than…

Mr. Obama: It's more important. It may be a little harder politically, but it's more important.

Kroft: Why?

Mr. Obama: Well, because this has been our pattern. We go from shock to trance. You know, oil prices go up, gas prices at the pump go up, everybody goes into a flurry of activity. And then the prices go back down and suddenly we act like it's not important, and we start, you know filling up our SUVs again.

And, as a consequence, we never make any progress. It’s part of the addiction, all right. That has to be broken. Now is the time to break it. 

And yesterday, TNR's Brad Plumer reports, Jeff Bingaman, chair of the Senate's Energy and Natural Resources Committee, said "flat out... that a gas tax or 'floor' on oil prices was never going to happen, because 'the politics are problematic.'"

So, instead of the one tool that we know for a fact spurs innovation and encourages people to change their oil-consumption habits -- higher prices -- we're probably going to get massive, complicated subsidies and tax credits for powerful, well-connected constituencies (e.g. the corn lobby). The U.S. government, rather than the market, is going to decide which technologies to support.

Somehow, I don't think the House of Saud is too worried about that pledge to wean the United States off of oil from the Middle East in 10 years.

 
Facebook|Twitter|Reddit

BUNSON

3:35 AM ET

November 19, 2008

higher gas prices... even now?

I usually would be supportive of an increase in the gas price. But with the economic crisis now, even if it were politically amenable, I wonder if it would be such a good idea. I understand the harm of delaying innovation and polluting the environment with cheap gas. However, would raising gas prices right now really be such a good idea?

Raising gas prices would further strain the American consumer, who's already been hit hard. To me, it seems like it would be better for the government to allot part of a stimulus package to developing alternative energy, providing jobs, etc. And that sounds a lot like Obama's plan.

Thoughts?

 

Passport, FP’s flagship blog, brings you news and hidden angles on the biggest stories of the day, as well as insights and under-the-radar gems from around the world.

Read More